I want to say something about #antisemtism within the two main UK political parties - @UKLabour & the @Conservatives - & the grotesque disparity in responses to each, from Jewish leaders & communities, the public, politicians, & especially the print & broadcast news media.
Any & all antisemitism is despicable, & has no place in contemporary society - & especially no place in political discourse.
Wherever it is found, it must ALWAYS be exposed & very robustly challenged, as we all know where the scapegoating & demonization of minorities can lead.
As a passionate anti-racist all my adult life, it was heartbreaking to find instances of #antisemitism within @UKLabour.
There are discussions around the point at which legitimate criticism of the Israeli Govt becomes antisemtism - but that is not what I want to address here.
Moral Panic theory is instructive. Contrary to popular usage, calling something a 'moral panic' does NOT deny the reality of the problem, but rather suggests distortions in representation of the true nature of the problem, which limit our ability to effectively tackle an issue.
Stan Cohen made a distinction between internal & external 'disproportionality': internal refers to the disjunction between the threat of a given behavior & the fervor or concern which that behavior generates. External refers to a comparison between other similar phenomena.
'Internal disproportionality' - the REAL extent of antisemitism within Labour, compared to the unprecedented news coverage, levels of public concern, & response from Jewish leaders, MPs, & communities - has been widely discussed.
Again, this is not what I want to address.
I want to discuss two forms of 'external disproportionality':
1) the comparison with other similar forms of bigoted speech & actions
2) (imho more significant & concerning), the differences in responses to @UKLabour's antisemitism, & the antisemitism of the @Conservatives.
In 2018, there was unprecedented print & broadcast news coverage of antisemitism, most of which focused either on Corbyn's perceived past misdemeanors, including the lamenting of the removal of a mural, or on social media posts by alleged Corbyn supporters considered antisemitic.
News became sensitised to the issue of #antisemitism to the extent that the broader issue of rising instances of bigotry & hate within the UK, in part triggered by Brexit & the rise in populist nationalist discourse, was surprisingly - relative to antisemitism - largely ignored.
While the news media focused almost daily & almost exclusively on antisemitism, it was reported that hate crimes in England & Wales had doubled since 2013, to 103,379 during 2018/19:
76% race-related
14,491 sexual orientation
8,256 disabled people
3,530 Muslims
1,326 Jews.
So this is my first point: that given the MASSIVE INCREASE in UK hate crimes - particularly around race, sexual orientation, Islamophobia, & against those with disabilities - why on earth would there be such a preposterously disproportionate focus on just ONE kind of bigotry?
My second, MAIN point, concerns the almost total absence of reaction within the UK press & broadcast news (& politics) media, to high profile, senior @Conservatives - including Boris Johnson - making clearly antisemitic statements & mobilising antisemitic conspiracy theories.
The THREAD that follows outlines some of the main cases of crystal clear #antisemitism from high profile, senior @Conservatives - almost all of which have been brushed under the carpet by the national news, & largely ignored by Jewish leaders, Jewish MPs, & Jewish communities.
Draw your own conclusions about the grotesque disparity in news coverage of antisemitism within @UKLabour & @Conservatives, but that the CRYSTAL CLEAR rise in dangerous populist nationalist rhetoric, unseen since the Nazis, is happening in the UK YET IS UNREPORTED, shames us all.
THREAD of some of the instances of #antisemitism from senior @Conservatives, which the news media have largely ignored.
If the "free press" is supposed to hold the powerful to account, then it is currently not fit for purpose, & voters are being conned.
🧵 Online #Incel communities foster misogyny, resentment & extremism, which have led to multiple murderous attacks in the US & UK, motivated by hatred toward women.
Their echo chambers also amplify mental health issues like isolation & anger, radicalizing vulnerable men & boys.
In the US, proven murders attributable to incels include: Elliot Rodger, who killed 6 & injured 14 in a shooting & stabbing spree; Lyndon McLeod shot & killed 5; & Mauricio Garcia shot & killed 8 & injured 7.
In the UK, Jake Davison shot & killed 5, including a 3-year-old girl.
Farage defended his Reform UK MP who was jailed for repeatedly kicking his girlfriend (which wasn't disclosed to voters before he was elected), & in 2014, he dismissed as "just a joke" an MEP's comment that beating women "helps bring wives back to Earth."
A 🧵 about how spurious and inflammatory claims, based on unevidenced cherry-picked data, are passed off as truth by partisan private limited companies and used as a weapon to divide voters and to scapegoat and demonise migrants.
At 1.32pm on Monday 10th March, The Telegraph published the claim that based on “the first data analysis of its kind. Data from the Ministry of Justice, obtained under freedom of information laws,” shows that “Foreigners [are] convicted of nearly a quarter of sex crimes.”
Chris Philp, shadow home secretary, said the figures were “shocking.”
Shadow justice secretary, Robert Jenrick, said: “Not only is mass migration making us poorer, but this data proves it’s also making us dramatically less safe.”
Democracy is under attack. As with the US, Italy is 1 of 5 European Govts undermining the rule of law ‘in nearly all aspects’, with changes to the judiciary & a “heavy intolerance to media criticism”, fueling Europe’s deepening “democratic recession”.
A report by Civil Liberties Union for Europe said Italy was one of five “dismantlers” – with Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania & Slovakia – that “intentionally undermine the rule of law in nearly all aspects”.
The report highlights judicial systems subject to political manipulation, weak law enforcement against corruption, overuse of fast-track legislative procedures, harassment of journalists & growing restrictions on peaceful protests.
Many of Britain's most vocal 'anti-establishment' voices attended some of the most expensive schools on earth.
These broken boys masquerade as 'anti-elite' while serving the interests of the ultrarich by turning working class people against each other using 'Divide & Rule'.
Moscow born Konstantin Vadimovich Kisin came to the UK aged 11 & was sent to Clifton College boarding school (current fees: up to £18,360/term).
He recently said about Rishi Sunak "He’s a brown Hindu; how is he English?" He's a regular speaker at Paul Marshall's ARC conference.
Rupert James Graham Lowe was sent to Radley College, an all-boys independent boarding school (current fees: up to £19,200/term).
Lowe worked in the City of London for companies such as Morgan Grenfell, Deutsche Bank and Barings Bank.
My own summary is above, but journalist @gilduran76 - of the brilliant #FrameLab - has now written his own summary, review and interpretation of it, which I reproduce with a few links and commentary, below.
To fully understand Silicon Valley’s project to destroy democracy, read 'The Sovereign Individual: How to Survive and Thrive During the Collapse of the Welfare State.'
In 1999, it was rebranded as 'The Sovereign Individual: Mastering the Transition to the Information Age.'
Life was demonstrably worse in the 1979 than it is today.
Zymunt Bauman calls this yearning for an imagined past, ‘retrotopia’, in which the ‘Volk’ (the ‘simple folk’, who Reform UK claim to represent) are constructed as homogenous, Christian, white, & ‘indigenous’.
Life was demonstrably inferior in the 1970s compared to today for almost everyone in England.
Life expectancy in the UK in 1980 was 71 for men and 77 for women. By 2019, life expectancy at birth in England had increased to 79 years for men & 83.5 for women.
1. Economic Hardship
In 1979, the UK economy was struggling with high inflation, unemployment, and a budget deficit. This eroded purchasing power, making essentials like food, clothing, and housing more expensive relative to wages. "Stagflation" was a significant problem.