I got three smart friends on a call to try and make sense of the $GME situation. This thread is my current best model.
TL;DR: The longs are playing the short game, the shorts are playing the long game.
Who's long GME? Some combination of WSBers, FOMOists, and hedge funds. The WSBers have no fear and will sell at $0.01 or on the moon when the shorts are gone. FOMOists may panic if GME slides but they're probably a small fraction. Funds will try to get on top and may have hedges.
The interesting Q is who's short. Someone who's short for 50% of their bankroll is vulnerable to a squeeze, but at 2% they can hold on forever. Current borrowing fee is 31% APR, or 0.1% a day. It's not that bad. So if the shorts are distributed they can wait it out.
The fact that short interest stayed fixed at 71M probably means that many want to short and are constrained by the number of shares available to borrow (naked shorts are negligible). If a short cashes out, another short-seller will just come in $1 higher.
WSBers can hold the line but can't push higher without new money that would take some of these 71M shares out of borrowing circulation. Or hope that the shorts are actually vulnerable and will cover-buy in a panic upwards. They need something dramatic to happen soon.
One dramatic thing that could happen is that people who sold call options for tomorrow aren't already hedged and will need to buy tomorrow to deliver the shares. It's unclear if that's realistic, most option sellers are market makers who don't stay exposed for long.
The shorts, if they came in at high prices (likely given the huge volume this week) and if they're not reckless just need to wait it out. Eventually the longs will either get bored or turn on each other — with no squeeze this becomes just a pyramid scheme.
I think that GME getting taken off retail brokerages, even if it's for a day, really hurt WSB. If the shorts aren't knocked out tomorrow morning by a huge flood of FOMO retail buys, I think they'll win over the next weeks.
In a siege metaphor, the longs are in the castle and the shorts are besieging. It's comfier inside the walls than outside and the resolve is strong, but supplies are running out. They need the cavalry to come and lift the siege, but who knows if it's coming?
Also, I apologize to everyone who sees this saga as a heroic morality play, I didn't mean to rain on your fire with cold financial analysis. If that story is alive for you it shouldn't depend on minutiae like $GME's short borrowing fees or even its share price. Live beautifully.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On 12/31 the short interest on GME was 71M shares (out of 69M outstanding 🤷♂️). In January a billion (!) shares of GME have been traded, Melvin and Citron closed their positions, and the short interest is... still 71M.
Does it still count as a short squeeze if the original shorts got squeezed out but then millions of new short-sellers ran in to take their place on the battlefront? Has this ever happened?
This is not about two small funds caught in a trap anymore, it's an all-out war of attrition with $20B staked on either side. My guess is that most of it is institution $, WSB being a small part of the longs. When the line breaks, the big boys will dump faster that the Redditors.
I expect a strong resistance line for $GME at $420.69, there's no way every WSB-tard didn't put a sell order there so they could post a screenshot 😂🤣
Another fun thing is that as $GME's price 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗱𝗿𝘂𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗱, cheap out of the money puts two weeks from now (which yours truly may have dabbled in) became 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 expensive. The market says that the higher it soars the faster it will fall.
Yep. If you have a giant short you need to set an alert for your target being mentioned on Reddit that would automatically trigger buying enough far-out call options to protect you. If Melvin was too slow or greedy to do this they deserve what happened.
Rationality sets the stage by centering the map-territory distinction. You don't have to believe in miracles out in intersubjective reality to have crazy things in your map. But Rationality preaches incremental, Bayesian updates with every piece of data. Our minds can't do that.
PP says that we change our minds like Kuhn's theory of science. Errors of prediction accumulate until a great paradigm shift changes the top models all at once. It happens even at small scales, with basic perception: putanumonit.com/2021/01/23/con…
𝐅𝐨𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐑𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐑𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐦
A thought experimental thread
🧠🧪🧵
Does intuition enlighten or mislead? Depends. In ordered contexts with fast feedback (chess), intuition works well. In chaotic multivariate contexts (penny stock picking) it fails.
The problem is that in the latter case you'll still think you're learning things, overfit transient patterns, and be overconfident in your future prediction ability. This is @nntaleb's main point in "Fooled by Randomness".
Now let's bring predictive processing into the picture.
PP tells us there are three ways you make you predictions match sensory input: 1. Change your underlying models and their predictions based on what you see. 2. Change your perception to fit with what you predicted. 3. Act on the world to bring the two into alignment.
Last year I did a @threadapalooza of overly general life advice. This year it's time to focus on what's really important and give the people what they want.
1 like = 1 thing you should know about the best game no one besides me is playing, Random Dice!
1. Random Dice is a competitive, real-time, deck building tower defense game. All four of those attributes are common to many games, but it's their combination that makes RD special. You have to be good at strategy AND quick thinking, analysis AND intuition, to be good at it.
2. Important up top: it's FtP, but you'd probably want to spend about $50 to enjoy it fully. I've spent around $100 and 300 hours on it, which is a pretty good deal. Or, you can read this mega thread and git so gud you can play forever with no more spend (as I am at this point).
The market moved about 1% back and forth on a 10% swing in election odds, implying that a Biden presidency is worth a 10% higher stock market than Trump.
If you remember, the same thing happened in 2016 with the market moving against Trump odds all night until 4 am on election night when everyone decided Trump is actually good for stocks and it shot up. putanumonit.com/2016/11/16/fli…
There's was some talk of the market pricing in a contested election in 2016 but those numbers never added up. That night in was the clearest example I've seen of the efficient market hypothesis being violated. Fortunes will be made and lost tonight as well.