"Overcoming the flesh: the transgender movement wants to legally abolish physical sex. Risks and side effects are kept silent" | Big-hit 1400-word report in Germany's influential centre-right newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine @faznet#GenderClinics 1/ zeitung.faz.net/faz/feuilleton…
"(The @FDP party & Greens) have presented drafts for a (gender) self-determination law that for long stretches seem as if they were written by the activists themselves. At age 14, everyone should be able to decide each year whether they are legally to be considered man or woman."
Germany is the latest country to launch a dissident LGB group in protest & alarm at what they see as the capture of establishment LGBT organisations by the radical project to topple biological sex & erect self-declared "gender identity" in its place.
"There are now 15 LGB groups worldwide & 3 more forming," says Bev Jackson of the original @ALLIANCELGB. One driver is fear of backlash when people are alerted to the destabilising social changes pushed by Queer Theory-captured, govt-backed LGBT lobbies.
The @faznet article by Thomas Thiel portrays an activist report involving law firm Dentons & Queer lobby @IGLYO as an international template for the self-ID gender change project. Thiel characterises the ambition this way: "Gender transition should become a simple speech act".
Thiel: "Where (gender change involves) surgical and hormonal interventions, medical & legal hurdles are to be removed ... Minors should be able to change sex as early & spontaneously as possible -- without a medical report, an adjustment period (or) parental consent."
"... the concept of ‘gender identity’ (is) central to both (German draft laws), according to which gender assignment is solely a matter of feeling & gender can be completely changed through language."
"On the other hand, however, injunctions are made for surgical and hormonal treatments. The body comes back in through the back door - which has to be concealed as much as possible. The IGLYO paper openly states the goal of 'demedicalizing' the campaign ...
"Sex reassignment procedures are not to appear as painful & risky interventions followed by more surgery & lifelong hormone treatment, but as wish-fulfilment without physical & psychological consequences. Brochures distributed in schools prime children to switch gender ...
"Since 2013, the number of young people who feel they are in the wrong body or want to have their bodies medically changed has increased more than fivefold. Girls are particularly affected ...
" 'The expert observes (with dismay) the growing number of physically healthy adolescent girls, with age-role conflicts typical of puberty or body image disorders, who have not only their breasts amputated but also their uterus & ovaries removed at the age of 14, 15, 16'."
That comment is from child & adolescent psychiatrist Alexander Korte of Ludwig Maximilian University in Munich, who is troubled by the sudden appearance of teenage-onset gender dysphoria, a global trend chiefly affecting natal girls with a host of problems & difficulties.
In an April 2019 interview Dr Korte crystallised concerns about informed consent & misrepresentation of puberty blockers as a no-regrets option -- concerns amplified in 2020 by the English High Court ruling against the Tavistock GIDS clinic.
Dr Korte says these drugs suppressing natural hormones deny children "experiences necessary for the formation of their identity, including socio-sexual formation, i.e. relationships. These are necessary experiences also for a homosexual 'coming out'." gdworkinggroup.org/2019/11/15/int…
In February 2020 Dr Korte was a voice for caution at a public meeting in Berlin called by the German Ethics Council. His presentation (in German) -- ethikrat.org/fileadmin/PDF-…
The council issued a statement blending "gender-affirming" orthodoxy with admissions of risk & uncertainty. It cites the ethical challenge "to support minors on their way to their own gender identity &, at the same time, to protect them from – at times irreversible – harm".
"It is an aggravating factor that some decisions have to be made when the child’s abilities of reasoning & judgment are not yet fully developed. The reasons for the marked increase in the number ... seeking treatment & counselling, of whom a high proportion are female ...
"... are controversial & urgently require further clarification ... the long-term effects of medical treatments need to be further investigated ... "
Group concerned about treatment based on low-quality evidence -- segm.org
Meanwhile, the rise of groups such as @LGBAlliance_DE, insisting on *same-sex* attraction, is awkward for LGBTQ lobbies whose power & funding rest on the image of a progressive "rainbow community" all for the self-identified trans project & medicalised gender change for children.
"LGBTQ+ groups loathe & defame us because we disprove their narrative," says Bev Jackson. "We show it isn’t 'homophobic' to reject gender identity ideology & self-ID. In fact, many of us think the LGBTQ+ movement has itself become homophobic." lgballiance.org.uk/myths/
Clinics following the medicalised "gender-affirming" model claim these hormonal drugs & surgeries save lives by improving the mental welfare of minors distressed by conflict between biological sex & inner gender identity.
"(Victoria's anti-conversion therapy bill), which could mean up to a decade in jail or fines of almost $10,000 for anyone found trying to suppress or change another person’s sexuality or gender identity, passed by 27-9 votes late on Thursday." 1/ theaustralian.com.au/nation/politic…
Not a surprise, given the numbers. More significant, I think, was hearing several Australian MPs literate in the Tavistock court ruling, risks to minors in "affirmative" gender clinics, questions of consent to gender transition, & the emergence of regretful "detransitioners".
In the debate, some MPs, notably Liberal Democrat David Limbrick, tried to tease out the logic & possible consequences of this use of coercive state power. What does it mean to "change or suppress" sexuality or gender identity? He worried aloud about real-world scenarios.
"Doctors and psychiatrists want the Andrews government (in the Australian state of Victoria) to make changes to its plan to ban gay conversion therapy, due to concerns it will discourage some practitioners from treating vulnerable patients." theage.com.au/politics/victo…
This is significant criticism from the main medical body @amavictoria & college of psychiatry @RANZCP, which calls out the conflation of sexual orientation & gender identity that is the hallmark of activist-driven "conversion therapy" bans globally.
This concern raised by the college's Victorian branch is also interesting because the RANZCP's own policy arguably involves a more general, Queer Theory-style conflation of sexual orientation & gender identity. ranzcp.org/news-policy/po…
Two courts on the opposite side of the world recently made decisions on children & puberty blocker drugs which stop natural development. In the English case, the High Court said it was "highly unlikely" that a child 13 or under could consent to this "experimental" treatment. 1/
In Australia, the court decided it was in the "best interests" of a 12 year-old to begin puberty blockers to prevent "life-long damaging masculinisation". Born a boy, the child identifies as female.
Both rulings came down in December 2020 but a key difference is that the English court was considering whether children could give informed consent to their own treatment, while the Australian judge allowed doctors to proceed with the mother consenting on behalf of the child.
In Australia, public media outlet @abcnews has showcased children's hospital gender medicine for years. This treatment was found to be "experimental" in Keira Bell's court challenge to the UK Tavistock clinic. The ruling has global significance, but not on the ABC website.
Even before the Tavistock ruling, the UK had adopted a more cautious approach to this medicalisation. Finland & Sweden have edged away from the "gender affirming" medical model used in Oz. The pioneering Dutch clinic has expressed concern about a shift in patient profile.
But Australian readers were told back in April this was just a rightwing culture war, and that the gender medical model had prevailed. Now this Melbourne newspaper has had a "struggle session" with staff angry it ran the story of a worried (& obviously not bigoted) parent.
An American appeals court has ruled that "conversion therapy" bans offend the First Amendment right to free speech in the constitution. Here's a news report with the basic facts -- and significant omissions. This case looks important. THREAD
The two therapists who challenged the "conversion therapy" bans say they offer counselling: just talking. The Florida authorities lawmakers argue this does serious psychological harm to minors.
But these restrictive "ordinances" give a green light to one form of counselling. This "carveout" is a hallmark of the new-wave "LGBT conversion therapy" bans being pushed by "gender identity" activists around the world.
Canada's Bill C-6 would criminalise "conversion therapy". This is part of an international project pitched as an urgent rescue of "LGBTQ people" from right-wing religious bigots bent on forcibly changing their identity. cbc.ca/news/canada/br…
If people in the mainstream hear about this new wave of bans on "gay conversion therapy", their reaction is revulsion, then puzzlement: "Surely all that horrible electric shock stuff is a thing of the past? Nobody's even arguing about gay marriage any more."
What's new -- the heart of the controversy about these laws -- is "gender identity", not sexual orientation. It ties in to the global debate about the exponential surge in teenagers seeking to transition with hormonal drugs & surgery to an "inner gender" at odds with biology.