(Respectfully... I fully understand why it makes sense to them.)
Consider that the Catholic Church's various entities operate as non-profit organizations under 501(c)(3) of the IRS tax code.
To tax the Church, you'd remove that exemption.
Here's the thing... the Catholic Church is a SMALL part of the non-profits in the US.
Quick facts: (2016)
- There are 1.54 million+ non-profits in the US
- These non-profits generate $1T+/yr (5.6% GPD) to the economy
- 501(c)(3) contribute HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS in services/yr
Claim:
* PA illegally counted Biden ballots three days after the Election
Truth:
B/C of issues with USPS service (crippled by the Trump-appointed head of USPS), the PA Supreme Court allowed ballots for ALL candidates to be counted up to 3 days later. pacourts.us/assets/opinion…
Claim:
* Col. Phil Waldron clamed 26% of votes were flipped from Trump to Biden during a "Test Run" of sequestered machines
* There were no sequestered machines, & therefore no "test run." The original poster later attributed the rumor to a "friend of a friend" of the source.
You could look at the past week & reasonably think MAGA/Q folk MUST know it's over.
But the thing about conspiracy theories is that they never end: they morph into new theories while maintaining that they've ALWAYS been right.
For MAGA/Q, it's "the plan" - Let me explain.
Right now the narrative running through the darker parts of the Internet involves "The Storm."
The Storm is a conspiracy theory that ALL of this - the election loss, the rhetoric, the insurrection, the 2nd impeachment - are part of Trump's master plan to root out the Deep State.
You see, in Trump's infinite wisdom he realized he could never MAGA as long as there were traitors in his own party.
So he came up with The Storm as a way to know who was truly a believer in MAGA, and who was a RINO.
This has all been an elaborate trap to catch those traitors.
Not too long ago I was part of an exercise to determine how difficult it would be to identify people involved in protests w/just the metadata (including location) from the cellular network.
We had a semi-simulated data set that used real info w/swapped IDs
... It was CRAZY easy
Once we sorted the data, we could track movement patterns of the devices & see which devices were communicating & moving w/each other.
In our data set, the vast majority of devices were burners or otherwise obfuscated, but we quickly figured out which devices were daily drivers.
As it turns out, that's enough.
If you find the daily drivers (and that becomes STUPID easy if you have access to more metadata) then you have a real-ID reference point.
From there, you can spot all the devices that are moving or communicating w/the real-ID.
There is a question I get asked quite a lot, & I'd like to address it.
There are many variations of the question - sometimes asked seriously, sometimes out of mockery - but the gist is always:
"If you're a priest, why don't you ACT like a priest?"
It's a good question.
Thing is... they're not REALLY asking,
"why don't you ACT like a priest?"
They're asking,
"why aren't you acting in the way I EXPECT a priest to act?"
... that expectation can be born from experience w/priests, or from preconceived notions of what the priesthood represents.
I know the "traditional" roles of a priest: pastor, confessor, counselor, administrator, etc. -- and those ALL important parts of the ministry of the Church.
However... if ALL priests ONLY did those things, our ministry wouldn't just be stunted... it would die on the vine.