1/9 "Trust" of course is talked of everywhere. In #IDPolicyForum, a speaker bounced around from cryptographic trust, hardware roots of trust, and an anecdote about trusting the conference organiser because they were introduced by a mutual friend.
2/9 The trouble with this discourse and widespread use of the label is that it over-states what cryptographic "trust" is all about. It inflates lay peoples’ expectations of what #digitalidentity technology delivers.
3/9 The so-called "trust Anchors" or "Roots of Trust" DO NOT ENABLE ANYONE TO TRUST ANYONE ELSE in the regular sense of the word (pardon my shouting).
4/9 Cryptographic "trust" is a cut-and-dried verification that a given digital signature chains back to a reliable master key, and that the assertions bound to signatures along the chain can be reliably attributed to issuers. It's very dry.
5/9 So a chain of cryptographic verifications can mean that the digital signature on a prescription can be taken to be that of a board-certified physician, and in turn, the board could be taken to be an accredited professional body (depending on how the #PKI is set up).
6/9 None of that means the pharmacist filling a prescription "trusts" the doctor. That is immaterial. It is not the job of the pharmacist to trust the doctor, or know the doctor in any way, but instead to check the legitimacy of forms and check some things about the patient.
#PKI certificate chains aren’t about trust; they’re much better than that!
8/9 So I wish we wouldn’t use the label in initiatives like “Trust Frameworks” or “Trust over IP”. Some say the language is to ‘communicate’ to non-technical users, but let's take more care using emotions as metaphors for highly technical properties. #TDIF#PCTF#IDPolicyForum
'What should Biden do in #DigitalIdentity?' panel, @RossNodurft carefully draws a distinction between [the prospect of a] "National ID" versus a "national approach to digital identity". Hear hear!! #IDPolicyForum
In Australia, any mention of national approaches to digital identity as national infrastructure sadly gets bogged down in the spectre of a dreaded National ID. #IDPolicyForum
MyPOV: One way to position a national *approach* without scaring people with a national ID is to remember how retail banking is standardised. All bank cards work in an identical fashion but each is different. There is no single bank account. #IDPolicyForum
Congress now overwhelmingly supports a national unique health identitifer (or at least overturning the ban on a health ID). Dealing with the opioid crisis is a driver. @RepBillFoster#IDpolicyforum
1. There's a always been this strong drive to make ID reusable, to reduce on-boarding friction, reduce accounts & passwords, save cost, even make money. -/2
[I'm dropping all @'s now to avoid annoying people]
3. I have dozens of cards and accounts all labeled "Steve Wilson" and it seems redundant. Can't I boil them down to one? No, they're really not the same identity. Each is a different relationship. -/4