"The best employee monitoring software can look to improve productivity, improve security, or both"
I love this guide on worker monitoring software because it describes employer interests and purpose creep in such a blunt way. H/T @JeremiasPrassl techradar.com/uk/best/best-e…
"Monday.com is mostly though of as a project management tool, but it's worth pointing out that if you are tracking tasks and ... which jobs are being done by whom then you effectively have a basic form of employee monitoring"
"Reasons to buy: Attractive interface"
"SentryPC is designed for a wide range of uses, from blocking access to websites to enhancing productivity and conducting investigations"
"Reasons to buy: Stealthy. Inexpensive"
"Reasons to avoid: Potential privacy issues"
"iMonitorSoft ... is aimed at helping organizations improve employee productivity and protect corporate confidential information"
"The platform can monitor a host of activities" (from doc metadata to apps used to searches to keystrokes)
"Reasons to buy: All-in-one solution"
"InterGuard provides software that aims to record, alert, block, and act on user activity, in order to protect business data, maintain productivity, and ensure legal compliance for data and security protection"
"Reasons to buy: Online demo and tours"
(...not very convincing :p)
"Work Examiner is broken down into three main purposes: web usage control, surveillance, and work time tracking"
"Reasons to buy: 30-day free trial"
(...come on, seems like the writers of the guide lost interest)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Nervig und sinnlos: Alle hassen Cookie-Banner", schreibt @suka_hiroaki und ja, es ist ein Desaster.
Hab mit ihm gesprochen. Entweder individualisiertes Tracking wird verboten oder Frage nach "Einwilligung" wird durch strenge Auslegung endlich unrentabel. derstandard.at/story/20001236…
Letzteres wurde 2018 versäumt. Damals wäre wohl der optimale Zeitpunkt gewesen, die "Einwilligung" in der DSGVO in einer Art auszulegen und durchzusetzen, die dazu geführt hätte, dass viele nicht eingewilligt hätten und es sich ökonomisch nicht mehr ausgezahlt hätte, zu fragen.
Hätte es 2018 überall in der EU gleich einige Verfahren gegen größere Website-Publisher gegeben, die Daten ohne adäquate Einwilligung verarbeiten und weitergeben, ähnlich wie jetzt die norwegische Datenschutzbehörde gegen Grindr, stünden wir ganz woanders.
The Norwegian data protection authority plans to fine the dating app Grindr €9.6 million for sharing personal data with advertising/data firms like MoPub, Xandr and OpenX without a GDPR legal basis, more than 10% of its assumed annual turnover of "at least" $100m.
Dass öffentliche Stellen - wie hier das Land Oberösterreich - es nicht mal auf so sensiblen Seiten wie der Anmeldung für die Impfung schaffen, ohne Datenübertragung an Google (samt zwangsweiser "Einwilligung") auszukommen, ist echt eine Bankrotterklärung. land-oberoesterreich.gv.at/files/covid19i…
Laut Datenschutzerklärung gehts um Google reCaptcha, ein Dienst, der das Anmeldeformular vor Bots und Manipulationen etc schützen soll: land-oberoesterreich.gv.at/files/covid19i…
reCaptcha ist aber sehr datenintensiv+intransparent. Es gibt Alternativen. Sollten die nicht reichen, brauchts welche.
Wenn ich die Seite aufrufe, wird alles mögliche an Google übertragen, einiges davon in Cookies gespeichert, inkl. "_ga" Cookie. Würde sagen, da ist einiges an personenbezogenen Daten dabei, das weit über die IP hinausgeht.
(die Formularinhalte werden nicht an Google übertragen)
"The PSD2 'Open Banking' regulation has forced banks to open up consumer data via APIs..."
...so that companies can now exploit yet another category of personal information - bank transaction data - for marketing surveillance (and credit assessment etc). rippll.com/index#open
I disagree. Practically, most people won't get "power over their banking data". In most cases, predatory data and fintech companies will get power over their banking data.
"Several large data brokers and adtech companies are still reselling data on millions from shady sources. They must urgently clean up their data supply chain, and they must be held responsible"
Amazon resold "granular location data from X-Mode, a controversial firm that collected at least some of its data without informed consent. X-Mode, whose customers include U.S. military contractors, obtained data from Muslim Pro…"
"Motherboard first contacted AWS ... at the start of January and did not receive a response. Some time later, the listings were removed ... It is not clear whether AWS itself removed them or whether X-Mode did ... Neither company responded to multiple requests for comment"
Regardless of the announced update, what kind of personal information does Whatsapp currently share with FB, according to its website?
- account+device info
- transaction data
- service-related information
- information on how you interact with others
Basically, all metadata.
Personal data Whatsapp shares with Facebook "may include other information identified in the Privacy Policy section entitled ‘Information We Collect’ or obtained upon notice to you or based on your consent"
According to the current privacy policy for non-EU users, Facebook may use Whatsapp (meta)data for all kinds of extensive digital profiling including for "product suggestions (for example, of friends or connections, or of interesting content) and showing relevant offers and ads".