Schumer argues late impeachment must go ahead because if not, a president could commit crime, quickly resign, and bingo! -- immune from impeachment. Future president will commit heinous crime, immediately quit, and get away scot free. 1/4 washingtonpost.com/politics/gop-s…
First, that's not what Trump did. Form your own opinion on crime part, but he did not resign. Second, presidential resignation is pretty big deal, isn't it? Presidents extremely reluctant to do it. Only happened once. 2/4
Third, what about criminal liability? Dems appear to have no interest, but Trump is still liable to prosecution. Could have serious consequences, whereas guilty impeachment verdict at most would bar Trump from holding future office he likely won't run for, anyway. 3/4
Finally, there is censure. Why didn't Congress pass resolution of censure in 14 days Trump was president after Capitol riot? Would likely have gotten significant Republican support. Even if not, would still have passed House, Senate. Could still pass one now. 4/4 End.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Democrats have created lots of problems for themselves by rushing to impeach a president who will be a former president before trial begins. Senate Dems want to confirm Biden appointments, get started on agenda. But the trial... 1/6 washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…
WP reports Dems want quick trial, get it over with, get on to business. Maybe split days, impeachment and other biz. But that would just prolong the proceedings. Maybe Pelosi can play tricks with timing, delay sending to Senate. She's done it before! 2/6 washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…
Now Democrats want Senate Republicans to help get them out of impeachment jam. Really? Why should Republicans do that? 3/6
Looks very much like Trump impeachment will happen. House GOP expects Democrats to move ahead next week, possibly Wednesday. 'It appears the train has left the station,' said one GOP source. 1/6
In 2019 House GOP leaders took pride in fact that zero Republicans supported impeachment. Unlikely that will happen again, even though, issues aside, many think it is crazy to impeach a president with days left in office. 2/6
House GOP leadership has not yet had conference call with members, so it's unclear what most think. Unclear how many would support Democratic articles. Probably a low number. 3/6
One little corner of things: Think I'm down about 13,000 followers in the last 48 hours or so.
Now, down 22,000.
Now, down nearly 29,000. I think about 1500 of that came slowly between election and early January, when I was writing that results showed Biden victory and Trump legal options narrowing, then finished. Angered some followers. But big, precipitous drop has come in recent hours.
An appalling moment at Speaker Pelosi's news conference. After months of stonewalling Trump efforts to pass targeted short-term relief for millions of Americans suffering in the pandemic, she changed her mind. 1/10 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-…
A relief measure Pelosi had been blocking for months is now OK. Why? 'A total game-changer--a new president and a vaccine,' she explained. 2/10 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-…
As policy, it made no sense. Why condition help for struggling Americans on the development of a vaccine? Didn't the lack of vaccine in recent months, with virus raging, make it *more* urgent to help people? Yet Pelosi wouldn't do it. 3/10
Must say, the Jen Psaki Russian hat brouhaha is amusing. Yes, that was her, all smiles, in 2014 with Russian FM Lavrov and spox Zakharova, plus John Kerry. Yes, she's wearing hammer-and-sickle hat they gave her. Russian contacts! 1/4 usatoday.com/story/news/fac…
It's amusing now, of course, in light of Russia frenzy Psaki's party later whipped up. Of course the circumstances of the picture were innocent, but so were circumstances of Jeff Sessions' meet-and-greet in 2016, about which he and others were questioned by Mueller. 2/4
Instead of laughing it off, Psaki immediately reached for the laziest, most accusatory response: Anyone who passes on such 'misinformation' is 'simply a puppet of the [Russian] propaganda machine.' Really! 3/4
If you watched Trump attorneys newser yesterday, you saw Sidney Powell say they had 'one very strong witness' who explained how the alleged Dominion-Smartmatic vote-changing operation worked. His 'stunning, detailed' affidavit was attached to Lin Wood lawsuit. From Powell: 1/6
Most people probably haven't had a chance to read the affidavit, so I'm going to post the whole thing--just eight pages, including a bunch of unexplained redactions.. You can read for yourself. The first two pages: 2/6