I'd be happy to explain. Trump's trans ban took the form of a memo that directed the military to promulgate regulations prohibiting trans service AND enlistment.
Biden's order repealed the memo, and *explicitly* repealed regulations prohibiting trans service—but not enlistment.
Biden's order, as well as the WH's advance summary, explains at length exactly how the military must repeal various regulations restricting transgender *service.* It does not, however, explain how the military must repeal regulations restricting transgender enlistment.
Simply repealing Trump's memo does not automatically repeal the regulations that were implemented in accordance with the memo. That is presumably why Biden also explicitly repealed regulations regarding transgender service. I do not know why he didn't do the same for enlistment.
We might have expected Biden to include language in his EO explicitly clearing away regulations banning trans enlistment, just as he included language explicitly clearing away regulations banning trans service. Again, he did not, a puzzling choice that caused my confusion.
Instead, we got an executive order that said: "The memo is repealed, the regulations banning transgender service are repealed, and DOD+DHS must give me an update on implementing this order."
Then DOD Sec. Austin immediately said: OK, the enlistment ban is also repealed.
I am genuinely sorry for the confusion I caused by questioning the scope of the EO on the basis of the WH press release, but the truth is that neither the press release nor the EO is very clear, and we needed Austin's statement to confirm the death of the enlistment ban.
Luckily we can count on civil rights attorneys to ensure that the Biden administration and the Pentagon fully repeal all remaining rules and regulations that discriminate against transgender people in any way.
•Trump is out of office, so he can no longer be violating the emoluments clause.
•The COVID-related restrictions on abortion have been lifted, so those cases no longer present live controversies.
SCOTUS deftly avoided controversy by ducking these cases until they became moot.
The Supreme Court also issued a rare decision in favor of a death row inmate, although the disposition is very complicated. Basically, SCOTUS nudged the lower courts to reconsider letting this man bring his spiritual advisor into the execution chamber. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…
Incarcerated people have a substantially higher chance of surviving COVID-19 if their requests for compassionate release come before judges appointed by Obama or Clinton. Those unfortunately enough to face Trump judges are much more likely to die of COVID behind bars.
In other words, the number of deaths attributable to Trump judges is already high. (It’s going to rise exponentially over the next half-century.)
It’s great that Trump signed a criminal justice reform bill, but the tragic reality is that his judicial nominees are going to spend the rest of our lifetimes condemning incarcerated people to needless deaths.
In 2012, Jeffrey Clark—the Justice Department official who hatched a plan to facilitate Trump’s coup—was CHAIR of the Federalist Society’s Environmental Law and Property Rights Practice Group. He was also involved in at least two other Federalist Society working groups.
Two current or former chairs of Federalist Society practice groups were intimately involved in Trump’s failed coup: John Eastman and, we now know, Jeffrey Clark. slate.com/news-and-polit…
Don’t worry, I’m sure the Federalist Society will take appropriate action to distance itself from coup-abettors in its ranks by (squints) continuing to invite them to speak at events
This piece by @BrandonMagner does a terrific job explaining why Biden fired Peter Robb, the NLRB GC. Robb took unprecedented steps to sabotage the agency, slash its staff, obliterate pro-union precedent, bust its own union, and grind its gears to a halt. brandonmagner.substack.com/p/should-biden…
I’m not sure it’s really registering how big a deal it is that Biden fired Robb. Progressives were worried Biden would let Robb finish out his term. And Robb refused to resign at Biden’s request! But Biden sacked him anyway. Labor leaders are hailing it as a massive victory.
If progressives were looking for a big, unmistakable sign that Biden would pursue an aggressively pro-labor agenda, they got it on Day One with the firing of Peter Robb. slate.com/news-and-polit…