One of the big questions facing Congress right now is how bold the next recovery package needs to be.

From my conversations, it feels like there’s a simple disconnect here.

[thread]
For lots of professionals, the economic recovery has already occurred. Their office may have done some layoffs early on, but folks have largely been rehired and things are chugging along.

You see this in the numbers for North Carolina.
Our financial and business services sectors have basically completely recovered in terms of job loss.

And that’s great.
But check out our state’s numbers for manufacturing and hospitality.

For these folks, it’s still a brutal mess.
Across our state, we still have hundreds of thousands of families who are in serious financial peril - which also means we have at least that many children who are struggling right along with them.
In 2009, we forgot about that.

We let a rapid recovery among high-earners dampen our determination to help everyone else.
As a result, it was a long, slow, painful recovery for tens of millions of families.

Our decision to look the other way caused a lot of suffering - and it led to massive political consequences, many of which we are still dealing with today.
We can’t make the same mistake. We have to get this recovery right.

And for a lot of people that means seeing beyond their immediate spheres and getting a sense of how other people are doing.
We can always debate the specifics of what a recovery package should emphasize - but that debate should begin with a broad consensus that, as a nation, we have millions of families who are still in a deep hole and looking the other way should not be an option.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sen. Jeff Jackson

Sen. Jeff Jackson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JeffJacksonNC

26 Jan
Hey folks - I'm officially running to serve North Carolina in the U.S. Senate.

You deserve leadership that listens and learns. So we're making this a true 100 county campaign.

This is Day One. Your support now means a lot:
secure.actblue.com/donate/jeff-ja…
300k unemployed.

People losing their homes.

Students and teachers under incredible strain.

Parents who genuinely don’t know if they’ll come up short next month.

And clear racial disparities running through all of it.

I want to use this job to stand up for those people.
Our state has 10.5 million people, only two US Senators, and at least one of them should be in the habit of standing up for people.

We are 0 for 2 right now - and that has to change.
Read 6 tweets
13 Jan
These days, it’s not enough to simply be honest.

You have to make the case *for honesty.*

I think the way you do that is by pointing out that with dishonesty tends to come defeat and self-destruction.
In retrospect, we should have figured that the Information Age would be followed promptly by the Disinformation Age.
While we’re on the subject, here are four developments I think brought us into the Disinformation Age:

1) Self-reinforcing Facebook algorithm

2) Hyper-targeted digital advertising

3) Full-on partisan cable news

4) New level of shamelessness by politicians who know better
Read 5 tweets
12 Jan
Lots of cynicism on whether we can ever break through with folks who have been deeply misled about the election.

First, we have an obligation to try.

Second, even if it's 90% unsuccessful, it's still plainly worth it. That feels like brutal defeat, but it's not - it's a win.
Yesterday I took one approach by providing an avalanche of counter-evidence.

A simpler approach - from Carl Sagan - is to say, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."

Make sure they know they're making an extraordinary claim, and ask for extraordinary evidence.
And for as frustrated as you may feel, imagine that it slowly dawned on you that *you* were actually the one who was wrong about the election - and how painful that would be, and the lengths you would go to to avoid dealing with that.

Their brick wall would be yours, too.
Read 4 tweets
11 Jan
I keep hearing:

"But Jeff, are you SURE the election wasn't rigged? Because I heard it was."

Ok - if you honestly aren’t sure, I just put together a list of 44 sources - a number of them supporters of the president - for you to consider.

jeff-jackson.medium.com/was-the-electi… #ncpol
In my view, if you genuinely believe that the election may have been stolen, you owe it to yourself to at least check your beliefs against what you see below.
(And if, upon review, you determine that the evidence *does not* support a conclusion that the election was rigged, the next step would be to cast a skeptical eye toward the sources that repeatedly tried to convince you otherwise.)
Read 6 tweets
5 Jan
When I have constituents respond to my emails about vaccine distribution with angry notes about the virus being a joke and not worthy of their concern, I just think about the people who have worked so hard to mislead them.

And how many of them are in Congress.
Pretending a global pandemic isn't worthy of concern isn't a notion you arrive at on your own.

It takes a concerted effort by people who *fully understand* that they are being deceptive.

And lots of these folks are elected officials who should exist to *do the opposite thing.*
And if your elected official is planning on spending tomorrow objecting to the clear outcome of an election, then I'm talking about that guy, too.

Because this is a reality-detachment thing now.

I just don't understand the ethical willingness to knowingly mislead people.
Read 6 tweets
3 Jan
We lost far more Americans to Covid in December than we lost in the entire Vietnam War.

And as we start January, all of our state's Covid numbers are moving swiftly in the wrong direction.

The most troubling metric is our positive test percentage, which just hit a record. Image
This metric is important because it controls for the amount of tests we're giving.

So for the people who say, "Sure, there are more positive tests, but that's just because we're testing more people," we've got this metric to determine just how prevalent the virus is.
There was a brief moment in September where we fell below 5% and we were starting to feel better about things. Sec. Cohen said she really wanted us below 2%.

We never got there.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!