We should take air pollution as seriously as we take the pandemic. It causes a wide range of terrible conditions. But once again, the government fails to protect us. theguardian.com/environment/20…
If anything, social norms, unchecked by either public information campaigns or law enforcement, are heading in the wrong direction.
I seldom used to see people sitting in their parked cars with the engines idling. Now it's everywhere.
It's madness. I see drivers looking at their phones with the engine running, wasting fuel and creating a cloud of toxic smoke. On my way home, 30 minutes later, they're still at it.
Perhaps they're texting their friends to complain about the cost of petrol.
When you're a pedestrian or a cyclist, your needs are disregarded by the government and local authorities. But as soon as you step into a car, the red carpet is rolled out for you. You are granted money, space and rights that pedestrians don't get.
The police turn a blind eye to the #EverydayCrime of motoring: speeding, idling, excessive noise, parking across pavements and cycle lanes.
Uniquely, these crimes are widely tolerated, committed by millions every day and seldom prosecuted. Yet they have real impacts on the lives of others. What is it about driving that grants such impunity?
I was once told by a taxi driver that anyone who commits a crime should be locked up.
"No ifs, no buts, no fines, no suspensions. Lock 'em up and throw away the key."
"Any crime?"
"Yes."
"Like doing 37 in a 30 zone, as you're are right now?"
He didn't say a word after that.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I argue that some lies about the pandemic are so dangerous that they should simply be banned. Why should we value the right to spread false information above the right to life?
This week’s column. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
I also discuss some pretty startling hypocrisy. The co-founder of the excellent Anti-Virus site is Sam Bowman (@s8mb). In his day job @ASI, he attacks public health messaging, in ways that happen to coincide with the interests of the tobacco industry, which, er, helps fund @ASI.
The Adam Smith Institute has also made statements about climate breakdown, malnutrition and other issues which are just as idiotic and unscientific as those Bowman rightly exposes on Anti-Virus. Good work on Covid, Sam, but physician, heal thyself.
A "post-viral tsunami" is gathering, with devastating consequences for large numbers of people. Some of its effects closely resemble ME/CFS, a condition whose 250,000 sufferers in the UK have been horribly neglected.
It's time for action.
My column. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
There's a grim fact we have to face: for some people, Long Covid is likely to mean Lifelong Covid. The sufferers, like people with ME/CFS, will be seen as "inconvenient patients", and governments will be tempted to brush them under the carpet. We cannot let this happen.
Long Covid can hit anyone, including young, fit and healthy people with only the mildest initial infections. It can cause brain damage, heart damage, lung damage and many other effects. Ending lockdown too early is likely to condemn some people to a lifetime of suffering.
A few more years of this and we'll be a failed state.
It is hard to imagine a radically different future for the country in which you live. But plenty of nations have flipped from prosperity into political and economic collapse, often through gross misrule.
Gross misrule is the UK's other pandemic.
And there's currently no vaccine.
The usual treatment is effective opposition. But, given the scale of the crises we now face, Labour is being remarkably quiet and passive. It should be mobilising its base in protest, while articulating a fresh and exciting political vision.
A lot of words need to be eaten by people who were not just wrong about the pandemic, but dangerously wrong. They bear some responsibility for the catastrophe we now face.
A big part of the problem is that the BBC chose to interpret its duty of "impartiality" as providing airtime for people who contested scientific facts, even when they were demonstrably wrong.
It has made the same mistake with issue after issue.
And sometimes it's not a mistake.
Sometimes it's an attempt to generate noise.
If people talk about your programme, that's deemed a success, even if they do so for all the wrong reasons.
A day of shame for a government that has screwed up its pandemic response worse than almost any other.
Through a lethal combination of incompetence, callousness and corruption. theguardian.com/world/2021/jan…
When this is over, there must be a proper reckoning. Not a limited inquiry chaired by a government stooge, but an independently-appointed, full public investigation with an open and evolving mandate.
We should also demand an official period of mourning for all those killed and disabled by this terrible, avoidable catastrophe.
So far, Boris Johnson has scarcely acknowledged the victims of the pandemic.