/1 on the advantages of replacing high leverage margin swap/futures positions with options
/2 have heard anecdotes of participants losing large parts of their crypto holdings by chasing the bull market with mistimed leveraged longs and see thousands of nameless participants in the billions in notional that are liquidated on any material move in the markets.
/3 there are two enormous costs to engaging in this behavior:
1) poor traders tend to chase, margin longing after significant price moves up have already happened. combined with high leverage, this means they manage to lose money by being liquidated (force sold) on pullbacks.
This results in somehow losing money longing in a bull market.
2) Derivatives exchanges charge a maintenance margin when you are liquidated to give them a buffer to close losing positions prior to the bankruptcy price.
Any excess goes to the insurance fund. This excess necessitates that margined positions do not capture their full EV.
/4 how can this EV loss be avoided while preserving the desired level of exposure?
One, don't be a fucking degenerate. The vast majority of people trading on leverage lose money, and this in a 10 year secular bull market that has minted everyone who has survived.
But if you believe you have truly found a good spot to add exposure, add it in an asymmetric risk/reward fashion with options.
/5 Rather than a 10x long on ETHUSD, buy the appropriate expiry for your thesis and a strike that gives you the desired gearing to the capital you feel appropriate to risk.
You have now created leverage on your portfolio that cannot be liquidated by the volatility of the market but maintains capped downside and unlimited upside. You have solved problem 1 and 2 above.
/6 An example trade on @deribitexchange taken near the $20,000 upside break in BTC and the simultaneous CME futures announcement. Naked long 450x ETH 1/29 calls at an average of $28.50 (capital risked $12,825). PnL ultimately reached ~$160,000.
@DeribitExchange /7 Key to note - reference price on this was ~$660 on ETHUSD. The market dipped to as low as $550 shortly after the position was entered (-16.6%). If you had taken a 10x long on ETHUSD, you would have been liquidated & not realized the $160,000 PnL later as the trade played out.
/8 By using a call instead of a leveraged swap long, we have eliminated the path dependence of the trade (particularly valuable in an extremely volatile asset space) and instead replaced it with a durational limitation. For most in this space, I would guess this improves outcome.
/9 In the last year, options have finally become a viable instrument in this asset class. @deribitexchange volumes, OI, and liquidity are the best by a proverbial mile, and it is the platform I use. Punt on leveraged swaps and futures while ignoring options at your own peril.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
An alt has the veneer of scarcity within its own system. But that mirage evaporates when it is viewed outside its border.
If an alt then lacks scarcity outside of its own confines, its only value stems from two sources: its use case as a speculative vehicle and the minimum amount necessary to be held at any one time to achieve its demanded utilization.
Remember this chart if anyone dares tell you there is scarcity in alts; ~7,500 alts are listed on CMC alone (more than 2x the count from 1 year ago), with 2x+ that number unlisted and floating in the ether.
One alt threatens the scarcity of BTC. Many alts only ossify it.
/1 The first difficulty adjustment post-halving is indicative of an ~15% hash power ratchet down.
/2 This is somewhat in line with the model mix assumed by @BlockwareTeam's report in March (blockwaresolutions.com/research-and-p…) where S9's were seen at 38.6%. That number probably trended down as miners positioned into the halving and upgraded equipment.
/3 A material difficulty adjustment downwards can be understood as a bloodletting of the weakest mining participants. Parri passau, these miners are obligated to sell the largest % of rewards to cover costs. Lower cost miners could also sell all inventory, but are not mandated.
/1 At the risk of looking like a fool by Monday, I want to make the case for why I am a buyer of Bitcoin at the $8,500-$8,600 level, near 20% off the recent local high. In a sea of shorts frothing about a continued plunge, it seems like the contrarian position to adopt.
/2 Beginning with a broad macro perspective, after 7 days of rarely seen bloodshed in global equity markets, and in particular US equities, bidders have finally stepped in today with a rally off the capitulation notched in the overnight spoos markets.
/3 Gold is down the most since 2013, possibly sold to cover margin calls - this is a further sign of an emotional and capitulatory macro environment. In all of this, Bitcoin has held, losing less on the day than gold(!).
/1 We are witnessing a resurgence in Chinese demand for cryptocurrencies. This trend in the making comes after more than a year of relative quiet, a reminder of the time when Chinese volumes were king.
/2 What is behind this sudden risk appetite? The Hang Seng index has driven up 20% since the end of 2018 (HSCEI below), while margin trading volumes have nearly doubled from December of last year.
/3 Important to understand - Chinese equity markets are much more retail-centric, with the archetypal Mom and Pop investors accentuating price reflexivity. We may now have turned a corner on the enormously damaging price effects of forced deleveraging in Chinese assets.
1/ The only difference between Binance $BNB and a chop shop is that CZ is breaking down his customers instead of autos.
/2 CZ learned the craft from the best at OKCoin (blockchaintransparency.org) and then honed wash trading techniques at Binance, adding another innovation, charging projects listing fees to pad revenue
/3 He managed to sell the entire space on a perpetual money machine known as Binance Coin $BNB that allows him to continuously liquidate a token through a burn mechanism that he would otherwise not have a market for. (