Damasio in his book 'The Strange Order of Things' argues that the core of condition lies in homeostasis. I agree with this generalization. But let me work out in a tweet storm how consciousness relates to homeostasis.
Human consciousness is related to awareness of surprising or threatening observations. It's an error-correcting mechanism that lends attention to discrepancies of our expectations of the world.
The mind is composed of many layers of cognition. Also, its massive parallelism implies reducing the conditional checks required for error correction.
To do this, consciousness is engaged only in a time-sliced manner in a periodic manner. The majority of time spent is in unconscious activity with only periodic activation of the conscious error-correcting process.
The system 1 unconscious intuitive mechanism minimizes the effort of performing error correction. It is automated and driven by habit. It is like a river flowing without obstructions.
In the cognitive state of flow, where there is a combination of challenge and mastery, consciousness resides mostly in the background. That is because mastery implies automated and competent thought. The kind that can anticipate errors and rarely makes a mistake.
It takes a while to wrap your head around the idea that consciousness itself is an unconscious process. It is that system 1 process that focuses its attention on relevant information flowing in the unconscious.
The conscious process itself is unconscious. This should not be a surprising conclusion.
Homeostasis for complex brains requires the development of a self-reflective System 2 process. Consciousness is sequential cognition, but each step in that sequence is a System 1 process.
Complex minds have many homeostatic processes, there are in constant collaboration with each other. One can think of a homeostatic process as a kind of self. Complex minds have many selves. The narrative self, driven to diet, can override the hunger needs of the bodily self.
For a body to balance in motion, a mind must be able to solve a constraint problem that involves multiple forces. In the same manner, the mind is solving a constraint problem between different motivations of the various selves.
Consciousness is that grand central station where there is a convergence of relevant information across many self models. It provided the consensus model so a body may act as one.
Minds construct themselves by interacting with their environment. Each self constructs a sophisticated model to maintain homeostasis.
Homeostasis thus is the preservation of a state that is defined by a higher-level abstractions. The social self as an example is driven by motivations like care, compassion power and connectedness.
An informative way of understanding the interactions of various selves is through the use of a wardley map.
We can construct a Wardley map of the relationships of various selves. Also informative is the relationship of various stages of spiral dynamics.
Expanded further in this blog entry: medium.com/intuitionmachi…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Carlos E. Perez

Carlos E. Perez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IntuitMachine

31 Jan
Daniel Dennett describes symmetry breaking using the neologism 'strange inversion of reasoning'. He describes theories from Darwin, Turing and Hume as examples of these.
Competence without comprehension is shared by Darwin and Turing's theories. Hume argues that habitual anticipation is how humans recognize causality. Habits lead to competence. Comprehension is an illusion.
Intuition involves the unconscious. It is below our conscious awareness. It is unknown for the conscious, but known for the unconscious. It is the unknown known.
Read 13 tweets
29 Jan
What can we learn from $GME about investing. The key take away that the trade that can set you up for life can be found with good research and positioning months before the actual event.
It mirrors the Big Short movie where several researchers came to the same conclusion. Coincidentally, Michael Burry was involved in both trades.
But it's conceptually the same thing. A lot of institutional investors crowding together on the wrong side of a trade. In the Big Short it was emergent risk created by the housing bubble. For GME it was the excessive bets against a company far from bankruptcy.
Read 9 tweets
29 Jan
I've suspected that this is true. I hypothesize that it's related to a culture that is more verbal than empathetic. Anyone have studies on this?
We have to first admit that Americans have their own unique culture. Individualism, distrust of authority, pragmatism, not knowing how to do nothing, verbal orientation, etc. combine to create a kind of personality that perhaps creates a natural inhibition for 'real talk'.
Facebook epitomizes and maginfies this personality for all to see. What is seen in FB are the lives of the idealized self of its users. It shows only a world of perfection. An image of oneself that self-actualization is reached by doing more stuff than anyone else.
Read 5 tweets
28 Jan
The interview with CNBC of @chamath is a much watch because there is so much insight hidden underneath.
There are many things that caught my attention. The one thing was the abstraction that hedge fund strategies are all 'momentum' plays. What it seems to imply is that the marshaling of resources at an opportune time drives the future behavior of a stock.
From basic physics, we know that momentum is mass times velocity. So any 'momentum' tactic employs the variation of mass, velocity or both. Wrt stocks, mass is money and velocity is speed of trade.
Read 27 tweets
27 Jan
Constructivism is perhaps the most important idea that will shape the future of humanity. The ills of society are a consequence of the willful ignorance of constructivism.
There are two important definitions of constructivism, one comes from mathematics and the other from psychology. The mathematical definition leads rejects the law of excluded middle. It's relevant in understanding causation.
The psychological definition: "Humans actively construct their own knowledge, and that reality is determined by our experiences as a learner."
Read 34 tweets
27 Jan
@gershbrain Almost there. Just as the word 'create' glosses over too many things, the word 'generalize' does that too. What is need is an idea that straddles between the two.
@gershbrain Your argument against create employs a degenerate notion of create (i.e. brute force copying)(degenerate in the math and physics sense). The notion of creation is that there is some competence (however developed) that leads to the replication of the features of the target system.
@gershbrain But in this word create, is an entire logic of constructivism. An intuitionistic logic to more precise. The cognitive dissonance in the quote is that Feynman was a theoretical physicist.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!