#ECB Sabine Lautenschläger giving a powerful account of the central banker view of the world #nextgencentralbanking but also claiming that PEPP is not monetary financing. She makes two arguments, which you will not be surprised I both find unconvincing! 👇
The first argument is that there is market discipline because member states need to pay interest rates on debt that the ECB buys and need to have sufficient ratings. However, interest is mostly paid back to MS as NCB dividend and Greece is included despite rating requirement.
Her second argument is that the objective is not to fund governments but rather price stability. However, (1) there is no contradiction: the objective of facilitating government spending is now itself a means to achieving price stability also (2) who knows!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is BS of course "Mr Weidmann said such a move would contradict the principle of market neutrality that is enshrined in EU law." ft.com/content/60d983…@OlafStorbeck@MAmdorsky /1
The term “market neutrality” is not from the Treaty but rather a very recent addition to ECB vocabulary. In fact, in a 2008 paper ECB officials explicitly deny that its operations are “market neutral”. ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops…
/2
The @ecb mandate contains two passages that might mistakenly be taken to imply the Weidman's radical neoliberal notion of neutrality. One is a uniquely vague passages about acting “in accordance with the principle of an open market economy” (TFEU 119) /3