What would you expect to happen if your research community created an EDI Council that is composed of senior scientists who don't have a record of making just research environments and who haven't demonstrated skills in anti-racism?
What if half of this convened group from the community has no experience in creating just environments, and knows almost nothing about racism and other forms of bigotry?
An article was written by a senior Black male scientist, Hakeem Oluseyi, and it contained a very clear attack on Prof. Prescod-Weinstein, who is a queer Black agender woman, and an untenured Professor of theoretical cosmology and appointed in Women’s Studies.
The article was shared and lauded by many people, including scientists.
Did you read it before you shared it?
Were you okay with the bad arguments about not standing up for marginalized people?
Were you okay with the personal attack?
Did you recognize the gravity of this?
For many years, I've pleaded and pushed for change.
I've taught myself how to organize communities in science healthily, because science sure as hell didn't teach me that.
I've learned how to respect my colleagues and create spaces where people can be who they are, where their humanity is prioritized over their productivity.
I've done concrete things and pushed the envelope.
I've served on some committees for hiring at different levels.
I've made suggestions about how to advertise and recruit, what to do to make the environment welcoming and inclusive.
"The machine intelligence tested in the research, which was published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and first reported in the Economist, was based on a sample of more than 35,000 facial images that men and women publicly posted on a US dating website. "
The training set is only 35,000 images, with 5 facial image per person.