(Thread) Dominion's lawsuit against Rudy Giuliani

Subtitle: Fun With Defamation Law

The complaint against Giuliani is here:
assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2046…

Dominion's claim that Giuliani enriched himself by falsely claiming that dominion fixed the 2020 election.
To win, the plaintiff must prove:

🔹A false statement purporting to be fact
🔹publication or communication of that statement to a third person
🔹fault amounting to at least negligence
🔹damages, or some harm caused to the person or entity who is the subject of the statement

1/
Dominion recounts facts to show thought up an "ideal" lie for showing the election was stolen:

So show that Giuliani knew these were lies, Dominion notes that he never raised these lies in court because he knew they were lies.

2/
The lie is outrageous and easily disproven.

To meet the second element, the brief recounts at length the many, many times Giuliani appeared on Fox, radio, podcasts and at "press conferences" to push the lie to "global" audiences.

Examples:

3/
To demonstrate that Giuliani knew he was lying, the brief recounts that, as Giuliani was spreading the lie to global audience, he was also filing lawsuits about the election -- but he NEVER repeated these lies in court (where lies have consequences).

4/
Giuliani not only presented "anonymous" sources (that seem not to exist) he embellished those sources.

There is much detail in this brief, including ways that Giuliani misrepresented what happened in elections to fit his invented narrative.

5/
Giuliani offered "experts" like Russell Ramsland to back up his claims.

To show Giuliani knew or should have known these were lies (insanity is not a defense!) the brief touches on Giuliani's legal training and experience as a prosecutor.

6/
Moreover, Giuliani persisted with these lies even after the lies were disproven.

The brief demonstrates that Giuliani "intentionally disregarded" reliable sources Including Trump appointees, Republicans, and election security experts who rebutted his lies.

7/
What makes these defamation lawsuits so compelling is that damages are easy to prove.

In addition to harm to the company's reputation and profits, people on social media were calling for Dominion employees to be jailed. Employees received death threats.

8/
Customers and those with contracts with Dominion started looking to cancel their contracts.

The resulting public distrust is destroying Dominion.

You can see that meeting the elements in this case just isn't that hard.

9/
As with the Smartmatic lawsuit, Dominion spends a considerable amount of time detailing the ways that Giuliani personally profited from telling the lie. He sold products on his podcast, etc.

What Dominion is demanding ⤵️

10/
The lawsuit aginst Sidney Powell is similar. The compliant is here: context-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/def…

Much overlap so I won't recount it all. If anything, her lies are even more outrageous.

11/
Damages are the same ⤵️

"All defendants" are Sidney Powell, Sidney Powell P.C., and "DEFENDING THE REPUBLIC, INC."

Remember, plaintiffs ask for more than they think they'll get. But still.

Well, if you destroy companies with lies, they'll come after you.

12/
I just read this over and I have decided to fire my proofreader. Oh wait. I don't have one😂

These briefs effectively show that both Powell and Giuliani knew these were lies and told them for personal enrichment.

Still, I got the feeling reading that Giuliani is just nuts.

13/
Reading, I also had the feeling that these people just think they can say whatever they want.

There are definitely more lawsuits coming⤵️ These take time. The facts are meticulously researched and laid out.

I assume Fox and Trump are next in line.

14/

It's double that, plus they're going for punitives.

Remember, plaintiffs ask for more than they think they'll get.

On the other hand, think of the lost profits, people losing jobs. That adds up quickly.



15/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

9 Feb
There are no due process procedures for impeachment mandated by the Constitution. The House decides how it will impeach, and the Senate decides the rules for the trial.

The Fifth Amendment requires due process before a person can be deprived of life, liberty or property.

1/
An impeachment trial is not a criminal trial.

The Constitution specifically says a president can be indicted (criminal) after being removed from office.

Impeachment isn't about losing life, liberty or property.

2/ Image
Trump is complaining that he was denied due process because the article was hurriedly drafted before a lengthy inquiry. He also claims that a president cannot be put on trial after he leaves office.

These two claims together create a last-minute coup exception.

3/
Read 4 tweets
8 Feb
(Thread) Trump's Trial Brief

Over the Cliff Notes

This brief, which distorts both the facts and the law, is vintage Trump: a mishmash of bogus defenses and misrepresentations.

The brief is here: context-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/def…

The brief opens by presenting Trump as a victim ⤵️ Image
The brief cherrypicks the facts and claims that Trump quickly denounced and urged only a peaceful protest.

The brief concludes that none of it was Trump's fault.

This "conclusion" is reached by selecting a few facts and ignoring everything else.

1/ Image
We saw this strategy in the first impeachment: Focus on the single telephone call (in this case, a single speech), ignore all the surrounding facts and circumstances, and conclude that the call (or speech) fails to prove the allegation.

This isn't how facts are analyzed.

2/ Image
Read 27 tweets
7 Feb
Thread: The Smartmatic Lawsuit: Over the Cliff Notes

The complaint is here: smartmatic.com/uploads/Smartm…

Attached is a list of the plaintiffs and the damages sought. The number usually given is $2.7 billion, but if this case goes to trial and the defendants lose, it's possibly more.
To win, the plaintiffs must prove:

🔹A false statement purporting to be fact
🔹publication or communication of that statement to a third person
🔹fault amounting to at least negligence
🔹damages, or some harm caused to the person or entity who is the subject of the statement

2/
I: THE LIE

The lie goes like this: Smartmatic was a Venezuelan company under the control of corrupt dictators from socialist countries. Smartmatic’s election technology and software were used in many of the states with close outcomes. . .

3/
Read 22 tweets
3 Feb
It looks like my blog and website will be down for 2-3 days 😢

@bluehost deleted my blog and website and it will take a while to get it restored.

Whaaaat?
My website and blog are back up.

Tagging them on Twitter may have helped 😉

Took 21 hours to restore.
I spoke too soon.

Images are not up yet, but it's getting there.
Read 4 tweets
2 Feb
(Thread) Over the Cliff Notes

The House Manager’s Impeachment Pre-Trial Brief

It’s here: judiciary.house.gov/uploadedfiles/… (77 pages)

I. Introduction

Right away, the House Managers steer clear of a pitfall they face: Having this trial play out as if it’s a criminal trial.
This isn't a criminal trial. Trump betrayed his oath of office.

The Constitution makes clear criminal prosecution can happen later. This trial can result only in removal from office and/or inability to hold future office.

So, for example, the standard of proof is lower.

1/
The introduction gives an overview of the facts, and the facts are damning.

“Trump used his bully pulpit to insist that the Joint Session of Congress was the final act of a vast plot to destroy America.”

"Fight like hell [or] you're not going to have a country anymore."

2/
Read 25 tweets
31 Jan
This is what he wants to do.

No matter how this trial plays out, the US will remain divided between those who choose truth, Democracy, and rule of law and the millions who reject these things.

1/
The question is how to move forward.

My mantra is that there are no magic bullets and these people will always be with us.

Except for state legislatures, they have less power now than they have for a while.

2/
The only real and lasting solutions are political ones. Get Democrats into local offices. Get people who want democracy to survive to the polls at every election, at every level.

It’s a constant battle.

3/
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!