JAIL COVID UPDATE: The case numbers from the weekend are not yet available online but I understand that there is now an outbreak at Vanier Centre for Women, with 9 inmate cases. Meanwhile, Maplehurst has had 116 inmate cases (including 1 who works in the kitchen), 62 staff cases
According to a memo, the union is concerned about the Maplehurst cases being linked to continued audio/video court appearances. They want those to be stopped for 14 days, or at least stopped for inmates who are positive. (I can imagine the response to this).
Outbreak at the Central East Correctional Centre in Lindsay per the local public health unit today. Heard from a source that it's three or four people in a segregation unit.
LATEST JAIL COVID UPDATE: As of Jan 31, the most recent day available, there are 11 jails with inmates who have COVID. Maplehurst is at 106, Thunder Bay CC is at 45, Thunder Bay jail is at 22. Toronto South Detention Centre is at 30 (may be linked to the transfers from TB jail).
Elgin-Middlesex Detention Centre at 19, Vanier Centre for Women at 12, Ottawa at 5, Central North at 3, Central East at 2. One case each at Sarnia and Toronto East.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Crown's closing arguments begin today (they were supposed to start at 9:30 but we haven't yet). For the defence arguments yesterday, my thread is here:
Okay looks like we are close to starting. For a preview of where the Crown is likely going, here is what their key expert said: thestar.com/news/gta/2020/…
And here is my wrap on the four days of cross-examination by the Crown of the defence's key expert Dr. Alexander Westphal: thestar.com/news/gta/2020/…
Good morning. We are back for the final two days of Alek Minassian's trial for the first-degree murder of Ji Hun Kim, So He Chung, Anne Marie D’Amico, Andrea Bradden, Chul Min (Eddie) Kang, Renuka Amarasingha, Dorothy Sewell, Geraldine Brady, Munir Najjar, and Betty Forsyth.
Today we will be hearing closing arguments from the defence, led by Boris Bytensky. He will be arguing Minassian should be found not criminally responsible because his form of autism spectrum disorder rendered him unable to know what he did was morally wrong.
We heard on the last day of evidence that this argument comes down to what the defence is saying was a "split-second decision" on April 23 ,2018 by Minassian to make his long-planned mass killing a reality.
Back at what is looking like the tail end of evidence at Alek Minassian's trial for the Toronto van attack. The defence has a couple more questions for Dr. Scott Woodside then he'll be done cross.
Defence says Woodside didn't make recordings of his interviews with Minassian, but did anyone else?
Woodside says no.
Now back to talking about the notes vs the report. Did you only make one page of notes for the last five hours of your interview with Minassian?
Woodside says defence has misunderstood if that's what he thinks.
Woodside said Minassian did say he wanted to kill more women, though he knew it would be random.
Defence: He saw the group of people at Yonge and Finch and started the attack.
Woodside: He thought 20 kills would be high.
Defence: We don't know when he was thinking that
Woodside said it was part of his account of what he was thinking at the time. Doesn't think he prompted it with a question.
Defence: He was in the second lane from the right. When the light turned green he "floored it" and drove into the people.
Defence: That was a split second decision. The decision to start in that place was a split second.
Woodside agrees.
Defence: Unlike the main plan which he had days, weeks, year to think about, the decision to actually drive on the sidewalk was made "almost instantly."
Cross-examination of Dr. Scott Woodside, the Crown's forensic psychiatrist who doesn't think Alek Minassian is not criminally responsible, has begun. Starts with the defence asking about the process of the assessment.
Defence: It's a back and forth conversation?
Woodside: Within certain limits. He could answer as he chose, would ask follow up questions. Let him take the time to say what is important to him. There is structure and areas they need to cover but he has "fair bit of freedom"
Defence: You want build a rapport and get him to talk
Woodside: Within limits, needs to be clear I am not a friend or advocate. Clear from the start that what they tell me could be in the report to the judge.
Crown prosecutor John Rinaldi is continuing his examination-in-chief of Dr. Scott Woodside today. Here is where you can follow along with a summary of Woodside's from yesterday: thestar.com/content/thesta…
We start off today with the judge suggesting the lawyers can make oral arguments on the facts and written submissions on the law (one way to save time). The trial was set to end on Dec. 18 but it's looking like we may go into the week of the 21st which creates staffing issues
She wants to hear oral arguments on the facts while the evidence is fresh in her mind which is why she doesn't want to put them off till later, but submissions on the law can come later.