I want to say something about @action4indy (AFI) which is now registered with the Electoral Commission (a saga caused by it's unique design -but nothing worth doing is easy).
I am an outsider. I've never really prescribed to one party or another. I'm staunchly pro-independence and I staunchly protect my independent status. I'm all for advocating for independence and I am all for advocating for my local community.
I've always hated what I refer to as the "party whip" and have always felt that having to vote stringently along party lines takes something away from politicians. If you vote the party line all the time, it's not always a good thing for your own constituency.
That's just common sense and pragmatism because the life of a person in the highlands is totally different from someone in the central belt. I don't think people will find that assertion too contentious. It's just a well-known fact.
The reason I am staunchly independent is that it gives me the latitude to be critical and praising in equal measure. If I think something will be detrimental to the cause, I can say so. Equally if I think something is good for the cause I can also say so.
I built Forward as One with that same philosophy in mind - Cause before party - colours left at the door and I like the idea of the free exchange and debate of ideas and out of the box thinking.
But the downside of being an independent is that you are a square peg in a round hole. My politics are very much OLD LABOUR (with a staunch independence streak). How could they not be. My grandfather was a union convener. My dad was a union rep. My mother was NHS.
But labour long abandoned its founding principles, of which home rule for Scotland was one of them. The mainstream parties always seem to be too concerned with policies that win votes, rather than policies that make real world change.
For that reason I have floated without a political home.
I have been offered to sit with several parties, something which I have declined because it would mean giving up my home.
And then Dave brought up AFI many moons ago and I approached them. Because AFI is not a party. It's an alliance with an open invitation to all political stripes dedicated to one thing - the advancement of independence.
It's built on the premise of allowing peoples individuality to flourish and respecting the views of parties and individuals who want to take up the open invitation to join together in a mutual pursuit of a shared goal - independence.
In other words. I not only get to stand alongside other pro-indy brothers and sisters - but I fully retain my independent status.
And what does AFI ask in return? Only a few things - A commitment to independence and a commitment to support any Scottish Government (likely to be the SNP) to support any move towards independence.
In other words - it asks of me NOTHING. Why? Because these are things I already support.
I support it because it's trying to do something never done before - cooperation without suppression of individuality.
Contrary to comments about "splitting the vote" (which in the Scottish elections is not a thing, it's actively trying to build a yes supermajority by putting cause before partisan politics.
i.e. In mid-scotland and fife where I am standing with my AFI brothers and sisters, the SNP wipe the floor in the constituency ballot. As you all know, the calculation for the regional list is then designed (by westminster) to penalise parties that do well in the constituency.
So in mid-scotland and fife, 120,000 yes supporters vote SNP. That translates to them sweeping the constituency, but because of a biased system, they are so badly penalised that those 120,000 votes go to waste in the regional ballot.
That translates to ZERO seats in the regional. But it's worse than that. It also translates to 6 unionists being elected by default. So me standing in cooperation with this alliance of other yessers, AFI in the regional list has no downside for the SNP.
But the upside is that, if we can get those 120,000 votes from the SNP (or even a large chunk) we could take 1,2,3 or even 4 seats from the Unionists in this region. One of which is Mr. Murdo Fraser. And we suspect a certain lib-dem may also be on the list this year.
We have an opportunity in Mid-Scotland and Fife to do something new, and deliver a full on yes-majority to Holyrood, and if that's not something worth fighting for, I dunno what is.
And as for AFI, well they've broken their backs to make a home for any person who wants to work cooperatively, to give them the opportunity to turn and fight together while also allowing them to continue to express their individuality and their party colours.
That, even at this early stage, is just absolutely amazing!
@trader_buddha@pjnichols@No431onthelist@BBCPhilipSim@AUOBALBA Part 1, Article 1, Paragraph 1, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights "All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development."
@trader_buddha@pjnichols@No431onthelist@BBCPhilipSim@AUOBALBA The States Parties to the present Covenant, including those having responsibility for the administration of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, shall promote the realization of the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity with....
I just want to clarify something about the #peoplesas30 because of a misconception. I've seen quite a few posts saying that the case, if lost, would be detrimental to the cause. It can't be and here's the reason why.
THE UK GOVERNMENT ADVANCED NO ARGUMENT AGAINST OUR OPINION.
What I mean by "opinion" is the original legal opinion written by Aidan O'neill QC that says that the Scottish Parliament already has the power to legislate for a referendum. The UK Government has advanced no argument against it.
The only arguments that the UK Government have advanced is against the right of the electorate to ask a perfectly legitimate question like this.
Obviously, this mornings update was done quickly on the back of the ruling having just arrived.
Counsel has spent the day going much deeper into the ruling and while I am not able to go through everything at this stage, what I can say is that our grounds for the inner house of court of session are stronger than we first thought. Which is great.
Joanna Cherry also piped up this afternoon, being a QC she had a good read of the judgement. Her assessment was put out on Twitter:
To all the SNP parliamentarians whooping today and about the ruling of lady carmichael and hashtagging with both votes SNP. Firstly, this result was expected. Very few of these types of cases succeed in the outer house. Going to the inner house was expected.
Secondly! Hang your head in shame for trying to campaign for your party on the back of this case. The "Premature, Academic and Hypothetical" would not have been a thing had your party released the 11 point plan the day before they actually did.
Why? Because it falls apart at point 5 and actually goes into EXACTLY the thing we've been asking in the case. You're not telling me that legal advice was not sought on something that substantive and that the party and its counsel did not know about it BEFORE the hearings.
Disabled. I am disabled. All these PC terms like "less abled" and person with a disability etc. These are all meaningless to me. Why? Because I am not defined by my disability, I'm defined by how I overcome it. All these terms used to describe me are created by...
...the able-bodied because they feel awkward about interacting with someone who is disabled. They are created so other people can feel more comfortable about the fact they feel uncomfortable around disabled people, not so I can feel more comfortable around them.
All you do when you keep changing the terminology is to paint over the underlying issue. Namely that people who do not share the characteristics I have (disability) keep trying to come up with stupid ways to label me and others like me rather than using "person".
You know there's one thing that gets me. Boris Johnson's visit just proves why we need independence. Think about it like this. He came to Scotland to a Lab that he was informed the day before had 14 cases of COVID 19. And despite that, he went there anyway.
So straight away, that shows us the Tories are wreckless morons that put their own political advantage about the health and welfare of those in Scotlands communities. Prime Minister superspreader.
But at the same time, it also shows the limited power that Scotland actually has to protect its own citizens because it cannot legislate when it really matters. Why? Because if the Scottish Parliament actually had the powers to do everything - one thing that would have...