The People's Agreement of Cochabamba is the single most powerful, holistic statement on climate that I am aware of. Read it, assign it to your students, send it to your politicians, and make sure it's on the table at any citizens assembly: pwccc.wordpress.com/2010/04/24/peo…
"Humanity confronts a great dilemma: to continue on the path of capitalism, depredation, and death, or to choose the path of harmony with nature and respect for life."
"It is imperative that we forge a new system that restores harmony with nature and among human beings. And in order for there to be balance with nature, there must first be equity among human beings."
"We demand that developed countries: Restore to developing countries the atmospheric space that is occupied by their greenhouse gas emissions. This implies the decolonization of the atmosphere through the reduction and absorption of their emissions."
"We demand that developed countries: Assume responsibility for the hundreds of millions of people that will be forced to migrate due to the climate change caused by these countries, offering migrants a decent life with full human rights guarantees in their countries."
"The financial crisis has demonstrated that the market is incapable of regulating the financial system. Therefore, it would be totally irresponsible to leave in their hands the care and protection of human existence and of our Mother Earth."
"Rich countries must adapt their modes of life and consumption in the face of this global emergency."
But the best parts of the text by far are to be found in the Working Group statements, which you can read here: pwccc.wordpress.com/category/worki…
From WG2: "The model of capitalist development is a threat to life because it prioritizes consumerism and the generation of profits over common well-being and the satisfaction of basic needs, denying the interconnection that exists between human life and nature."
From WG8: "We demand to the countries that have over-consumed the atmosphere to acknowledge their responsibilities, and to honor their climate debts to developing countries, to vulnerable communities in their own countries, & to all living beings in our shared home–Mother Earth."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I really enjoyed this discussion with @sjmmcd. It gave us a chance to reflect on degrowth beyond the usual introductory ideas. See what you think: the-trouble.com/content/2021/2…
"Degrowth adds an anti-imperialist ethic to ecosocialism. The call for degrowth in the global North is not just about ecology. It is also a call for decolonization in the global South. Ecosocialism without anti-imperialism is not an ecosocialism worth having."
"It was once thought that we shouldn’t use the word degrowth, for fear of turning people off. I’ve found the opposite; people find it intuitive and refreshing. It makes no sense to patronize people. Appeal to their intellect, their humanity, their sense of care and solidarity."
@pierreaussi@LMdiplo@Leigh_Phillips@mdiplo Thanks, Pierre (and Leigh). It seems to me that these arguments are a bit old now. The debate has advanced quite a lot from this representation of it.
@pierreaussi@LMdiplo@Leigh_Phillips@mdiplo First, the ozone thing is a false analogy. Capitalist growth does not require CFCs in order to work; it does however require energy and material resources. This has been pointed out a number of times before.
@pierreaussi@LMdiplo@Leigh_Phillips@mdiplo Second, the Malthus thing is an old scare tactic. Kallis wrote a book on this, showing that Malthus was a prophet not of limits but of growthism. Degrowth scholarship explicitly rejects Malthusian ideas.
Many scientists believe that the rise of novel viruses like SARS-CoV-2 is being driven by rising resource extraction. If that's the case, we will likely see many more pandemics in the years to come, until we flatten the resource use curve.
Look at the rate of resource use growth and ask yourself whether vaccinations are going to solve this problem. If we want to avoid living in pandemic misery for the rest of the century, we need degrowth.
We should think of degrowth as a public health intervention.
1. If you *know* your methodology is flawed (i.e., it ignores corporate corruption enabled by rich nations), why do you keep using it? Fix it, and until then stop publishing your misleading index. #CPI2020
2. You claim that "private sector corruption" is different from public sector corruption. But if private corruption is *enabled* by government policy (which you acknowledge), then why should governments not be held accountable in your index? #CPI2020
3. Are tax havens private entities or public? If they are public (which they are), then why are the biggest tax havens (i.e., the US, UK and their territories, plus Switzerland Luxembourg, etc.) not punished in your index accordingly? #CPI2020
Transparency International has just released its corruption report for 2020. Once again it paints rich nations as innocent, ignoring their role in illicit financial flows, secrecy jurisdictions, arms trading, covert interventions, and self-dealing at the WB and IMF. #CPI2020
Corporations and financial institutions in rich nations are responsible for the vast majority of money that's lost to corruption in the global economy each year. We need to set the record straight. I've written about this here: aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/…
Remarkably, Sri Lanka has a life expectancy that's similar to the USA (shy by a year and a half) with a staggering 88% less resource use and 94% less emissions on a per capita basis.
These metrics are consumption-based:
Raw material consumption:
USA: 32.36 tons per person
Sri Lanka: 3.88 tons per person
CO2 emissions:
USA: 18.35 tons per person
Sri Lanka: 1.03 tons per person
By the way, Sri Lanka has a free, universal public healthcare system.