So, I'm reading this military history book, and no, I won't tell you the name of it or the author because that wouldn't be polite, but as I'm reading I realize...this person's just drawn from like 3-4 primary sources and everything else is secondary. The endnotes are mainly ibid
Me being a nerd, I actually use footnotes and endnotes. There's sometimes hidden gems in there, including notes from the author that crack you up. But not here. So I keep reading, and keep coming across error after error, mostly contextual bc they haven't studied primary sources
I flip to the back and see this person has multiple books and refers to themself as a historian. About that.
See, being a historian isn't going "hey, I found this old stuff, it tells the full story, now buy my book! "
Being a historian is going, "hey, I found this old stuff, which I've compared to other old stuff that we've found, and compared/contrasted all this stuff to form a basic understanding of what we think this old stuff was, fully aware that we might not have all the stuff"
It's about looking at context and forming the best understanding that one can have, to say, "this is probably what happened" while also being open to new evidence that could be found, or new interpretations. Slapping together secondary sources and a few quotes ain't it
Anyways, I'm ticked off. Mainly because it was a great topic that deserved better. And the writing deserved better research. But if your foundation is flawed, the building is going to be askew. Thus endeth the rant
I'm gonna go read some more primary sources as a palate cleanser
Also, to be clear: I don't care what you call yourself, a historian or not - it's the sin of ommission here that is the issue. I don't think you need to be degreed to be a historian or even in the field to write good historical works.
You absolutely have to have a hunger for answers, for finding as many disparate sources as possible. And you should want to! There's a weird high you get when you're on the trail of new primary sources. It's one of the great joys in life. Don't deprive yourself of it
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ok, this all starts, as most stories do, with a baby being born to some people who were from some part of the British Empire because holy shit did those people like to colonize. John Stark was born in Londonderry, NH in 1828 to parents from Londonderry, Ireland, bc of course
You might be wondering what a New Hampshire is. Well, it aint old hampshire, that's for sure. It's like, almost Canada, but not. It's sorta like Vermont but more granite-y and flintier or something. There's lots of snow and taciturnity. And primaries. And Manchester is gross
Damn, Phillip Schuyler was the MASTER at politely but completely undercutting people
Namely, Ira Allen, Ethan's brother, who was trying to set Vermont up as its own thing
Philip Schuyler, who you might know as the father of these ladies
A complicated figure because of his slave ownership, Philip Schuyler also bears responsibility with Benedict Arnold for saving the American cause for independence in the Northern Department from 1775-1777. His logistics talents were unrivalled.
In 1871, William Holden, the Republican governor of North Carolina, became the first state governor to be impeached
The articles of impeachment claimed he used the militia to oppress the people, to quell what they said was a non-existent insurrection
The insurrection? The KKK
Holden, with backing from President Grant and the U.S. Army, had gone to war with the KKK in NC, which had used violence and intimidation to seized control of 2 counties, lynching a black US Army veteran and assassinating a white Republican state senator.
Holden declared the counties in insurrection & called up the militia. The militia and Federal troops went to work, rounding up Klansmen and driving the KKK underground. But the Klan still used night riders to intimidate the black community. 1870 was an election year.
My brain is utterly overturned at today's events. But something keeps running thru my head. In 1880, Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain faced down an angry mob intent on storming the Maine State House bc they believed the gubernatorial election was rigged
Unarmed. By himself.
The state was at risk of breaking out into civil war. The incumbent wouldn't leave. Armed mobs were assembling. The 52yo major general, still suffering from his Petersburg wound, arrived around this date in 1880 - his goal was to keep the peace until the state supreme ct cld rule
The state's political leaders asked him to call up the militia, which he could as it's commanding general. His response: "Whoever first says ‘take arms!’ has a fearful responsibility on him, & I don’t mean it shall be me who does that"