Thread: There is the usual talking point going around the pro-Iran-Regime-Lobby in which Israel is once again presented as somehow doing something wrong by seeking to work with the US on Iran threats...or that Israel could start a "war"...the usual "war" bogeyman myth
The fact is that Israel is the one being threatened. Israel doesn't run proxy groups throughout the Middle East and arm them illegally by giving militias weapons...or have whole days devoted to bashing Iran or soldiers marching on Iran's flag. Only Iran does that.
There is never going to be a "war" with Iran, war is the talking point to claim that those who oppose the Iran regime far-right extremists are "hawks" or "for war"...which is nonsensical. Iran's regime can't afford a war, that is why it arms militias in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon,Yemen
Iran knows how to get the poor to do the fighting for it...recruiting people from Pakistan and Afghanistan, not to defend their own communities, but sending them to Syria while they are attacked at home by extremists. Awful.
So the "war' talking point is always used to claim Israel wants "war"...or "drives wars"...but there is no evidence of this. Israel is totally open about its goals to deter Iran or keep its entrenchment in Syria away from the Golan. Israel found relative calm with hamas-Hezbollah
Look at Hamas and Hezbollah, they don't want "war"...Iran doesn't want "war" and neither does Israel...no one wants "war"...it's just a talking point dragged out in western media to present a "pro-war" and "anti-war" stance.
The most anti-war country is Israel...it wants to build its economy and continue making peace deals...it has zero interest in conflict and all its investment in defense tech, for precision weapons and air defense, is to stop large wars.
The idea that Israel somehow is in the way of US-Iran getting along is nonsense. Israel would like Iran to back off, stop the weapon transfers to Hezbollah and behave peacefully.
Imagine if Iran transferred books and university education to southern Lebanon, as opposed to weapons...imagine Iran building schools in Deir Ezzor, instead of bunkers...imagine Iran investing in music in Iraq, instead of militias.
Iran's regime every day wastes resources on missiles, drones, more missiles, militias, extremism...while Israel is plowing money into a diverse economy. Absolute waste by Iran on its region ambitions.
It's great and all that Iran helped fight ISIS. That was good...but what it has done with its influence after that was not helpful. Iran is not the only negative actor, Ankara also is aggressive. But in the end of the day Israel has zero interest in 'war'..
Israel would like the US administration to listen to its concerns about Iran's munitions transfers and threats. That's the big goal. Listen to concerns about the nuclear program and arming of militias and drone threats, etc. The 'war' narrative is bunk.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Frantzman

Seth Frantzman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sfrantzman

26 Jan
Key Biden admin calls to foreign leaders (blue) and National Security Advisor calls to foreign counterparts. Illustrating key places, countries, leaders the US is focused on.
You can read more here; and check out and follow @brett_mcgurk whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
Read 5 tweets
26 Jan
Will these beasts never learn;

I may write an analysis on this, it is not the first time and one must connect the dots.

jpost.com/israel-news/gr…
Another example of their meddling...dw.com/en/israeli-arm…
And we will never forget this scandal, who benefits? bbc.com/news/world-mid…
Read 5 tweets
25 Jan
News from Israel's IAI #IsraelDefenseNews "IAI will supply tens of millions of dollars of Heron MK II systems to an [unnamed] Asian country." #dronewars Important deal.
"The Heron MK II is the most advanced model of the Heron family. It reaches an altitude of 35,000 feet, a maximum speed of 140 knots and can stay in the air for up to 45 hours of flight." Can land at any type of airport and in extreme weather conditions.
"The most notable ability in the UAV is to perform standoff capability missions, gathering intelligence on targets from a long distance (tens of kilometers) without the need to cross a border line"
Read 6 tweets
18 Jan
Quick thoughts and thread on the recent barrage of articles seeking to push the view that all of Israel, and the West Bank, and Jerusalem and Gaza are “apartheid”...implications of this is to roll it out on eve of Biden admin to try to shift narrative (again)
First of all the whole “Zionism is racism” and “Israel is apartheid” has been a talking point for decades pushed first by the “anti-imperialist” crowd and then later in the 1990s after end of Cold War and end of actual apartheid in S. Africa.
Second this argument has shifted from seeking to encourage Israel to leave the “Occupied Palestinian Territories” which means Gaza and West Bank and East Jerusalem; to arguing all of Israel is “apartheid”
Read 25 tweets
15 Jan
I'm confused...A Newsweek report says there are "Shahed-136" drones in Yemen, a drone I've never heard of before...and then Israel's reports, based on Newsweek, turn them into "Shahed 129", both reports call them kamikaze drones...but Shahed 129 is a copy of a Predator? Confusing ImageImageImage
I'm all for articles about Iranian drones in Yemen...definitely there are Iranian-style drones and technology, the Qasef series, for instance. But what's up with the reports about the Shahed-136 and Shahed 129 and calling them loitering or kamikaze UAVs?
Here is the report; newsweek.com/iran-suicide-d…
Read 5 tweets
11 Jan
It’s interesting that when ISIS used social media and messaging platforms to coordinate a genocide and attacks in which thousands were murdered the big tech didn’t take those platforms off line. Was it just because they didn’t feel lives in Iraq and Syria were as important?
I remember in 2014 how open support of ISIS was, we learned later the group even used platforms to trade and sell slaves. Millions of pro-ISIS accounts were later closed but no one moved as quick as they did to stop Parler. That is interesting historically.
It took years to remove the ISIS extremist accounts between 2014 and 2017...I know because I followed and wrote about this issue and was in Sinjar after the genocide. It took just days to remove Parler.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!