Do you want to have your fundraiser tweeted to 4 million+ donors on large Twitter pages? Given that @MonsterFundrise and its eight recently-created clones have just over 2000 followers between them, we're skeptical they can pull it off, but we took a look.

cc: @ZellaQuixote
These nine accounts (@MonsterFundrise, @FundingMore, @FundingTweet, @FundingAdept_, @Fd_Collector, @CharityGofundme, @Funding_Skilled, @FundingCrowed, and @F_Experienced) all do the same two things: link GoFundMes and promote a website called monsterfundrise(dot)com.
We checked out monsterfundrise(dot)com via Tor (always exercise caution when visiting potentially shady websites), which claims to promote your GoFundMe to 1 million followers via "5 Large Twitter Pages". Needless to say, we didn't whip out our "creidt cards" (sic).
The "Our Network" section of monsterfundrise(dot)com indeed lists five largish Twitter accounts (@FundraisingNews, @Fundraising, @GlobalFund, @FundingCircleUK, and @StopFundingHate), but none of these accounts link GoFundMes or appear to have any connection with MonsterFundrise.
Also listed in the "Our Network" section of monsterfundrise(dot)com are seven of the nine accounts that promote the site (although one of the links is broken). These accounts do indeed promote GoFundMes, but have very few followers.
A quick reverse image search of the "Team" section of monsterfundrise(dot)com reveals that this is merely the latest incarnation in a series of similar websites. At least one previous incarnation, monsterfundraiser(dot)com, was suspended by its webhost.
Despite the claims that monsterfundrise(dot)com promotes its customers' GoFundMes on "large Twitter pages", we found no evidence that the vast majority of the fundraisers they promote have ever been tweeted by large accounts. (Many have only been shared by @MonsterFundrise etc.)
The GoFundMes posted by @MonsterFundrise do get retweeted, yet the majority garner few or no likes: ~0.05 likes per retweet, or 1 like for every 20 retweets. (Most GoFundMe tweets get slightly more likes than retweets: 1.12 likes per retweet is the current average ratio.)
Who's retweeting the @MonsterFundrise GofundMe tweets (usually without liking them)? Most of the amplifiers are relatively new accounts - 1236 of 1757 (70.3%) were created June 2020 or later. Despite @MonsterFundrise's claims of a massive audience, most have few or no followers.
Are the accounts amplifying @MonsterFundrise and its clones bots? We can't be sure - they mostly tweet via the Twitter website and Android app, which generally indicates human use, but it is possible to automate either or both, albeit against Twitter TOS.
The accounts retweeting the @MonsterFundrise GoFundMe tweets also amplify a few other accounts. The content retweeted is largely promotional in nature, and as with the @MonsterFundrise tweets, many of the other tweets amplified end up with far more retweets than likes.
(We've observed before that a pattern of substantially more retweets than likes across many accounts is a sign of artificial amplification, whether from bots or human astroturfing efforts such as the #Mighty200 MAGA retweet rooms.)

Slight correction - the titles of the first two columns in the table should be "account retweeted" and "number of retweets", respectively.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Conspirador Norteño

Conspirador Norteño Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @conspirator0

24 Jan
Which porridge won today's Twitter duel? (Also, does anyone understand why these trends were labeled "politics"?)

cc: @ZellaQuixote
Thus far, oatmeal is the clear victor with 14087 tweets from 13240 accounts, compared to 10854 tweets/9966 accounts for cream of wheat. Although not mentioned in @nhannahjones's original tweet, grits put in a strong showing as a third-party candidate (4752 tweets/4199 accounts).
We ran VADER sentiment analysis on the porridge tweets. Since the topic is tasty foodstuffs rather than political candidates, it is perhaps not surprising that the ten-minute average sentiment scores for all three cereals are positive throughout.
Read 5 tweets
24 Jan
A conspiracy theory that a member of Joe Biden's Secret Service detail is his "Chinese government handler" has been floating around MAGA Twitter since the inauguration. (The man in question is of Korean descent and has worked for the Secret Service for years.)

cc: @ZellaQuixote
The false claim that one of the Secret Service agents guarding Biden is his "Chinese Handler" started popping up here and there in December 2020 (and possibly earlier, as it's not unlikely that some related content was removed as part of Twitter's recent QAnon purge).
The bogus "Biden's secret service agent is his CCP handler" narrative appears to have gained traction on two previous occasions. The first was December 19th, 2020, and was the result of multiple accounts misrepresenting a video posted by @TheHill of Biden attending church.
Read 4 tweets
23 Jan
In Aug 2020, someone redirected antifa(dot)com to joebiden(dot)com, and has now switched it to whitehouse(dot)gov. Even though anyone can buy a domain and point it at any website, some folks falsely insist Biden is affiliated with the antifa(dot)com domain name.

cc @ZellaQuixote
Whoever bought the antifa(dot)com domain also appears to have briefly pointed it at kamalaharris(dot)org and buildbackbetter(dot)gov. Again, this does not require the consent or involvement of the website being redirected to.
We downloaded tweets containing links to antifa(dot)com. There are four spikes in tweet volume, corresponding to when major accounts noticed the redirect and tweeted about it. (Earlier traffic is off-topic and extremely light, and has thus been excluded from this analysis.)
Read 7 tweets
22 Jan
Are tweets about Xinjiang from @ChineseEmbinUS being artificially amplified by a network of repetitively named batch-created accounts? (Spoiler: yes, and they retweet other Chinese diplomatic and state media accounts as well.)

cc: @ZellaQuixote
We downloaded recent retweets of @ChineseEmbinUS's tweets, and noticed several spikes in account creation (mostly in early 2020). The accounts created during these spikes have distinctive patterns in their names, similar numbers of tweets/likes, and so on.
By exploring the retweeters of the other tweets retweeted by these accounts, we found a total of 674 batch-created accounts, created between December 2019 and January 2021. The naming schemes sometimes vary from batch to batch (table show representatives examples).
Read 7 tweets
20 Jan
It's a Tuesday in January, which is a great time to look at a retweet botnet that uses custom apps with official-sounding names like "Mobile App 9.2".

cc: @ZellaQuixote
This botnet consist of 71 accounts, the majority of which were made in 2017 or 2018 but were largely dormant until December 2020. Almost all recent content is automated via "Mobile App 9.2", with a few other custom apps thrown in. The accounts tweet on very similar schedules.
Almost all of this botnet's tweets are retweets (6045 of 6372 tweets, 94.8%), and almost all content is in Turkish (6202 of 6372 tweets, 97.3%).
Read 5 tweets
19 Jan
A bogus claim from @amuse that Biden's transition team asked the National Guard not to station troops near Biden who have voted in GOP primaries/contributed to GOP candidates went viral recently, being retweeted thousands of times and copied by several accounts.

cc @ZellaQuixote
This is not @amuse's first disinfo rodeo. Previous hits include falsely claiming that the QAnon shaman is antifa (he's been identified as Trump supporter Jacob Chansley and arrested) and stating that both Biden and Trump got more than 270 electoral votes (this didn't happen).
One last thing: @amuse regularly deletes older tweets, hiding from the casual observer the account's track record of peddling disinformation. Plenty of @amuse's tweets have been archived, however, which is how we found most of the ones featured in this thread.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!