1/ Novavax UK first:
~90% protection again any symptomatic COVID-19. And that high level of protection was accomplished under conditions of very intense community transmission in the UK, which is a high bar. 1/n
bit.ly/3oEpann
2/ (i.e., most likely a higher bar for protection than USA summer transmission, or anywhere with low level SARS2 transmission). And that was under conditions of high prevalence of the "UK variant" (B117), which is significantly more transmissible than the parental SARS2 strain.
3/ The Novavax vaccine was quite protective against both the parental strain and the UK variant, which is welcome news.
4/ The Novavax UK Phase 3 trial does not have sufficient cases of severe disease to make statements about that, but given their data and all that we know from the other vaccine trials, the Novavax vaccine is likely to show even more protection against severe or fatal COVID-19,
5/ presumably being almost 100% effective against severe or fatal COVID-19 with the parental strain or the UK variant. All of that is very impressive, and welcome news.
ir.novavax.com/static-files/1…
6/ It was also excellent that the Novavax UK trial had 27% participants over the age of 65.
7/ The Novavax vaccine is a protein vaccine, so it is different from the RNA vaccine and viral vector approaches. It is great to have three different vaccine modalities show success.
nytimes.com/interactive/20…
8/ It adds to the total vaccine doses that will be available worldwide, and it is a valuable to have diverse pathways to success to hedge against any future challenges that may emerge for any single vaccine. Tough to overstate how important that is globally.
9/ I, and others, predicted vaccine efficacy against the UK variant would be similar to that against the 'original' SARS2, particularly after the recent wave of pre-prints on antibodies recognizing B117. But, expectations are just expectations...
10/ The Novavax UK trial proved that a strong immune response to original SARS2 Spike is also protective against the UK variant, which is fantastic to see!
11/ There may be a quantifiable difference in the protection, but so far it appears to be statistically insignificant, and biologically it is a minor point compared to the bottom line results of ~90% efficacy at preventing COVID-19.
12/ The Novavax vaccine also uses a newer adjuvant, Matrix-M1, which is an ISCOMs-type adjuvant. It is great to see another adjuvant class prove efficacious and safe in humans.
13/ We have used ISCOMs adjuvants in a number of pre-clinical vaccine studies in our HIV vaccine consortium CHAVD (such as the paper below), and I have been impressed by ISCOMs adjuvants.
14/ Safety: It will be good to see the detailed safety data, but the initial report for the Phase 3 UK trial looks very good, and consistent with earlier good vaccine safety data.
15/ Bottom line, the Novavax COVID-19 vaccine is another big win for humanity in the battle against COVID-19!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shane Crotty

Shane Crotty Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @profshanecrotty

30 Jan
1/ Now for the thornier data.
2/ I covered the great news from the Novavax COVID vaccine UK Phase 3 trial.
3/ I covered the excellent news from the J&J COVID vaccine Phase 3 international trials.
Read 28 tweets
29 Jan
1/ J&J COVID-19 vaccine. Single dose Ad26 (adenoviral).

Another important COVID-19 vaccine success!

Topline J&J vaccine efficacy reported to be 100% against serious cases of COVID-19 more than 28 days after immunization. Those are big!
1/n

bit.ly/3tb7K5d
2/ That includes USA, Latin Amer, and South Africa study sites. It will be important to see more data, because the initial press release was definitely thin on data. But, initial report 72% efficacy against "moderate to severe" disease. That is good for a single dose immunization
3/ The J&J COVID-19 vaccine generated good immune responses in people after one immunization, but there was a substantial boost to the antibody response after a 2nd immunization. A 4x gain. (T cell responses after the 2nd dose were not reported)
nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NE…
Read 15 tweets
12 Jan
1/ Here's my review on adaptive immunity to COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2. I hope you find it useful. It was a lot of work. Thanks to Prof Alex Sette @SetteLab and others for direct contributions and broader input over the year!
cell.com/cell/fulltext/… @CellCellPress Image
2/ And thanks to all of the amazing scientists and labs around the world that have done so much work making incredible progress on these challenging COVID-19 immunology topics in the past year!
3/ FYI, here's the right version of Figure 1. It should be updated in the next version posted online. Image
Read 5 tweets
9 Jan
1/ “I think this [study] is really important because there is a lot of fear and uncertainty at the moment about this specific question.”

“[the results are] not surprising, but it’s been really important to see some data.” 

washingtonpost.com/health/2021/01…
2/ Definitely good news to see these data on the Pfizer vaccine working against the 501 variant. If anything, the vaccine works better against this variant.
biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
3/ It isn't the end of the story, because the UK / SA variants have mutations in addition to 501, but these vaccine data are an important piece of the puzzle. As noted in the article, more is expected from labs in the coming weeks, but these results are expected & encouraging.
Read 4 tweets
9 Jan
1/ One pre-print on B117 viral loads (i.e., B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 ) found substantially higher viral loads (median 10-100 times). Another UK study found 3 times higher viral loads in people with B117 (Bonsall/Golubchik study).
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

coronavirus-fraser-group.org/files/files/up…
2/
3/
Read 7 tweets
6 Jan
1.  Our COVID-19 paper on Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection is out today in @ScienceMagazine !
science.sciencemag.org/content/early/…
@ljiresearch @SetteLab @Dani6020
2. The immune system can remember viruses. And there are multiple different parts of the immune system that can remember a virus in different ways, so the immune system can fight the virus in multiple ways.
3. Our data shows that the body’s immune system remembers novel coronavirus for at least 8 months after COVID-19, and multiple different branches of the immune system remember the virus.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!