I would like to share the story of how a patient with cancer came up with the idea for a randomized trial, & how listening to him saved a lot of lives.

1/ In 2002, I had just completed a randomized trial with the notorious drug thalidomide for the cancer, multiple myeloma.
2/ Thalidomide would later be FDA approved on the basis of this trial. As a young investigator I was thrilled with the success and eager for the next exciting trial testing fancy new regimens.

But a patient with myeloma, Mike Katz, had other ideas.
3/ Mike was on national patient advocacy committees. He had battled myeloma for years and knew all of the recent advances. More importantly he attended numerous patient support group meetings and had his finger on the pulse of what myeloma patients were going through.
4/ Mike was also on the @eaonc @theNCI myeloma committee and listened as we debated ideas for the next myeloma trial.

While docs talked about creating “exciting” combinations, Mike said, “Listen, what patients really want is freedom from the side effects of Dexamethasone.”
5/ He said, “All these new drugs don’t help if patients cannot take them. You guys are giving too much Dexamethasone. And people are suffering.”

Dexamethasone was used in myeloma at high doses to kill the cancer cells. It was an important component of therapy. Mike disagreed.
6/ “You are giving Dexamethasone at a high dose on the basis that this is how it has always been done. Please run a trial and see if in the era of new drugs you still need such high doses of dexamethasone.”

@Rfonsi1 was there. And along with Dr. Greipp we were all skeptical.
7/ But Mike was not going to give up. He insisted we do a randomized trial of high dose dexamethasone versus low dose dexamethasone.

To us the idea seemed destined to fail. It seemed so boring. We had waited 40 years for new drugs and Mike wants us to test Dex dosing!
8/ However, we respected Mike. We knew he was aware of what patients were going through. We saw 100-200 myeloma patients a year. He interacted with thousands. He was also leading meetings of support group leaders who were leading meetings with lots of other myeloma patients.
9/ So we proceeded to convince the @theNCI and @eaonc leadership that testing the optimal dose of dexamethasone was the most important publicly funded randomized trial. @Rfonsi1 took the lead.

It wasn’t easy. But we got it approved.
10/ Long story short, the trial accrued faster than any other myeloma trial we had done in national cooperative groups ever!

Deaths with high dose dexamethasone (control, standard of dare arm) were significantly higher than with low dose dexamethasone!
11/ We had hypothesized that by using low dose dexamethasone we will have less toxicity and similar efficacy. Little did we know that just a change in Dex dose would save lots of lives: At one year 96% were alive with low dose Dex versus 87% with high dose standard of care Dex.
12/ There were other benefits as expected. All serious side effects including blood clots were lower with low dose Dex.

The Lenalidomide plus low dose dexamethasone (Rd) regimen was born. The little “d” signifies low dose dex.
13/ Rd is now the backbone of most myeloma regimens. The lower dose of Dex has allowed us to build many 3-4 drug combinations.

We are indebted to Mike. We grieve his loss. His legacy and work with @eaonc @ASCO @theNCI @NIH @IMFmyeloma endures.
14/ ASCO honored Mike in 2014 with the Partners in Progress Award. He narrated this story when he accepted the Award at the ASCO Annual Meeting. @ASCOPost ascopost.com/issues/may-15-…
15/ Our randomized trial of high dose versus low dose dexamethasone was published in @TheLancetOncol and is one of the most cited myeloma papers ever with over 1000 citations. thelancet.com/journals/lanon…
Here is his son Jason sharing how his father‘s story.
Yes. Mike Katz was an author on this paper.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vincent Rajkumar

Vincent Rajkumar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VincentRK

9 Feb
Maybe now some people will believe when I talk about cross reactive immunity. There are many redundancies in the immune system. It takes a lot for a whole world to be taken by surprise like it happened with COVID. Which is why we don’t have a new pandemic every year.
I wrote this thread about vaccines. But it also holds true for natural infections. The dose of exposure and presence or absence of repeated exposure determines durability and robustness of the immune response.
And why I’m confident that vaccines specifically designed to combat COVID 19 will be effective in preventing serious disease against new mutant variants.

The mutations have to be severe enough to make SARS CoV-2 into a new virus altogether to reduce protection significantly.
Read 4 tweets
7 Feb
Mutants or not. This is what is happening in the UK since the start of COVID vaccination. Vaccines work.
So while we sequence and find a particular variant is dominant, the numbers that matter are total cases and deaths. The UK is doing well with vaccination and offers a preview of what is likely to happen in the US in the next month. nytimes.com/2021/02/07/hea…
Read 5 tweets
7 Feb
Reading this WSJ headline, there is an important clarification:

SARS CoV-2 and its variants are here to stay. But if we vaccinate 80% of the population, which is totally doable, then COVID-19 the disease is NOT here to stay.

1/ wsj.com/articles/as-va…
COVID-19 the disease has brought about utter chaos & turned the world upside down because of its ability to kill 0.5 to 1% of the people it infects, put ~10% of people it infects in the hospital, & leave some with long term consequences.

This won’t happen after vaccination.

2/
A respiratory virus that can easily spread is not enough to cause this kind of life-altering chaos. We already have the flu, the regular corona viruses, the rhino viruses and such.

SARS CoV-2 was new. It was new to the immune system and our bodies were attacked by surprise.

3/
Read 12 tweets
6 Feb
Our group has posted guidance for myeloma patients on COVID vaccination. I recommend the same for 𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙧 patients. msmart.org @MayoMyeloma @MayoCancerCare
Which vaccine? Whichever approved vaccine you are offered.
Should I worry about which day of chemo or should I hold chemo?

No. These chemo drugs work for a long time and you can never be fully free from their effect. You may lose your spot in line or keep waiting for the “perfect” opportunity. Just get the vaccine when offered.
Read 7 tweets
5 Feb
Even yesterday I heard from a close friend who lost an elderly parent to COVID. They were just hoping to get vaccinated. But it was too late.

Every delay costs lives. There were over 3500 stories like this yesterday across the country.
15,000 across the world.
The new Administration took over only 15 days ago. They have a lot to deal with in terms of decisions that were already made. I have full confidence in their approach. I hope they can turn the vaccine situation around in a month.
But it’s not up to the federal government. It’s everyone from states to local governments to hospitals that have to gear up to 24/7 vaccination. Especially if J & J is approved and we have sufficient doses to dispense. Planning has to start now.
Read 4 tweets
3 Feb
If we focus on getting as many people vaccinated as possible, and continue basic precautions till each country reaches herd immunity, COVID will be history, mutants and all.
COVID minus its ability to make people severely ill or cause deaths is nothing. Vaccines work. And that’s what they will reduce COVID to.
Every month will bring news of a new variant or mutant. But for vaccinated people the chances of getting seriously ill will be very low. Not zero. But very low. In the range of what annual influenza outbreaks are. Time will tell. But I’m optimistic.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!