Look, no matter what Starship told us all back in the 80s, you can't actually build a city on rock and roll. Fortunately #AdamSmith is here to help. (with Hume in the background on synthesizer, we suspect.)
The first inhabitants of cities were traders and craftsmen who were particularly put upon before cities developed. You can tell by the kinds of things they consider privileges (deciding who their kids marry! deciding who inherits! 🤯) (III.iii.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Because they were probably itinerant peddlers and workers before they settled in cities, they were taxed for passing through lands, or crossing bridges, or setting up a stall to sell goods. Or whatever else someone could dream up. (III.iii.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Some traders got exceptions from those taxes from their local lords and that seems to have been enough to inspire the beginnings of towns. Who knew it was that easy? (III.iii.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Once you had the beginnings of a town, you had the beginnings of individual freedom—particularly from the King’s tax collectors. (III.iii.3) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
While the earliest freedoms began as personal privileges, they soon extended to all occupants of the town. That’s huge. And it’s where we get the phrase “Free Trade” which meant the ability to trade without additional taxation. (III.iii.4–5) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Town dwellers secured other important freedoms—the right to a town government, to build a wall for defense, to set a watch...these "privileges" made them more independent than serfs who worked the land. (III.iii.6) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
It’s really surprising, says Smith, that kings would just give away this kind of power! Veryout of character for kings. But remember how hard it was to rule stuff back then and how annoying the ruled people can be if you're the king. (III.iii.8) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Giving the townspeople liberty also made them more loyal to the king. So the worst kings (and Smith is NOT shy about naming names, folks) gave the most liberty. (III.iii.9) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
[We are no longer surprised, Dr. Smith, at your knowing so few good kings. We rather wonder now at your knowing any.] #JaneAusten (III.iii.9) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Because cities were safer and freer and investments were protected, people improved them with conveniences and luxuries. Like Starbucks. (III.iii.12) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Smith gives a shout out to order, good government, and security (peace). Once again, Canadian SmithTweeters say this is The Stuff. And Dr. Smith agrees. (III.iii.12) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Look at how subversive the laws protecting inhabitants of the towns were to the lordly powers: if someone "could conceal himself [in a town] from the pursuit of his lord for a year, he was free for ever." (III.iii.12) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
And because cities are on navigable waterways (Well, they were. Smith didn’t know about Indianapolis. It hadn’t been invented yet.) they could bring those luxuries in from places much farther away than just the surrounding towns. (III.iii.13) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
[Smith would have loved him some railroads. And container ships. And air freight. Can you imagine? I mean, when he’s talking about the cost of carriage, there are sometimes actual carriages involved!] (III.iii.13) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
As markets for fancy foreign goods develop in cities, local manufacturers see an opportunity to make their own goods to compete with imports. That’s where #hipsters come from! (III.iii.17–18) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
All that production, even if you do end up with hipsters, produces wealth for town and country. It works out just like Smith said in ch. 1. (It's why this part of the book feels a touch repetitive. But we don’t mind, because he’s right.) (III.iii.20) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Good morning, Smithketeers! Time for Fun With 18thC Spelling! WHY does #AdamSmith, who invented modern economics, spell it with an O like some kind of crazy person? #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
It's because he's thinking about the Greek roots of the word. Oikos=Household and Nomia=Management [Sending some love to our friends @kefimgr] #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
We, the SmithTweeters, support a revival of this spelling. We're sure it won't bother any of our oeconomist friends, or their oeconomics departments. Right? #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
He does use the phrase "free traders" and "a free trade" with the first phrase appearing extensively in Book 3, Chapter 3, where he points out that sometimes kings would give certain traders tax exemptions. They were then called "free traders." adamsmithworks.org/texts/chapter-…
OK so chapter 4 of Book 3 of #WealthOfNations is a lot of *chef's kiss* and a little "...wat." Let's dive in. (III.iv.) #SmithTweets
Towns getting rich helped the country get rich in three ways:
1) They provide a market for the country. 2) They provided entrepreneurial people with the money to buy and improve land. 3) They largely ended domination and war.
3) is another wildly underappreciated argument from Smith: The commercial society that towns fostered improved governing institutions to reduce violence and increase security so that development can even happen.
Is it just us, or do you guys love it when #AdamSmith is all, “I am inventing modern economics! To do so, I must now discuss at length that time the Germans and Scythians overran the Roman Empire!” Because we are very much here for that. (III.ii.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
It’s probably just us. Anyway the Germans and Scythians overran the Roman Empire.
Lots of land was deserted as people fled, then grabbed up or “engrossed” by a few people, who protected their grabbed land with primogeniture and entail. (III.ii.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Oh man, we love this chapter. And we love it because when Smith talks about how intimately the wealth of the town and the country are intertwined, it’s such a great example of how trade is about cooperation. (III.i.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Is there a better way to start the day than with a good ol' Smithian subdivision? OBVIOUSLY NOT. Capital can be employed in four ways: 1) procuring rude produce (raw materials) 2) manufacturing 3) wholesale 4) retail
(II.v.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
All four employments depend on each other. You can't have retail without raw materials, manufacturing, wholesaling. You won't procure raw materials with no one to sell them to. &c. (II.v.3–7) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Retail needs to be defended more than the other three categories. Smith is arguing against political writers who think that the number of retailers needs to be controlled to protect consumers and the public interest. (II.v.7) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets