If you're teaching college during the pandemic, it's really important to remember that some of your students may be in this situation, and that it's your job to lighten their load. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
And being there for students with childcare issues doesn't just mean responding well when they bring them up, because they may not trust you enough to bring them up. It means saying—and showing!—that you can be trusted to work with them from Day One.
It means telling them it's okay to leave their video cameras off. It means telling them they won't be penalized if they have to dip out of class. It means making class audio available. It means making it clear that you're not going to be upset if you hear a kid in the background.
It means setting up schedules and deadlines and assignments and tests so that they don't have to ask for accommodations if life gets in the way—so that flexibility in response to unexpected crises is built in for all students automatically.
It means (if you have the ability to do so without undermining yourself or putting yourself in jeopardy) speaking out about the ways in which our current situation is challenging for YOU, to let students know this isn't just a one way street.
It took me a ridiculously long time to have this insight, but: MAYBE PUT THE FACT THAT WE'RE LIVING THROUGH A GLOBAL PANDEMIC IN YOUR SYLLABUS as context for discussing how you're going to be handling online ed?
And if you're a guy, be as explicit and emphatic as you can when mentioning childcare issues as something you're sensitive to. Because you can't assume that your students will assume that you understand that.
From my spring syllabus: "I know that some of you probably haven’t taken online classes before, and that others may have had bad experiences with the switch to online education last year. There’s no question that this is challenging and difficult. …
"But I want to let you know at the outset of our semester that I am committed to getting us through it together—to making our classes enjoyable and educational, to bringing everyone along, and to making sure that everyone gets the best grade possible. …
"That’s going to involve some compromises and some creativity on my part, but it’s my job to get you through this, and I take that responsibility seriously."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We are witnessing the "I supported Dr. King" rewriting of history in real time.
BTW, I'm not arguing that Brooks is entirely wrong about opening schools here. (You can tell, because if I were making that argument, I'd be making it.) There ARE real costs to keeping schools closed—as many educators, parents, and advocates for kids have noted.
Specifically, it would raise the minimum wage to $9.50 on the day of passage, then by $1.50 one year later, increasing by $1.50 each year until it reached $15 in 2025.
One other detail that the NBC screenshots leave out: After 2025, this bill would index the minimum wage to median wages, raising it automatically every year.
This all makes a lot of sense. My only question is whether the Dems currently have 50 votes for doing what @joshtpm urges them to do here, and if not, whether grinding along the way they're currently going for a little longer is likely to get them to 50.
You've got to make a deal with McConnell, or you've got to get Manchin on board, or you've got to find somebody on the other side of the aisle to get you to 50 without Manchin. (My read of the current situation is that Manchin isn't yet ready to jump).
And as Josh notes, the "jump" Manchin (and Sinema) would need to make here isn't an "axe the filibuster" jump. It's just a "tell McConnell to pound sand on the rules vote" jump.
Yep. And the more gerrymandered and otherwise rigged the system is, the more they'll sway to the most motivated, loudest voters on ON THEIR SIDE OF THE AISLE.
Most Republicans don't have to win a majority to stay in power, and they don't even have to win a majority of Republicans. They just have to pander to the most aggressive slice of the party.
What that slice looks like right now is a reflection of how badly broken our country and our political system is, but it also provides people working in electoral politics with an opening, because it ties the hands of the national GOP, opening up new avenues for the Dems.
Yeah, there's quite a bit of disinformation being pushed about the gender identity discrimination executive order the Biden admin issued yesterday. It's far less dramatic than its opponents are claiming.
In a nutshell, the EO says that the Biden administration intends to act against sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in a manner consistent with the Supreme Court's Bostock ruling, and instructs federal agencies to develop plans to do so. whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
What that means specifically for, say, school and college sports teams remains to be seen, since the admin just directed agencies to develop such policies, rather than dictating the particulars of what they should be.
So in Yo-Yo Ma's medley, the second bit was Amazing Grace, and I think the fourth was maybe a snippet of Simple Gifts. The first was the Star Trek theme, right? The third I have no idea. Anybody?