Warning: a typical Pitcavagean thread begins here. Read on at your own peril.

Note the phrase below, "we want our statement to resonate with the sheeple." The word "sheeple" is commonly used by people in the far right to refer to the American people, who passively believe
whatever the government/New World Over/media/Jews/Deep State/Name Yer Enemy tell them. When I began researching right-wing extremism in 1994 it was already on everybody's lips. Was it always this way, though? When did this phrase emerge? (or, given its simple construction, how
many different times did it independently emerge?"). Some words you can look up the etymology of, but slang terms are more difficult. However, you don't have to be an expert in order to do Internet sleuthing using Google Books and specifying various time ranges. The results
are interesting (to me, at least), if you can put up with Google Book's awful interface and info delivery (like many Google services, Google Books is far less useful today than it used to be)..
Given how common it was in the early to mid 1990s, we can assume it was in use for some time before that. But what about when we look further back? It pops up far less often, and not always in the context of right-wing extremism, but more
often in a generic sense. I've compiled some examples and we can go through them in reverse chronological order. In addition to Google Books, I have also used my personal account at Newspapers.com. Just the usage graph for "sheeple" from this site alone is interesting.
This one is a little mysterious. However, some searching on Barbara Hutchinson and "tax law researcher" suggests that she was an activist in the right-wing tax protest movement in the 70s and 80s; thus this 1977 usage would be extremist.
Here is a 1970 white supremacist newsletter, Facts for Action (I actually subscribed to it in the 1990s), in which "sheeple" is clearly used in an extremist fashion. Google Books, per its usual nonfunctionality, no longer displays this language in snippet view for us to see.
Indeed, there are enough 1970s examples involving right-wing ideology that we can be confident it was in common usage in this sense at the time. Here's a 1979 letter to the editor in the Billings Gazette that not only has "sheeple" but as a bonus has "New World Order!"
Going further back in time, though, interestingly, examples of "sheeple" from the 1960s seem virtually non-existent. I guess the phrase was forgotten for a while. Here's a rare 60s example from the Louisville Courier Journal in 1962; note the reference is generic, not extremist.
In the 1950s, usages seem to be generic and unrelated to right-wing extremism, as in this 1951 essay originally appearing in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
In this 1950 advertising work, we see a sheeple reference that is generic in nature, contrasting "big shots" and "sheeple."
Here in this 1949 work, "The Old Hokum Bucket," we can see very clear usage of the word--but in a generic, non-ideological sense, as victims of demagogues and "shysters" of all types.
Before the late 40s, the references to "sheeple" that I find are not in the context of "sheep-like people" but tend to refer to actual sheep. So, basically, this cursory research would suggest that a few people began to use the word "sheeple" in a generic sense in the mid-20th
century, but it was probably in the 1970s that right-wing extremists--both white supremacists & anti-gov't extremists (who overlapped more in the 70s/80s than today)--picked up the term & began using it regularly. I did not know that before this evening. I find it interesting.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Pitcavage

Mark Pitcavage Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @egavactip

29 Jan
1. Secession efforts--which happen regularly--tend to bore me. But this one, promoted by Biedermann and the so-called Texas Nationalist Movement, is interesting (to

"Texas Lawmaker Kyle Biedermann Introduces Bill Aimed at Seceding from the Union"

thedailybeast.com/gay-hitler-tex…
2. me) largely because of the history of the latter. The TNM, headed by Daniel Miller, traces its history back to the 1990s and one of the factions of the Republic of Texas, an anti-government extremist sovereign citizen group that plagued the state at the time with sovereign
3. "paper terrorism" tactics and, in 1997, a kidnapping and armed standoff in west Texas at the (double-wide) "Embassy" for the group and its then-leader, Richard McLaren. In the 90s, Daniel Miller was "vice-president," then later "provisional president" of one of the Republic
Read 7 tweets
26 Jan
The U.S. has a deep history of right-wing violence, so much so that many shocking incidents are largely forgotten. One such incident, which occurred in Woodburn, Oregon, in 2008, involved a father and son pair of anti-government extremists, Bruce and Joshua Turnidge.
The elder Turnidge, Bruce, once tried to start a militia and later told people the OKC bombing had been a good thing. Financial difficulties and fear that Obama would institute gun control caused them to decide to build a bomb with which to rob a bank, theoretically solving their
cash problems and allowing them to buy guns as well. Their harebrained scheme involved planting a bomb outside a bank, then phoning in a warning to clear people out. Apparently they thought they would then be able to rob it. Police were called in, but could find no bomb in the
Read 6 tweets
27 Dec 20
This is a short, anecdotal thread about UFO-related "terrorism" in the United States. We tend to think of terrorism as being related to the far right, or the far left, or extremist religious movements, but fanatic belief in any cause can potentially result in violent acts.
By way of explanation, I was thinking about the Nashville bombing last night, which got me to thinking about other unusual bombings involving vehicles (as target or delivery vessel), one of which was related to a fringe religious group focused on UFOs.
The group in question is the Outer Dimensional Forces, which still exists and has been based in Weslaco in far south Texas since 1966. Its founder, Orville Gordon (who called himself Nodrog), built a UFO landing pad for ships that would land and save himself and his followers
Read 25 tweets
2 Nov 20
Please stop conflating different American contexts for the word "militia;" it just creates confusion for people.

"Stanford’s Greg Ablavsky on Law and the History of American Militias"
law.stanford.edu/2020/10/12/sta…
There are three main contexts involving armed groups in which the word "militia" is used.

1. The historical/legal/statutory militia, which is referred to as "the militia," not as "militias." I simplify, but today it is basically the National Guard.

2. "Militias" as a *generic*
term for any non-actual-military armed group, particularly ones with a paramilitary bent to them (such as foreign examples like Shi'ite militias or Druse militias).

3. Paramilitary groups within the militia movement, a specific right-wing anti-government extremist movement.
Read 4 tweets
24 Oct 20
The federal and state charges in the Michigan militia kidnapping plot are interesting; this is a thread about them. I should note I've tracked over 200 right-wing terrorist incidents in the U.S. (and many other r-w criminal incidents), which has given me some insight into how
common or rare certain charges or prosecutorial approaches are. I should note my background is in extremism, though--not the law.

The case is unusual in that it has "split" charges. Six of the defendants were charged federally, while the rest were charged by the state of
Michigan. In most cases, either the feds prosecute or the state prosecutes (often because the feds may not be interested in the case), but not both. There are also cases--typically involving high-profile extremist murders--where the feds and the state both prosecute the same
Read 16 tweets
10 Oct 20
Interested in a terminology thread? I knew you were!

Let's talk about (extremist or terrorist) cells vs. groups vs. movements!

These are all just words and whenever you try to apply one word to real human beings and situations that don't always fit into neat boxes, you can come
up with problems & need to have exceptions, but leaving that aside, these terms usefully describe certain concepts related to extremism and/or terrorism.

First, let's talk about a "cell," a term which is a little grandiose and may convey more sophistication than it usually has.
Essentially a cell is just a small informal group or grouping of two or more individuals working together for a specific purpose, such as a terrorist act. Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols (and, arguably, the Fortiers) constituted a cell. Cells can emerge organically, as several
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!