Frances has four directorships. Two are connected with Heathfield School.
One is the National Horseracing Museum.
The fourth is CH&L Limited which was incorporated on January 2020, although Ms Stanley only became a director in June 2020.
Today, Govt published (unlawfully late) details of a £14.4m contract it entered into (without any tender process) for PPE back in April with CH&L. I'm sure this is all just fine but, just in case, we will write to ask whether this was a VIP lane contract. find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/002630-…
Oh, and here is the Electoral Commission record showing a £5,000 donation made to Matt Hancock by a Mr Peter Stanley. Frances Stanley's husband is called Peter Stanley.
This "explanation" makes things worse. That they couldn't supply shows they shouldn't have won a contract. And normal suppliers are contractually obliged to deliver; they don't get to opt out of their obligations if they later discover they can't. Why was she treated differently?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We don’t know how many contracts Government gave to Saiger because it has been publishing them in lots of different places. Here are the five Government has published on “Contract Finder” which amount to £235m. /1
However, Government has also published five contracts with Saiger on Tenders Electronic Daily (and they are not exactly the same contracts). And they have withdrawn some contracts previously published on Contract Finder. /2
We at @GoodLawProject have a paralegal attending the case management hearing in the Tavistock's appeal in the Bell case on behalf of our trans defence fund. Occasional updates from them as the hearing progresses...
The 'stay' - effectively a suspension of the legal effect of the first instance decision - will continue. That has been agreed between the parties.
Judge doesn't want oral submissions from any of the would-be intervenors at the case management hearing. (I wouldn't read anything in to that.)
Another extraordinary development in our judicial review of Government's decision to award lucrative antibody test contracts to Abingdon Health. ft.com/content/272a49…
We have previously written about how Government has - there is no polite way to put this - lied about what it bought from Abingdon Health. goodlawproject.org/update/trying-…
We expect to make further, shocking, disclosures about Government and Abingdon's conduct in this case in the coming days and weeks.
Abingdon is one of the worst cases of Government misconduct I have seen (we could do with some help in pursuing it). crowdjustice.com/case/abingdon-…
If the question whether it is right to appoint your mates to key public sector roles without competition depends on an after the event assessment on how well you think they've performed, will the Government now apologise for appointing Dido Harding to lead Test & Trace?
Of course they won't.
Not a day passes without me being appalled afresh by the utter moral bankruptcy of this Government.
It's not some preposterous utopia to believe that jobs of immense national importance, power and prestige shouldn't be the preserve of those who are friends or relatives of the Government.
We await a permission decision on our judicial review challenge to Government cronyism.
*Repeats plea ad infinitum for @barstandards to be permitted to prioritise the regulatory objective of protecting and promoting the public interest.*
I make this point, as always I do, in the context of a political opponent being threatened with @barstandards referral for words or actions of theirs I find reprehensible but the principal control mechanism for which rests elsewhere in the law.*
The fact of @barstandards being asked to enter the political sphere can carry an implied criticism should it fail then to do so. That criticism can weaken its ability to perform the regulatory function which only it can perform of protecting against bad barristering.
I didn't know it then, but the New Zealand I was a child in was a closed economy, shuttered behind all sorts of barriers, based in geography and trade law.
Through my remembered eyes, there was much good about it. For example, there was a huge domestic craft pottery industry, whose wares were used across all social classes, who were almost all wiped out by cheap Japanese imports when trade barriers came down.
Almost all, except for a few who displayed the stubbornness that is the mark of a true New Zealander. Like this man whose modest domestic ware has now come back into fashion but we use at home because it's nice to eat off plates made by human hand. paulmelser.co.nz/pottery/