Share this page!

Matthew Gertz Profile picture
Twitter logo
29 Jan, 4 tweets, 2 min read
This seems great! nytimes.com/2021/01/29/hea…
(Not great is how far down I need to scroll in an article whose headline stresses the vaccine’s lower efficacy against the South Africa strain to find that paragraph!)
Headline/lede/20th paragraph
100% reduction in hospitalizations and deaths is a big deal!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Matthew Gertz

Matthew Gertz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MattGertz

Matthew Gertz Profile picture
28 Jan
This is incoherent. It would be useful for the New York Times editorial board to lay out which of these executive actions they specifically think Biden shouldn't have done. That they don't bother to do so is telling.
The closest they get is this paragraph about how protections for DREAMers would be more durable if they were legislated. No shit, that's why that's included in Biden's immigration plan. Should he not have done this in the interim? They don't say.
The Times doesn't say that any of these executive actions exceeded Biden's authority, and indeed most of them are repealing previous Trump EOs. Why would the proper mechanism for doing that be legislation?
Read 9 tweets
Matthew Gertz Profile picture
26 Jan
These major companies said they would stop donating to GOP members of Congress who sought to overturn the 2020 election results -- but are still running ads on Fox News:
@amazon
@att
@BCBSAssociation
@comcast
@dell
@LillyPad
@pfizer
@sanofi
@Walgreens
mediamatters.org/fox-news/these…
These companies said they would pause all PAC contributions in light of the January 6 insurrection -- but are still running ads on Fox News:
@CharlesSchwab
@GM
@jpmorgan
@kroger
@AskLiberty
@novonordisk mediamatters.org/fox-news/these…
This work builds on the great journalism from Popular Information’s @JuddLegum and Tesnim Zekeria. popular.info/p/three-major-…
Read 7 tweets
Matthew Gertz Profile picture
26 Jan
We've reached the "Fox primetime hosts defend QAnon adherents without ever mentioning what they actually believe" portion of the network's desperate grab for ratings. mediamatters.org/qanon-conspira…
mediamatters.org/laura-ingraham…
You can imagine a world where Fox hosts used their unique credibility with their right-wing audience to warn them away from dangerous extremism, but that's not where this is going.
Here's me last August predicting that Fox hosts would inevitably end up claiming that the danger of QAnon was blown out of proportion by Democrats and the media and that it was all an attack on run-of-the-mill Trump supporters. mediamatters.org/qanon-conspira…
Read 4 tweets
Matthew Gertz Profile picture
21 Jan
You spend years working your way up at CBS and CNN, you jump to Fox News, spend a decade there, you become chief White House correspondent, then finally you get your own afternoon show, which you use to do... this.
Pretty grim stuff from Fox's "news" side today.
OH GOD IT GOT; WORSE
Read 4 tweets
Matthew Gertz Profile picture
21 Jan
Folks.
This is, I think, supposed to be one of Fox's "news" shows? Hard to tell since the shakeup.
It is extremely important not to take people like this seriously.
Read 4 tweets
Matthew Gertz Profile picture
21 Jan
This is a constant refrain on Fox, as I discuss here: mediamatters.org/fox-news/fox-n…
.@pbump is correct that the rhetorical move Republicans and right-wing media are using is reminiscent of their "deplorables" backlash. Another case: their freak-out over the 2009 DHS report on right-wing extremism mediamatters.org/sean-hannity/c…
@pbump The report in question was about violent extremism, but right-wing media claimed it was actually an attack on their viewers, a way to silence them.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @MattGertz has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @MattGertz!

Read all threads by @MattGertz