Ethereum's fees
- are currently worth ETH at $2500
- grew 150x over the past fifteen months
- begin accruing to ETH holders when EIP-1559 launches later this year
imo, fees will soon greatly help us get to ETH at $20k. Here's how 👇
2/ Ethereum's fees grew 150x over the past fifteen months. The net present value of the run rate of last week's fees is worth ETH at $2500 (using a 3% discount rate), a 50% premium over today's ETH price. However, currently these fees accrue to miners, not ETH holders.
3/ Last week, ethereum's daily fees were $24M, and total miner compensation (fees + block rewards) was $47M in ETH. On average, miners must sell all that ETH to pay for their hardware and electricity. That's $47M of ETH sell pressure from yesterday alone.
4/ Once EIP-1559 launches later this year, ~80% of last week's $24M in daily fees begins accruing to ETH holders via fee burn. When ethereum switches to proof of stake in two years, the rest of that $47M in miner compensation begins accruing to ETH holders via no more PoW expense
5/ As fees continue to grow, EIP-1559 launches later this year, and ethereum transitions to proof of stake in two years, the fees accruing to ETH holders seems likely, imo, to propel ETH to $20k.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ ETH/BTC flippening explained at a mechanical level.
Compared to ethereum's proof of stake, bitcoin's proof of work is too expensive. Here's why.
2/ If we think of ethereum and bitcoin as "corporations", then their "corporate revenue" is equal to transaction fees.
That's the money coming in. Can't pay transaction fees without first owning ETH or BTC.
3/ In PoW, that fee revenue doesn't stay on the "corp balance sheet". 100% of fee revenue, along with 100% of issuance, is paid to miners. Then the miners *necessarily* pay ~100% of their revenue to hardware and electricity suppliers...
1/ imo, the ethereum community has been galvanized and is becoming aligned around the new rollup-centric roadmap recently described by @VitalikButerin.
2/ With the new rollup-centric roadmap, developers can now confidently expect their dapps to scale on ethereum, more or less immediately and into the future.
3/ Before the new rollup-centric roadmap, I think the extended community of ethereum developers felt a general sense of ambiguity around scaling. Should we just wait for sharding? Do we have to wait until sharding? Are people looking seriously at other base layers?
The proliferation of L2s and the success of other L1s won't prevent eth's fee growth, because the L2s use large amounts of gas and/or L1 financial apps will pay huge fees for composability in "city-like DeFi shards", as popularized by @hosseeb.
2/ It may be a common misconception that validator rewards or EIP-1559's fee burn are revenue streams for the broader population of ETH holders. They are not. They may affect the price of ETH indirectly in all sorts of ways, but aren't revenue.
3/ The value of ETH = utility + digital gold + productive asset.
I think that the scope of "productive asset" should be limited to profit that accrues to all ETH holders.
The scope of "utility" should be much broader and includes being a validator.
With the price of ETH surging today, I thought it might be helpful to list the potentially significant risks to Ethereum v1 continuing to run smoothly.
TL;DR DAI above $1 peg for 5 months; bots spamming transactions; Geth (we love Geth ❤️) is 79% of Ethereum nodes
Thread 👇 1/5
1. DAI has been above its $1 peg for 5 months.
Mitigation: ??
You can help: if you deposit ETH into a Maker Vault, borrow DAI, sell that DAI for ETH, and hold the ETH (ie. a leverage long), then you are helping to stabilize the DAI peg. 2/5
2. Bot arbitrage strategies might involve spamming transactions, with an impact on Ethereum's network layer and gas prices. 3/5