A long coup was carried out in the UK between 2016 and 2019, the protracted assassination of Corbyn and the left. It was achieved by a section of the Labour party and the media, with BBC/Guardian leading the charge, and with near-unanimous compliance from broadcasters and press.
The coup was successful, and the staus quo ante restored. We now have a compliant and neutered opposition, and a Tory government which is steadily deforming the state in its own image.
The media who carried it out continue as if nothing happened. They carry on in their career trajectories, they are rewarded, they are championed. No adverse consequences attach to them. It’s as if nothing happened.
The MPs who screamed about second Holocausts and suitcases in the hall, they carry on. Just carry on, as if they had not just committed a violent and brutal coup. ‘Who, us?’ It’s as if nothing happened.
We’re all supposed to ‘move on’. Because that’s what you do after a coup: you move on. Moving on is the next act in this slow-motion assassination, in which the first act, the screaming and hate and madness, is all forgotten and everything is normal again.
Act 3 will be to deny it ever happened at all.
A successful coup writes its own history, and it will of course never call itself a coup. It will be allowed to fade into the near-past as we attend to other, more urgent, matters, and soon it will have quietly obliterated all trace of itself.
As if nothing happened.
>status quo ante
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I can recall when I first heard the words ‘second Holocaust’ in relation to Corbyn’s Labour party. It was a BBC report (of course), a vox pop.
I initially (naively) thought it would immediately be condemned as an outrageously extreme statement. But no, it was incorporated into the discourse without a pause. It was now legitimate to debate whether a Corbyn-led government would occasion a second Holocaust or not.
Emotional manipulation in politics is of course nothing new, it’s very much the stock-in-trade. People are motivated by *feelings* not *facts*, goes the received wisdom, illustrated by Bush V Gore, in which Gore had all the facts and Bush had all the feels, and Bush won. (Kinda.)
The most disturbing element of the #GreatSmearingWar, for me, is how easily people were duped by it. People who are, presumably, of good sense and sound judgement in their ordinary lives became wide-eyed, credulous cattle, ready - eager, even - to swallow every scam and fraud.
Just swallow it all down, seemingly without the slightest hesitation. Many touting this conspiracy theory were, of course, merely cynical political operatives, political assassins doing their jobs. But those who believed them should not have believed them, and they did.
A culture in which an obvious scam like this can succeed so effortlessly is a culture in trouble. If large numbers of people can be persuaded so easily of something so obviously false - the exact opposite of the truth, in fact - then they can be depended upon to believe anything.
It’s not clear to me how we proceed now. The antisemitism smearing war has accomplished its aim and only limps on under Starmer’s woeful captaincy, lumbering on more from inertia and paralysis than anything else.
The heady days of Rachel Riley and Margaret Hodge’s suitcase in the hall, and Jon Snow screaming ‘Do you apologise?’ at Jeremy Corbyn seem a long way off, as media attention turns elsewhere and it becomes yesterday’s news.
I’ve lost count of how many Jewish Chronicle stories have been found to be frauds, libels. There’ll be a ‘correction’ and an ‘apology’, which no-one will ever see, and there’ll no doubt be many more as time goes on. It won’t make any difference.
This might be a tad on the long side, for which apologies.
The Great Smearing War of 2015 - present is one of the most successful political campaigns of recent times.
Built out of almost nothing, it grew into a vast conspiracy against the truth, in which there was a race to the bottom as to who could make the most outrageous accusation.
This race was won, handily I’d say, by the Telegraph’s Simon Heffer, who infamously commented on an LBC show that Corbyn ‘wants to open the gates of Auschwitz’.
Mitchell and Webb were, I thought some of the best comedy of recent years. Then they turned into the same tiresome Corbyn-shitters as everyone else, and now I don't feel the same about them, at all.
'This narrative of bias has then been bought into by credulous factions on the left (though, of course, they accuse it of the opposite bias), who somehow haven’t twigged what carnage would be wreaked on their political hopes...
if the media battlefield were surrendered to the Murdochs and Rothermeres.'