1/ We’ve allowed trans inclusive language to permeate society without being allowed to consider how & why it’s the language we use to describe women, our bodies & our biological reality, that is seen as problematic, that needs to be neutralised or erased.
2/ Why suddenly do so many females wish to identify out of womanhood, femaleness?
Breasts are being bound & this is no longer an act of self-harm but of liberation; a female is pregnant but rejects being either a woman or female; this is not self-hatred but self-affirmation.
3/ Instead, even considering that we are witnessing shocking levels of self-hatred among our young women, is what offends & causes alarm.
That increasing numbers of females regard their bodies as unacceptable unless rebranded & labelled male or at least non-female is just fine.
4/ In any other era, we would look critically on this seismic & to my mind troubling rejection of the female body & the female experience.
Those of us concerned that misogyny is being embedded & institutionalised by an ideology must keep saying so.
5/ We are not “completely mad” or akin to supporters of apartheid or guilty of “othering” difference. This is the language of manipulation & appropriation.
We are living through an era of male privilege run riot. It does not give a damn about female causalities.
6/ The reason males & females adopt a trans identity may not even be about the same thing. Could it be that for males it’s the pinnacle of male power but for females the pinnacle of female oppression?
Is this why we’re not talking about “prostate havers” or “penis people” ?
END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Last year, when my crowdfund was pulled down, I didn’t get a chance to read most of the comments. So I was determined to spend today reading them all — just in case! They are manna for the soul. allisonbailey.co.uk/comments/
2/ Please take a moment to read the comments, including from my original crowdfund, which crowdjustice removed from their site when they pulled my page down. My lawyers asked for them & we’ve reproduced them in a link in the comments tab. They are equally inspiring.
3/ The money is very welcome and necessary but the comments are a contemporaneous record of how decent people: women & men; gay & straight; liberal & conservative, feel about what has been done to our sex-based rights & protections. It shows the depth of support that‘s out there.
1/ @JoeBiden - People should be able to live without fear because of who they are and who they love, this includes WOMEN.
GIRLS should be able to to access toilet & changing facilities without the presence of MALES
2/ GIRLS should be able to pursue school sports & compete for college scholarships against other FEMALES & not lose out to inferior but stronger MALES.
In seeking to end discrimination on the basis of gender identity, you have instead heralded a new era of discrimination ...
3/ ...against WOMEN & GIRLS.
The prohibition on discrimination in employment, housing & healthcare is welcome. Opening up WOMEN & GIRLS sports, toilets & changing rooms to self-identifying males, pursing their ‘gender identity’ is not. It’s deeply regressive.
It’s worth remembering that the grant of leave to appeal does not change the judgement of the court.
The rule of law will and should run its course. In the meantime, all any of us can do is to follow the law as it stands.
Don’t trust anyone that suggests otherwise.
2/ Here is the original order of the court in Bell v Tavistock dated 2/12/20 para 3 of which grants a stay of the order pending permission to appeal, until the Court of Appeal determines permission & the stay. Permission granted, was the continuation of the stay too?
3/ The Tavistock implanted the order almost immediately by amending its contract with GIDS, despite the stay. The rationale for that hasn’t changed. The judgement & Order were so emphatic that I think it would be a brave or foolish clinician that would not seek to implement it.
2/ But most of all, despite everything that happened overnight in the US, I never thought I’d feel fear about a Democratic president, with control of both Houses of Congress - but I do.
3/ I’m a Democrat. I’m also a Black British feminist & a lesbian. I believe that sex is real & immutable. I believe passionately that gender-diverse & transgender persons must be protected from discrimination, but not at the cost of erasing ’woman’ as a sex based legal category.
1/ Judith Butler once again demonstrating that a minority of women are capable of being woman-hating, penis pandering, vicious zealots. All the while imagining that they’re being deliciously transgressive.
Woman-hatred is not new. It’s not radical. It’s just disgraceful.
2/ Feminism & recognising females as distinct from males, safe spaces, safeguarding & enforceable, legal protections from men, were not based on the belief that “ALL men are rapists or that the penis wields this nefarious power”, just that there exists a profound statistical risk
3/ Butler accuses JKR & therefore all survivors of having “fostered hatred & misunderstanding & perhaps capitalised on a history of sexual trauma”.
It‘s a special kind of woman that would say such a thing, of another named woman, who has been bombarded with threats & abuse.
1/ In a week that has brought hope to so many, this piece by @jo_bartosch is especially good. It captures the bravery of whistleblower Susan Evans, former psychiatric nurse at GIDS, on the Puberty Blockers scandal.
2/ GIDS: ‘Between 2016 and 2019, a total of 35 clinicians left the Tavistock, many reporting concerns. One psychologist, who wished to remain anonymous, feared that “young people are being over-diagnosed and then over-medicalised”.
3/ GIDS ‘Others felt the influence of lobby groups on clinical practice.
It also highlighted claims of homophobic attitudes among the parents of children attending the clinic, with some allegedly appearing to prefer their children to be transgender and straight, rather than gay.’