On the sound & fury of the school reopening debate: A thread in which I argue we are asking the wrong questions, and lay out the questions I wish we were asking. 1/
All parties deserve some empathy after this monstrous year. Parents are exhausted by uncertainty & the stops & starts of closing/re-opening. Women are carrying an impossible load, with long-term impacts for their careers & well-being. 2/
Kids are separated from teachers, peers, & services they need. Many have lost family members, or seen the toll Covid takes on those who do survive. And remote learning works better for kids who already have more resources (devices, connectivity, space). 3/
We've treated teachers like cannon fodder, & they are terrified for their health & that of their families. Saying they are safe with existing precautions is gaslighting. Finally, policymakers are not virus psychics, yet we blame them when they don't commit to reopening dates. 4/
The false dichotomy, “Schools are safe/schools are not safe,” is just that; this is a question of values that has to be considered in conjunction with “science.” We are trying to address multiple problems by reopening schools, & there are tradeoffs. 5/
Let's make our values explicit - see Educational Goods. Mine: 1) Death & long-term illness are irreversible; as @illanahorn put it, life loss is worse than learning loss 2) I reject utilitarianism, & believe in maximizing the welfare of the least advantaged (Rawls> Bentham) 6/
We have a responsibility to 3) Protect kids' physical & mental health, 4) Ensure parents can make ends meet, & flourish by participating in work they value, 5) Address major inequalities in kids’ ability to benefit from remote learning. 7/
Current take re. young children: School is an indoor activity, but universal weekly testing, ventilation, and PPE could make schools safe for the adults in them, or for the adults in the kids’ families (+kids). Asymp. kids transmit virus to each other & adults. 8/
Re. older kids, I'm deeply worried about the emerging literature on cardiac & autoimmune consequences (not MIS-C, but serious issues) & unknowns about new variants. We don't know enough yet, & new-variant land, IMHO, is the wrong time to experiment . 9/
So, where do we go from here? 1) To keep schools open for younger kids, we need massive investments in safety infrastructure, 2) We also need massive investments that increase resources for kids to participate remotely (devices/internet) 10/
3) We need alternate ways for families to access services like food, mental health, etc that aren’t school dependent., & 4) We need a less impoverished debate recognizing how difficult the choices are that we face, and one that avoids sweeping Science Says claims. 11/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Mrs. Kopp, FL: "The face masks will be used as a backup for students who come to school without face masks or whose face masks get lost or damaged, which happens quite often." 2/ donorschoose.org/project/safety…
Mrs. Minor, MS: "Sometimes face masks get wet or dirty during the day and need to be replaced...When face masks are clean and fit properly, students are more comfortable and able to focus and learn." 3/
Mrs. Fields, MI: "These air purifiers will help keep the air clear, especially during those times when masks cannot be worn. [eating] Please help keep the air clean for my Pre-k students, so they can breathe again!" 4/
NYCDOE staff Covid data: Soundcheck on examples of individual schools with cumulative % staff Covid👇.
Examples drawn from schools with 200%+ increase in staff cases btw 1/11-1/25; 44 of the 54 are elementaries.
Thx in advance for any insights. 1/
Important: Both on & off site staff cases are being reported as onsite, as HS have >0 new staff cases reported in Jan. No offsite student or staff cases (total for year=0). Implication is I'll use total staff as denominator, not onsite staff. @SarahCohodes, thoughts?
2/
Why are positivity rates in/outside of NYC schools so different? My conclusion: though multi-causal, main driver is that in-school tests are less sensitive, which produces divergence in + rates over & above differences in pop sampled. We are missing a lot of + cases. 1/
Let’s start with an example we know all too well: standardized reading and math tests. Decisions about what counts as “proficient” are arbitrary, and can lead to widespread confusion when tests use wildly different thresholds for passing. (Think NAEP/state; pre- and post-CC.) 2/
We face a similar challenge in interpreting Covid test results. Currently administered tests vary dramatically in their ability to identify positive cases. The tests used in NYC schools miss more cases because both the type & quality of tests differ. 3/