Here’s how fragile Democrats’ Senate majority is: The brief Tuesday hospitalization of Senate pro tem Patrick Leahy prompted nearly everyone in the Capitol to research Vermont’s Senate vacancy laws, just in case.
“You consider all the possibilities. And thank goodness none of them you have to worry about today. He’s doing just great,” Whip Durbin said of Leahy
50-50 Senate is a daily headache for the chief vote-counter: “You bet it is. It’s not just who’s well but who is present.”
“I’m glad he’s back. But it’s also a reminder than in an equally divided Senate how quickly things can change,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas).
Could a long-term absence shift power to GOP? “If someone was merely disabled but didn’t resign, then that would have that potential"
“I had some muscle spasms. And normally I would have said ‘to hell with it, to heck with it,’ but they didn't stop,” Leahy said. “I'm never comfortable talking about health matters.”
Leahy said "of course" he can serve full term and didn't rule out running again
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@lbarronlopez@marianne_levine “This is the smartest and best place for the president to start on his unity promises,” argued Sen. Capito. “That’s where I think the president has to show the leadership of what he has said he wants to do."
Sen. Portman told colleagues Dems/WH are "blowing it"
@lbarronlopez@marianne_levine Thune says coalition Rs "felt a little bit betrayed by the representations that they were getting about the Democrats’ intentions. And then having their leadership and the White House short-circuiting that and doing it all through reconciliation.”
@marianne_levine@meridithmcgraw Brian Jack, Trump’s former political director, quietly informed Senate Rs over the weekend that the 3rd-party thing is bunk.
Tump may play in primaries against those who convict them
More Cramer: “The Republican Party is still overwhelmingly supportive of this president.”
@marianne_levine@meridithmcgraw Almost no Senate Rs defending Trump. Tremendous contrast from last year's impeachment trial.
Braun, Barrasso indicate they won't hustle to cameras to defend Trump. Even Hawley says "The ex-president's rhetoric on the day was inflammatory. I think it was irresponsible."
In interview, Manchin is emphatic: there’s no circumstance he would vote to gut filibuster. he pledges to McConnell he “will not” vote to blow it up over the next two years
“I hope with that guarantee in place he will work in a much more amicable way.”
Some Democrats say if Republicans block Democrats’ priorities, it’s worth preserving the ability to change the rules later. Asked if there is any scenario that would change his mind, he replied: “None whatsoever that I will vote to get rid of the filibuster.”
“I'm in the same place I've always been. Busting the filibuster under any conditions is wrong. We can organize the Senate. I’m sure we can work through that. If he knows as strongly as I feel about it?” Manchin said of McConnell.
@lbarronlopez Collins concerned some families earning $300K can get checks
“That was a general issue that was expressed around a number of things: The more targeted the assistance can be where it's needed most, the more helpful,” said Sen. Shaheen.
@lbarronlopez The $1.9 trillion topline number is an issue too.
“This isn’t monopoly money,” says Sen. King
"administration clearly is very eager to move very quickly. And we want to make sure that there is justification, especially since there's so much money remaining," Sen. Collins adds
Schumer says impeachment trial will start in two weeks, as requested by McConnell and supported by Biden.
This also helps Biden's Cabinet. He locks in Yellen's confirmation vote for Monday
Impeachment schedule:
Jan. 25: Exhibition of article
Jan. 26: Swearing in of senators, issuance of summons
Feb. 2: President’s answer to article, House’s pre-trial brief
Feb. 8: President’s pre-trial brief
Feb. 9: Due date for House’s pre-trial rebuttal brief ... trial begins
Technically this is a few days before McConnell requested, so he gave a little bit here. Nevertheless he's happy
"This is a win for due process and fairness," says @DougAndres
Senate GOP campaign chair Rick Scott says he’ll protect Republican incumbents from challenges, even if it’s Ivanka vs. Rubio or a Trump-backed challenge to Thune. Story soon
“I’m supporting the incumbents,” Scott said. He has no insight into Ivanka v. Rubio
“Nobody has talked to me about it at all. Nobody. I’ve tried to call around. Nobody’s said anything about Florida,” Scott said.
Scott said he did not regret his vote objecting to Pa. Electoral College results and that it hasn't hurt fundraising. Here's what he said about Rs that might convict Trump
“Everybody will have to decide on their own. I think we ought to focus on where we’re going, not the past"