THREAD ➡️ President Biden has just issued an unprecedented number of foolish and economically destructive executive orders. So much for unity. You might be wondering how he is allowed to do this. After all, America isn't a dictatorship and the president doesn't make laws.
Put simply: Congress. Every president issues guidance to the executive branch. That's normal. But when Congress passes bad, vague, or imprecise laws, it opens up space that executive orders fill. In other words, Congress enables presidential discretion.
This is THE biggest problem with Congress today. You may have heard that America has three coequal branches. This is wrong. Congress is the dominant branch of government. We are the first branch, and we have the most power over the other two.
Our constitution is designed to have Congress at the center. We are supposed to be making laws and directing the government. The president and the federal courts are empowered to check Congress, but they are not supposed to replace our legislative authority.
So what happens when Congress decides not to play its part? First, the other branches step in to fill the space. Courts legislate from the bench. The president and bureaucracy tackle problems and policy however they like.
In the short term, this behavior wins the praise of partisans. But in the longer term it creates instability and chaos in our constitutional system. Every single election, the disposition of the entire federal government changes on a dime, across a wide range of issues.
That hurts the economy, it sows confusion among citizens, and it often helps the powerful and the connected at the expense of everybody else. That, in turn, raises the stakes for each election - because seemingly everything turns on the outcome.
President Biden is blowing through norms with the sheer volume and scope of these executive orders. That's wrong. But it shouldn't be surprising. The next president, regardless of party, will probably do the same thing.
This is not a cheap partisan jab: I made this exact same criticism of the previous administration and voted against Trump's use of emergency executive authority because it ignored Congress's clear constitutional authority to appropriate money.
If we want to stop this chaotic way of governing, if we want to make politics more reasonable, we can't have a giant gap in the heart of our Constitution. Congress has to do its job. Here are some thoughts on how to force Congress to do its job. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD ➡️ 76 years ago today, tens of thousands of Americans, along with our allies, displayed unparalleled courage on the beaches and causeways of Normandy, beginning the long process of liberating Europe from Nazi rule.
The extraordinary sacrifices made on that day of days did not come out of thin air. In the 1930s, deterrence failed, our adversaries saw a free world unwilling to impose costs on aggression, and democracies were late to mobilize against the Nazi war machine.
The war was a terrible lesson that American needed to defend forward. No longer could we sit back across the ocean and let the storm clouds gather. In the ensuing decades, our forward presence won the Cold War by successfully deterring a Soviet invasion of Western Europe.
I’m looking forward to hearing from @EsperDoD today, because what we’ve been told so far doesn’t make a lot of sense. Erdogan has been threatening to invade Syria for years now and I’m not sure why we acquiesced after he allegedly gave 48-hours notice.
In other words, the presence of American service members has successfully helped deter the Turks from taking this kind of action in the past. It’s unclear why this would have suddenly changed, and it suggests that ultimately, Erdogan was bluffing.
If, however, Erdogan was not bluffing, we have even bigger problems because it would mean would-be aggressors do not fear American retaliation. Ask yourself: would Erdogan have felt comfortable risking the lives of 50 Russian service members?
THREAD ➡️ With major NATO meetings this week, allied defense leaders must heed this warning about threats from Chinese-developed 5G networks. washingtonpost.com/world/national…
So far, mainstream concerns with firms like Huawei have focused on espionage concerns. Given high-profile examples like the African Union headquarters, this focus is understandable. But as the letter describes, espionage is only one of three broad concerns with PRC-supplied 5G.
One of these concerns is the security of future military operations. DoD is currently considering how it could leverage 5G networks to share intelligence or push the immense amounts of data used in military operations. If these networks are Chinese, they're unlikely to be secure.
We all want to see the North Korean crisis resolved diplomatically and the administration deserves enormous credit for the maximum pressure campaign. In the last 16 months alone, @POTUS has designated more North Korean entities for sanctions than in the previous 8 years.
But unless the subsequent Pompeo-led negotiations compel the Kim regime to make new & concrete concessions, count me a skeptic when it comes to whether yesterday’s agreement advanced the ball down the field toward CVID in any meaningful way.
In fact, a few things seem obvious causes for greater skepticism:
1) Any drawn-out process plays to North Korea's and China’s advantage, as it saps energy from the maximum pressure campaign and allows Kim to create pressure for peace at any price.