- No criteria by which potential solutions can be measured
- The problem space is not clearly defined
- The knowledge resources required are not immediately available, or exist in different categories...
Sounds like teaching to me!...
In other words, learning how to be an expert teacher is like learning how to design a skyscraper.
1000s of different elements, each requiring a HUGE amount of knowledge...
But, to an expert teacher, the ill-structured problem of teaching is just a succession of well-structured problems (WSP) or problems with clear easily available solutions...
💡To transform an ISP into a WSP requires lots of procedural knowledge: 'How does a person working in this area usually split up and solve a problem of this sort?' Once this knowledge has been applied, then different aspects of the problem can be tackled separately...
Here's the rub: the aim of a coach is to turn the ill-structured problem of teaching into a large series of well-structured problems.
Coaches help novice teachers solve the problem of teaching, one small set at a time.
🔥For expert teachers, teaching is a well-structured problem.
❓The burning question: what are the mechanisms required to turn an ISP into a WSP for a teacher?
Answering this also answers the question of what makes GREAT instructional coaching and CPD.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm obsessed with this paper - probably talk about it too much TBH - and here's why
... 🧵
Kennedy is writing in response to a 'Lemovian' approach that focuses overtly on teacher moves...
I certainly don't have a problem with this approach (far from it!), BUT...
💡"When we define teaching by the visible practices we see, without attending to the role these practices have in the overall lesson, novices are likely to use their newly acquired practices at the wrong times, in the wrong places, or for the wrong reason."...
Lots of schools argue that coaching pairs should be Novice - - > Expert, or that teachers should be exclusively paired with subject specialists.
💡Insight:
Papay and colleagues argue that coaches should be matched with teachers around specific skills. For example, a teacher that is weak in behaviour management is paired with an expert in this area.
There's significant evidence that this method has a real impact.