This weekend marks the 15th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Samuel Alito.

He has been an eloquent voice for the Constitution over the last 15 years, and #SCOTUS has been better for it. (1/X)
#SCOTUS has never been more protective of religious freedom in its history. Justice Alito’s consistency and leadership on that issue made that possible. He wrote the Court’s opinions in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014) & Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru (2020). (2/X)
In Our Lady of Guadalupe, which held that courts can’t second-guess a religious school’s determination as to who should teach religion, the Court adopted the standard he laid out in his prescient concurrence eight years earlier in Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC. (3/X)
Justice Alito has also been a defender of political speech under the First Amendment and the individual right to bear arms under the Second Amendment, the author of the Court’s opinion in McDonald v. Chicago (2010). (4/X)
He has opposed freewheeling policy choices under the guise of deciding cases—see his strong dissent last year in Bostock v. Clayton County. Equally important, he has consistently respected federalism and the separation of powers, without which our freedom would be in peril. (5/X)
So let’s toast Justice Alito on 15 years of faithfully defending the Constitution! 🥂

May the Court and country be blessed with 15 more years—and then some! (6/X)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Carrie Severino

Carrie Severino Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JCNSeverino

17 Dec 20
.@SenWhitehouse has anointed himself the unofficial arbiter on judicial independence and so called "captured courts"—or at least when it comes to judges appointed by Republican presidents. /1
But when his best friend, Rhode Island District Judge Jack McConnell, pens a partisan op-ed railing against DACA (litigation about which, by the way, is currently ongoing), it's nothing but crickets from Senator Whitehouse. /2

providencejournal.com/story/opinion/…
Is anyone really surprised? This is the way it always is with Senator Whitehouse.

"Judicial independence for thee but not for me."

"Dark money for me but not for thee." /3
Read 6 tweets
21 Oct 20
The numbers are in.

It’s clear that Americans want Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, and they do not want to increase the number of justices on the Court. /1

int.nyt.com/data/documentt…
But if Joe Biden wins and the Democrats take the Senate on Election Day, we can be certain that they will make packing the Supreme Court a high priority. /2
If the Democrats succeed, they will pack the Court with liberal justices who will use the Court as a vehicle to implement their liberal policy positions.

Just like the Left wants, Supreme Court justices will look a lot more like politicians than judges. /3
Read 4 tweets
15 Oct 20
This week, the country had the opportunity to get to know Judge Amy Coney Barrett.

They got to hear from Judge Barrett in her own words, and see firsthand what an incredible Supreme Court justice she will be. /1
Senate Democrats were relentless this week in their quest to get Judge Barrett to weigh in on their campaign issues, and signal how she would approach cases that might come before her. /2
But through hours of questioning, Judge Barrett proved herself to be unflappable. She was continually gracious and poised as she patiently explained that she could not, in the words of Justice Kagan, provide a "thumbs up or thumbs down" on Supreme Court cases as a nominee. /3
Read 7 tweets
13 Oct 20
THE GINSBURG STANDARD

Like then-Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg when she was nominated in 1993, Judge Barrett should decline to answer any questions about issues that may come before her on the Supreme Court. /1
Ginsburg famously said that a “judge sworn to decide impartially can offer no forecasts, no hints,” about how she would rule on a case, “for that would show not only disregard for the specifics of the particular case, it would display disdain for the entire judicial process.” /2
Since then, *every* Supreme Court nominee has applied what has become known as the “Ginsburg Standard.” /3
Read 6 tweets
12 Oct 20
One after another today, Senate Democrats are claiming that Judge Barrett would strike down Obamacare and jeopardize healthcare for millions of Americans.

This is just a baseless and false attack. /1
It is absurd to suggest that Judge Barrett—a mother of seven children, one of whom has special needs—is insensitive to the healthcare needs of normal Americans. /2
Judge Barrett has *never* said that she would strike down Obamacare. /3
Read 6 tweets
11 Oct 20
Judge Amy Coney Barrett on life and the law. /1
/2
/3
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!