Do you want to have your fundraiser tweeted to 4 million+ donors on large Twitter pages? Given that @MonsterFundrise and its eight recently-created clones have just over 2000 followers between them, we're skeptical they can pull it off, but we took a look.
We checked out monsterfundrise(dot)com via Tor (always exercise caution when visiting potentially shady websites), which claims to promote your GoFundMe to 1 million followers via "5 Large Twitter Pages". Needless to say, we didn't whip out our "creidt cards" (sic).
Also listed in the "Our Network" section of monsterfundrise(dot)com are seven of the nine accounts that promote the site (although one of the links is broken). These accounts do indeed promote GoFundMes, but have very few followers.
A quick reverse image search of the "Team" section of monsterfundrise(dot)com reveals that this is merely the latest incarnation in a series of similar websites. At least one previous incarnation, monsterfundraiser(dot)com, was suspended by its webhost.
Despite the claims that monsterfundrise(dot)com promotes its customers' GoFundMes on "large Twitter pages", we found no evidence that the vast majority of the fundraisers they promote have ever been tweeted by large accounts. (Many have only been shared by @MonsterFundrise etc.)
The GoFundMes posted by @MonsterFundrise do get retweeted, yet the majority garner few or no likes: ~0.05 likes per retweet, or 1 like for every 20 retweets. (Most GoFundMe tweets get slightly more likes than retweets: 1.12 likes per retweet is the current average ratio.)
Who's retweeting the @MonsterFundrise GofundMe tweets (usually without liking them)? Most of the amplifiers are relatively new accounts - 1236 of 1757 (70.3%) were created June 2020 or later. Despite @MonsterFundrise's claims of a massive audience, most have few or no followers.
Are the accounts amplifying @MonsterFundrise and its clones bots? We can't be sure - they mostly tweet via the Twitter website and Android app, which generally indicates human use, but it is possible to automate either or both, albeit against Twitter TOS.
The accounts retweeting the @MonsterFundrise GoFundMe tweets also amplify a few other accounts. The content retweeted is largely promotional in nature, and as with the @MonsterFundrise tweets, many of the other tweets amplified end up with far more retweets than likes.
(We've observed before that a pattern of substantially more retweets than likes across many accounts is a sign of artificial amplification, whether from bots or human astroturfing efforts such as the #Mighty200 MAGA retweet rooms.)
Thus far, oatmeal is the clear victor with 14087 tweets from 13240 accounts, compared to 10854 tweets/9966 accounts for cream of wheat. Although not mentioned in @nhannahjones's original tweet, grits put in a strong showing as a third-party candidate (4752 tweets/4199 accounts).
We ran VADER sentiment analysis on the porridge tweets. Since the topic is tasty foodstuffs rather than political candidates, it is perhaps not surprising that the ten-minute average sentiment scores for all three cereals are positive throughout.
A conspiracy theory that a member of Joe Biden's Secret Service detail is his "Chinese government handler" has been floating around MAGA Twitter since the inauguration. (The man in question is of Korean descent and has worked for the Secret Service for years.)
The false claim that one of the Secret Service agents guarding Biden is his "Chinese Handler" started popping up here and there in December 2020 (and possibly earlier, as it's not unlikely that some related content was removed as part of Twitter's recent QAnon purge).
The bogus "Biden's secret service agent is his CCP handler" narrative appears to have gained traction on two previous occasions. The first was December 19th, 2020, and was the result of multiple accounts misrepresenting a video posted by @TheHill of Biden attending church.
In Aug 2020, someone redirected antifa(dot)com to joebiden(dot)com, and has now switched it to whitehouse(dot)gov. Even though anyone can buy a domain and point it at any website, some folks falsely insist Biden is affiliated with the antifa(dot)com domain name.
Whoever bought the antifa(dot)com domain also appears to have briefly pointed it at kamalaharris(dot)org and buildbackbetter(dot)gov. Again, this does not require the consent or involvement of the website being redirected to.
We downloaded tweets containing links to antifa(dot)com. There are four spikes in tweet volume, corresponding to when major accounts noticed the redirect and tweeted about it. (Earlier traffic is off-topic and extremely light, and has thus been excluded from this analysis.)
Are tweets about Xinjiang from @ChineseEmbinUS being artificially amplified by a network of repetitively named batch-created accounts? (Spoiler: yes, and they retweet other Chinese diplomatic and state media accounts as well.)
We downloaded recent retweets of @ChineseEmbinUS's tweets, and noticed several spikes in account creation (mostly in early 2020). The accounts created during these spikes have distinctive patterns in their names, similar numbers of tweets/likes, and so on.
By exploring the retweeters of the other tweets retweeted by these accounts, we found a total of 674 batch-created accounts, created between December 2019 and January 2021. The naming schemes sometimes vary from batch to batch (table show representatives examples).
This botnet consist of 71 accounts, the majority of which were made in 2017 or 2018 but were largely dormant until December 2020. Almost all recent content is automated via "Mobile App 9.2", with a few other custom apps thrown in. The accounts tweet on very similar schedules.
Almost all of this botnet's tweets are retweets (6045 of 6372 tweets, 94.8%), and almost all content is in Turkish (6202 of 6372 tweets, 97.3%).
A bogus claim from @amuse that Biden's transition team asked the National Guard not to station troops near Biden who have voted in GOP primaries/contributed to GOP candidates went viral recently, being retweeted thousands of times and copied by several accounts.
This is not @amuse's first disinfo rodeo. Previous hits include falsely claiming that the QAnon shaman is antifa (he's been identified as Trump supporter Jacob Chansley and arrested) and stating that both Biden and Trump got more than 270 electoral votes (this didn't happen).
One last thing: @amuse regularly deletes older tweets, hiding from the casual observer the account's track record of peddling disinformation. Plenty of @amuse's tweets have been archived, however, which is how we found most of the ones featured in this thread.