An article was written by a senior Black male scientist, Hakeem Oluseyi, and it contained a very clear attack on Prof. Prescod-Weinstein, who is a queer Black agender woman, and an untenured Professor of theoretical cosmology and appointed in Women’s Studies.
The article was shared and lauded by many people, including scientists.

Did you read it before you shared it?
Were you okay with the bad arguments about not standing up for marginalized people?
Were you okay with the personal attack?
Did you recognize the gravity of this?
The power dynamic here is that a senior Black male scientist attacked a junior (untenured) Black woman scientist -- misogyny.

The junior woman scientist is a Black woman -- this is misogynoir.

It is beyond insidious.
It is as old as enslavement.
It is as new as every moment.
Misogynoir is everyone’s responsibility to understand and combat.

If you don’t understand, it’s time to ask why you don’t.

You live in it, and you perpetuate it if you don’t work to stop it.
There’s also a particular insidiousness in many communities regarding Black men committing misogynoir.

It’s one of the ways in which we uphold white supremacy by dehumanizing Black women.

When are we going to address this?
I’m feeling a little at a loss for words here.

How are we still letting this happen?

If it were a mistake of not reading the blog post before sharing it, what does that say about your consideration of the consequences of that seemingly small action?
If you read the post and still shared it, what does that say about your lack of understanding of how these dynamics work

... and how WE harm Black women with them?
If you shared the post and didn’t unshare after reading all of this,

... and didn’t own up to sharing it, what does it say about how you hold yourselves accountable?

About how we hold ourselves accountable in this community.
This is where we are: we’re here on social media having to call this out, educate, ask these questions.

Our community doesn’t hold itself accountable, except through us standing up for each other.
What does it say when we fail Black women so much and so deeply?

... when we leave them, leave Dr. Prescod-Weinstein, to fend for themselves?

For example, I should’ve posted this much earlier.
Why didn’t I?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with All the stars are closer

All the stars are closer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @iamstarnord

28 Jan
What would you expect to happen if your research community created an EDI Council that is composed of senior scientists who don't have a record of making just research environments and who haven't demonstrated skills in anti-racism?

#DiversityIndustrialComplex
What if this same community had earlier convened a group of community members but then refused to pay them appropriately to do that work?

#DiversityIndustrialComplex
What if half of this convened group from the community has no experience in creating just environments, and knows almost nothing about racism and other forms of bigotry?

#DiversityIndustryComplex
Read 6 tweets
1 Jun 20
I've been in science for many years.

For many years, I've pleaded and pushed for change.
I've taught myself how to organize communities in science healthily, because science sure as hell didn't teach me that.

I've learned how to respect my colleagues and create spaces where people can be who they are, where their humanity is prioritized over their productivity.
I've done concrete things and pushed the envelope.

I've served on some committees for hiring at different levels.

I've made suggestions about how to advertise and recruit, what to do to make the environment welcoming and inclusive.

Always told, change takes time.
Read 19 tweets
7 Jul 18
This is wrong ... and dangerous.

theguardian.com/technology/201…
"The machine intelligence tested in the research, which was published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and first reported in the Economist, was based on a sample of more than 35,000 facial images that men and women publicly posted on a US dating website. "
The training set is only 35,000 images, with 5 facial image per person.

Say it with me: "biased sample."
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!