Share this page!

Nicholas Grossman Profile picture
Twitter logo
5 Feb, 4 tweets, 1 min read
Trump incited the Jan 6. insurrection with months of lies, not just 1 speech. And he told followers to come to DC that day.
As Liz Cheney put it, he "summoned this mob, assembled the mob, and lit the flame of this attack... None of this would have happened without the President."
The Capitol attack had preplanned and spontaneous elements.
But both were incited by Trump. Both were in DC to help Trump hold on to power. The planners decided it was worth the risk and the protestors-turned rioters decided to attend because of the lie-based movement Trump built
A POTUS doing his duty would’ve told the truth, conceded, and supported the peaceful transfer of power, at least after losing in court and the Electoral College.
All previous modern presidents did that. No insurrection.
Trump didn’t. Culminated in violent insurrection.
His fault.
Trump’s role in causing the insurrection is so obvious—it doesn’t happen without his effort to overturn the election—that I find it hard to take alternative claims seriously.
There’s loyalists defending him no matter what and contrarians contrarianing. Otherwise, it’s just denial

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Nicholas Grossman

Nicholas Grossman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NGrossman81

Nicholas Grossman Profile picture
7 Feb
As someone whose main contribution to discussions of PC, cancel culture, etc. is criticizing catastrophizing, I’d like to say that a large group of NYT staffers declaring, in writing, that intent is irrelevant when evaluating speech is something worthy of philosophical pushback.
Intent isn’t the only relevant factor when evaluating speech. But it’s a factor.
Saying something isn’t the same as recounting what someone else said, esp not if the intent of recounting it is criticism.
Doesn’t mean you can’t criticize the recounting, just that it’s not the same
Consider “where are you from?” Identified as a microaggression in the US when the implication is “not America, so where really?”
But it’s also small talk, intending to get an answer like “Cleveland,” setting up chitchat about the Cavs or the rock and roll hall of fame or whatever
Read 5 tweets
Nicholas Grossman Profile picture
7 Feb
Did some Capitol attackers believe they were doing it at Trump's instruction?
Yes. There's hard evidence.

Even if we assume Trump didn't want them to think that, is it reasonable to say he couldn't have known they would?
No, not at all.

So he bears at least some responsibility.
Why'd they attack the Capitol?
To disrupt electoral vote certification.

Why did they want to do that?
Trump's lies about the 2020 election.

Why were they in DC?
Trump told them to come. Said it'd be "wild."

Would the attack have happened without Trump doing these things?
No.
Let's be incredibly generous to Trump and assume:
-he just says stuff and thinks none of his voters actually believe him
-he really wanted a peaceful demonstration
-he didn't act to stop the attack for hours because he was confused
Then he's still responsible via gross negligence
Read 4 tweets
Nicholas Grossman Profile picture
7 Feb
I don't know how much Dems think QAnon is driven by poverty and lack of education, but to the extent they do, they're wrong.
In some ways, educated people are more susceptible, misapplying skepticism and critical thinking, almost like an autoimmune disease
newrepublic.com/article/161266…
-Cults can attract well educated people, who have an especially hard time getting out since it requires admitting to themselves they were wrong and not savvy enough to see through it.
-Terrorists are rarely impoverished. If you are, you worry about day-to-day, like getting food.
Many participants/supporters of the Capitol attack have money/education:
-Who can travel to DC in the middle of a work week?
-For militias and military cosplayers, gear is expensive
-You need some understanding (even if misguided) to pick Jan. 6 and denounce current officeholders
Read 4 tweets
Nicholas Grossman Profile picture
6 Feb
Would Trump have beaten Biden if not for impeachment?
Who knows. But otherwise, I agree that impeachment exposed Trump's Ukraine scheme, which led the media and public to be more skeptical when Team Trump dropped their "October surprise" about Hunter Biden, undermining the hit.
I argued in Feb 2020 impeachment was worth it even though the Senate didn't convict.
Reason 2: Revealed the Truth
"Impeachment exposed the months-long effort... got details of the Ukraine scheme on the record and undermined Trump’s effort to lie about it."
arcdigital.media/4-reasons-impe…
And in October 2020, I wrote that smearing Hunter Biden was Team Trump's big play and totally flopped. One big reason was the exposure from impeachment. Another was that Trump became a victim of his own success warping the media environment around scandals
arcdigital.media/smearing-hunte…
Read 5 tweets
Nicholas Grossman Profile picture
5 Feb
I wrote in @ArcDigi on AOC's video about her experience of the Capitol attack, this powerful new form of communication, and why her critics are reacting so strongly to it.
They've fixated on how much she was really in danger, which mostly misses the point.
arcdigital.media/aoc-made-the-c…
A reader compared AOC's account to a New Yorker talking about 9/11 as personally traumatic even though they weren't at the World Trade Center.
He meant it as a criticism, but I think the analogy does the opposite. Big violent events have widespread impact.
arcdigital.media/aoc-made-the-c…
It turns out that my dad worked about a block and half from the World Trade Center. When he says he was there on September 11th, and tells his story of the day, of chaos, fear, and not knowing what to do, no one thinks it's wrong to say this, even though he wasn't in the towers.
Read 6 tweets
Nicholas Grossman Profile picture
22 Jan
No Republican goal during the Trump presidency was stopped by the legislative filibuster. Nothing had 51 votes but not 60 that couldn't be done by reconciliation.
When Dems filibustered Gorsuch, they scrapped it.
Whether you support or oppose the filibuster, those are the facts.
And let me preempt any "but Harry Reid" responses, because it actually shows the opposite lesson.
As I explained here, Democrats scrapping the filibuster for lower court nominees was the most unironically Both Sides fight of the 21st century.
Therefore...
arcdigital.media/against-the-ju…
Republicans telling themselves that the end of the lower court filibuster was unprovoked aggression that justified subsequent, substantially more egregious norm scrapping shows that they'd ditch the filibuster if needed and find a way to blame Democrats no matter what Dems do now
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @NGrossman81 has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @NGrossman81!

Read all threads by @NGrossman81