Last night I watched "Mr. Jones" a recent film about Gareth Jones, a reporter who at great personal danger exposed the forced famine in Ukraine. Gripping movie, and now reading more about Jones' remarkable career.
I have a simple 3-part test for 1930s political and intellectual figures. Did they realize:
1. Hitler was bad 2. Stalin was bad 3. FDR was good?
Many people fail one or more of these. Jones passed all three easily.
You can read his work, which grasped the stakes on all three with remarkable clarity: garethjones.org
I'm also interested in reading more on Duranty, who as a villain is possible even more fascinating than Jones as a hero. I knew the outlines and want to delve deeper into his motivations. Eager for reading recommendations on Duranty's career.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've seen a lot of praise for this Kevin Williamson piece on Trump and the GOP. I obviously agree with the "Trump is bad" sentiment, which accounts for its popularity among Never Trumpers. However.... nationalreview.com/the-tuesday/th…
There are a couple massive flaws worth highlighting, because they're characteristic of the poisons that inhabit even many species of anti-Trump conservatism.
The first his Williamson's whitewashing of William F. Buckley's support for white supremacy:
1/ A few months ago, I had an online run-in with @EoinHiggins_, a left-wing writer. It has since taken a rather bizarre turn. Thread:
@EoinHiggins_ 2/ It began in August, when I wrote a column arguing that Trump’s authoritarianism is an outgrowth of a deeper trend within his party. It’s a theme I’ve been making over and over throughout the Trump era: nymag.com/intelligencer/…
[thread] One progressive tic that I'd like to see go away is "X constituency won the election." We’ve seen this in a lot of elections, most memorably (for me) the Jones special election in Alabama.
If the point is to give a gold star to people who voted for your candidate, then the gold stars go to… everybody who voted for your candidate. You don’t deserve less credit for voting Democratic simply because fewer members of your demographic also voted Democratic.
One of the problems with this habit is that it reduces people to their race, or sometimes race+gender. Most voters are cross-pressured by multiple factors: education, religion, geography, etc. Seeing voters as undifferentiated ethnic blocs is terrible politics.
A note on my coverage. My goal in writing about Trump has been to write about him like he was any other president. That standard is practically impossible to keep, because his offenses are at a scale and frequency so far beyond the historic norm.
The standard of "Would this story merit dropping everything and writing about immediately?" is one normal presidents meet every few weeks, or less. For Trump it's several times a day.
Yesterday @gregpmiller reported Trump making one of the most anti-Semitic comments any modern president has uttered. A normal pol would be facing calls to resign over this: nymag.com/intelligencer/…
The freest of freebies would be for Biden or (better still!) Harris to denounce Robin DiAngelo. That would get media attention. nytimes.com/2020/09/12/us/…
@EoinHiggins_ The entire point of my article is that the problem with the GOP is sysmetatically ideological and NOT an aberration! nymag.com/intelligencer/…
@EoinHiggins_ Writers do a bad job of understanding words all the time, but it's rare to see yourself represented as making the exact 100% opposite of your actual point.