I once interviewed a policeman during Blair's term. Off camera, he told me that he had been turned into a kind of social worker. We had to be creative to find a way of saying it on camera so that he didn't get fired.
It's an interesting contrast. The policeman I interviewed explained that Blair's "respect" agenda had set people against each other, and the Police against the community.
Some cops now seem to think that's a good thing. What Blair stood for was the criminalisation of everything.
Some people are simply delighted about the pandemic.
I think it's that simple.
They don't care about the antagonisms that it creates.
It's okay -- they can criminalise the other side in the antagonism for the good of society. Problem over.
Back in the early-mid '00s, that Policeman really surprised me. He was smart. A very ordinary community Policeman. But smarter than I realised even then. Unfortunately, I think he was rare.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"The survey was conducted by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), analysts at the University of Oxford, and NGO partners using a new approach: mobile gaming."
Seriously...
"From October 7 to December 4, 2020, advertisements in popular mobile games like Angry Birds and Words With Friends were replaced by the survey in 17 languages. "
That's not how "the people" express their voices, Greenpeace.
I'm guessing here, but I don't think the authors of this article have much experience in engineering or installing home heating systems, and I don't get the impression that they are particularly interested in hearing criticisms from those that do, either.
These are wonks.
They 'research' 'innovation', but ultimately believe that R&D is just a question of policy and funding.
It's political will alone that will make airsource heat pumps viable, you see. And you'll have one, whether or not you want one, or you will freeze.
This is a remarkable admission that the thing lacking from the climate agenda is democracy, and that the likes of WEF and Davos man want to find a way around that problem without resorting to actually testing 'collective will'.
"Our main focus is to identify key stakeholders, whether from the corporate world, whether from NGOs, who really get that and really want to push the boundaries to do transformative work, and to hopefully create an unstoppable force".
Rather than asking people want they want.
It's not enough for these resetters and better-builders to set out their pitch, and to persuade people, through democracy, to make the world a 'better' place.