And of course it was Greenwald who first amplified the "offending" tweet, because be can't fathom anyone having a sense of relief about the candidate he preferred being defeated
It wasn't even a pro-Biden tweet, it was a pro-peaceful transition of power tweet! How can you possibly cave to this bad faith bullshit
For people who didn't see it, this is the anodyne tweet that caused Greenwald to absolutely lose his shit, leading to an editor getting harassed by Glenn's fellow Trump supporters and fired by her cowardly bosses:
"It this Missouri diner, everyone tells me that their top issue is William Rehnquist's concurrence in Bush v. Gore be treated as binding precedent" lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2021/01/the-pa…
It's amazing how conservatives have coalesced around the idea that a ad hoc concurrence so obviously stupid and unworkable that two members who JOINED BUSH V. GORE couldn't stomach joining it should be treated as longstanding black letter law
"Sorry Bill, the idea that giving first instance power to a legislature preempts any future executive or judicial action is too dumb, we'll stick with 'the 14th Amendment makes not having uniform statewide vote counting standards in this case and no others unconstitutional'"
"his supporters" glad we're finally admitting that at least
Anyway, it could be that Liz Cheney casting a superfluous vote for impeachment prevented Donald "Assange should be executed" Trump from acting on his natural civil libertarian impulses, but no actually it's that you're been hilariously wrong about him all along
Christ, when I joked that Jacobin would go full anti-anti QAnon I didn't mean it as a dare
The best part is the repeated projection that a movement dedicated to the idea that Donald Trump is a world-saving hero and a riot devoted to keeping him in office by fiat is ACTUALLY equally critical of both parties
"Lauren Boebert and Q were just involved in a few minor real estate deals many years ago"
I will observe again that the "Overton Window" was back-of-a-cocktail-napkin bullshit developed by an also-ran libertarian think tank, whose thesis was that Bush's drive to privatize Social Security would be a smashing political and policy success for the right
As Chotiner suggests, a big problem is that people defending the "Overton Window" don't seem to understand what the theory is. Advocating to move policy in your direction per se isn't the "Overton Window," unless your stated endpoint is DELIBERATELY crazy and unrealistic
The core fallacy of the Overton Window is its implicit assumption that in politics the other side has to meet you halfway and can't just walk away, and the problem in most cases is that this transparently false
Tonight we have dissents from both Sotomayor and Breyer in the last instance of the Supreme Court waving the matador's cape for Trump's machinery of death without so much as a word of reasoned justification
Trump's DOJ has moved with unseemly haste in order to preempt credible legal challenges, and the Court has happily gone along
What's funny is that Hawley definitely thinks he's a serious candidate for 2024, when after all that smarm and sedition he's 15 points underwater to *Ted Cruz.*
In fairness, Hawley and the seditious mob he incited and validated aren't exactly the same. They smeared shit on the walls of the Capitol literally; he just does it metaphorically.