They EU are asking for early notification and it's for transparency reasons.
And it's not a special British clause.
Yes, it could result in the EU stepping, but that would be a very big thing, and it hasn't happened yet.
If it happens, we can all get upset about it.
Some Brexit "neutrals" will finally learn that Remainers never believed the EU would be fluffy to those outside the bloc.
Some Brexit supporters will learn what it *actually* feels to have an economic super power on their doorstep able to act in their interest and against theirs, in opposed to their fantasies about how they are subsidising companies to leave.
Lots of people will learn the EU can move quite quickly when it has to.
Of course, this wouldn't effect us if we were in the EU...and we'd probably want transparency at this point too.
AZ were not able to satisfy the Commission when they met with them yesterday, and now the EU wants greater visibility. If AZ aren't covering anything up, it may never go beyond this.
Right now this is a non-story that has the potential to be a big story in the future, but as usual the legendary self created shoulder chip the UK has is going to make it the biggest story of the day.
But the British press need something for the EU haters to masturbate too.
So here we are in outrage city again.
I hate to break this to everybody but this is probably going to be UK political discourse for the next 10 years at the least.
It's going to be a long "Once in a generation".
/End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Or do Brexiteer politicians get a free pass for treating people as if they are thick and making all Brexiteers look thick, because it allows them play victim when people react and call them thick?
Customers will know, for example, that their data is safe under GDPR.
Potential employees will know the company respect their rights more than the Peruvian immigrant with a plummy voice who hasn't done a hard days work in his deceitful sad little life.
The problem with the regulatory argument is that the invention that leads to regulation tends to be regulated at the national level before the EU level. The EU then provides a European forum for regulatory convergence and a dominant power to represent it internationally.
There is also the inconvenient fact that the regulations are put together working with industry, and in this case it will be the same companies.
Essentially leading to very similar regulations in the same sort of time frame as other EU countries, only we won't get any input into the European recognised regulations or have the same weight in the global forums.
In terms of how we're here on fish, the list goes on and on. There are a multitude of complex reasons which get over simplified to "It's the EU's fault".
And I don't believe in saying "fishare just x of the economy", the government should be doing their best to set policy to support all business no matter the size.
If we take exports, and a very simplistic view. We're looking at ~64% of our exports go to countries we don't trade with on WTO rules and ~40% of exports go to countries we do.