I have worked with lunar samples but I don’t remember smelling anything. The astronauts who were there reported that it smelled like gunpowder. Our belief is that on the Moon the minerals have broken chemical bonds on their surfaces that activate our smell sensation, BUT... 1/2
2/ ...when lunar samples are exposed to air, the molecules bond with those locations on the minerals, passivating their surfaces, so they lose the gunpowder smell. In Houston the samples are stored in dry nitrogen but no gas is perfectly pure so passivation is inevitable I guess.
3/ This is the story we tell, but I’m not totally sure about the details. It raises the question how did the dust retain its smell as the Lunar Module was re-pressurized and the crew removed their helmets to smell it? Was the air still dry enough, even as sweat was evaporating?
4/ I should also mention how these “dangling bonds” on the surfaces of minerals formed in the first place. If you put rock in a vacuum chamber here on Earth, it won’t suddenly develop this gunpowder smell all on its own. The reason we believe it happened on the Moon is because...
5/ ...the lunar surface environment has a lot of energetic physics that can break chemical bonds, including super harsh ultraviolet light, lots of cosmic radiation, and the charged particles blowing in the solar wind. (Image: NASA)
6/ This happens on the lunar surface, but not on Earth’s, because here we are protected by a thick atmosphere & magnetosphere that stop most cosmic rays, block the solar wind, and filter out most ultraviolet light. Air also serves as a pathway for electric charges to dissipate.
7/ So we think the smell of lunar dust is the result of “space weathering” which happens on airless bodies like the Moon. There is a LOT we don’t understand about space weathering. We DO know it changes not only the smell but also the color of minerals. (Source: @IntrplnetSarah)
8/ Space weathering generally turns regolith redder by diminishing the reflectance of minerals at the shorter wavelengths, i.e., in the bluer end of the spectrum. (psrd.hawaii.edu/Aug09/solarwin…)
9/ It is important to understand space weathering for many reasons. Example: when we compare meteorites on Earth to asteroids in space, the reflected colors don’t look the same. The weathered surfaces burned off as the meteorites entered our atmosphere.(livescience.com/amp/27183-aste…)
9/ As a result we cannot do direct comparison of meteorites with the asteroids and it is difficult to know what the asteroids are made of. This hurts our ability to unravel the history of the asteroids and understand our own context in this solar system. (solarsystem.nasa.gov/resources/1980…)
10/ One of the major goals of returning astronauts to the surface of the Moon is to study space weathering. This will help us understand all airless bodies, not just the Moon. So when we go back and smell that gunpowder smell, we will be asking what processes made it this way?
10(a)/ Thread repair. Somehow I usually break the thread 🤦‍♂️. But it continues from this point:
11/11 So our goals in returning to the Moon are central to our understanding of humanity’s context in the overall Solar System. How did we get here? How our is home changing? What will its future be? The smell of moondust is a deeper question than it may at first seem.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Phil Metzger

Dr. Phil Metzger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrPhiltill

29 Jan
Great article explaining why there’s no reason to assume anything beyond natural process for ‘Oumuamua. The preprint (not paywalled) is here: arxiv.org/pdf/1907.01910…
Not an expert here, but I asked astronomers in our faculty group and they tell me that the extreme light curve might not be entirely due to ‘Oumuamua’s shape. For example, it could be a contact binary where one lobe is a brighter material than the other lobe. Compare Arrokoth:
3/ If different parts of the object have different albedos, then it might be less than 6-to-1 in elongation. So the light curve that suggests it has extreme elongation shouldn’t be considered so strange. But even if it does have > 6:1 elongation, even that is not so strange.
Read 5 tweets
22 Jan
Here's a concept I developed at NASA 18 years ago:

"Multipole Radiation Shielding."

Our director called it the First Generation Star Trek Shield. My lab lead had the idea to use electrostatics to protect spacecraft from cosmic radiation and he asked me to lead the effort. 1/n
2/ The problem with using electrostatics to shield a spacecraft is that space is filled with both positive and negative charged particles, so if you use a positive field you attract the negative particles, and vice versa. Then,...
3/...your "shield" actually speeds up those particles so they hit you faster and cause MORE problems.

For example, galactic cosmic radiation is positive nuclei. They were accelerated in the shockwaves of supernovae throughout the galaxy and they randomly enter our solar system.
Read 29 tweets
13 Jan
I’ve been thinking a lot lately about measures of complexity. Look at the complex structures in a star. Amazing! It is mind-blowing that such complexity naturally arises in the cosmos simply because a bunch of mass gravitated together and started fusion 🤯

And... (thread) /1
2/ that’s not all. The Sun has these self-organizing Bénard cells all over its surface. These are convection cells where the plasma is hotter and rising, surrounded by borders where it is colder and falling. Amazing! Put enough mass together, you get this🤯 (Source: NSO/AURA/NSF)
3/ Here’s a gif showing the convection that self-organizes into similar Bénard cells. This process just happens naturally in many situations in nature, including in stars 🤯 (Image credit: G. Kelemen, fyfluiddynamics.com/2017/10/lookin…)
Read 37 tweets
18 Dec 20
Rockets and Lasers! Results from NASA Flight Opportunities Program: successful flights of Ejecta STORM on the @mastenspace Xodiac rocket. This is a laser instrument that measures the properties of lunar dust. Read more: ucf.edu/news/ucf-devel… @UCF @NASAArmstrong @NASAfo
Working with @mastenspace, @Honeybee_Ltd, @NASAArmstrong on these tests was a great experience. @astroaddie and I have been developing this instrument with the UCF team over the past year. We delivered the instrument to the Mojave Air & Space Center last month.
Got the instrument installed onto the top of @mastenspace's Xodiac rocket. Honeybee Robotics flew their PlanetVac system on the same flight, enabling us to compare interactions in the simulated lunar soil. Installed several cameras. Set up and checked out the cameras.
Read 21 tweets
16 Dec 20
Was re-reading the Apollo flight crew debriefings and came upon this unusual phrase. Pete Conrad of Apollo 12 described how he landed the Lunar Module as "milking her down." This reminds me of the prevalence of strange jargon when I worked on the Space Shuttle... 1/n Image
2/ I can't remember many of the strange phrases any more. (Sigh) But I remember this one:
"We need to put that dawwwg to bed!"
And "milking the job" meant taking too long to finish a job because you are lazy and dragging out the task as a way to avoid more work.
3/ I don't know why "milking it" came to mean being lazy and dragging out a task. I remember the jargon was always evolving and taking on new meanings. Maybe milking cows was a slow task? Maybe it meant you were getting all the benefit out of a task, like getting milk? Anyhow...
Read 6 tweets
20 Nov 20
1/n. We were discussing this comic by @xkcd while examining simulated lunar regolith, today. It came from this great piece about research by physicist Dr. Karen Daniels on why SAND PHYSICS is so dang difficult. (THREAD) nytimes.com/2020/11/09/sci… Image
2/ Once long ago, I co-chaired a workshop called "NASA's Workshop on Granular Mechanics in Lunar & Martian Exploration." The other co-chairs included some of the world's leading experts in "sand physics". I casually told them, "Yeah, I think it will take 50 years to solve this."
3/ Bob Behringer (Duke University, a world-renowned expert in sand physics) laughed in my face and said, "MORE LIKE 200 YEARS!" That was 20 years ago. If I were correct that it would take 50 years, we should have solved 40% of sand physics by now. If Bob were right, then 10%.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!