I gave this guy the benefit of the doubt a few times, but there's no way to talk about "treasured US values" without stomping all over indigenous and Black struggles.
Not long ago this guy was arguing that drug users deserved violence while making a narrow "cultural" exception for alcohol, basically ignoring the ultra-racist US context.
Mr. "Anti-woke anti-ipdol" over here is trying to pull the "I'm a Latin American" card, blissfully unaware that I'm Peruvian and have traveled extensively within my country, including shanty towns.
One does not need to sound like some kind of bloodthirsty tradcath gushing about "American Traditional Values" to discuss sensible measures against the drug war.
Perhaps you should read Black MLs from the US before gushing about "Free Speech."
Anyway, I'm not veering deeper onto this incoherent and dogmatic "imitate China and Cuba for their drug laws but then push for US Free Speech Values" morass. I just didn't want to stay quiet about it.
Kennan's 1948 memo is an exceptionally revealing white supremacy manifesto, that very clearly defines that the threat is *Communism*, not some vague gushy non-ideological realpolitik battle for resources. history.state.gov/historicaldocu…
People will sit there and let Curtis pump libertarian sewage into their minds for two straight hours, then turn around and mourn gravely about massification and consumerism.
Following Adrian Zenz getting exposed a white supremacist religious fundamentalist, it became the #1 source on all matters China for the White Western Press.
Sanctions are the modern equivalent of medieval sieges.
Literally no different than catapults and armies parked outside the walls of an ancient city, choking off all trade, hoping that anger, disease, and hunger fester.
toads from the AP and The Economist are furious that China has a large Uyghur population from which to draw positive testimony to counter their latest wave of atrocity propaganda
"how *dare* China present happy Uyghurs to oppose our angry, CIA-funded, regime-change Uyghurs!? 🤬"
I was reading a (bad) essay on Mao Zedong by Zizek a while back, and this bit from him by it always stuck with me.
Zizek is literally quoting *Robert Conquest* (lol), but what made an impression was that the idea of the "subkulak" was so easily dismissed: lacan.com/zizmaozedong.h…