1. A “petition for rulemaking” is a request to an agency that they issue, amend, or repeal a specific regulation. Since Biden’s EO directed them to adjust their regulations for "gender identity," we want to force them to consider our petition first. womensliberationfront.org/news/president…
2. If the petition is rejected, the decision may be subject to judicial review and the agency must provide “an appropriately reasoned statement of the grounds for denial.”
3. In some cases, courts have found agencies’ denials of petitions to be in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, and the courts have remanded the denial to the agency to reconsider the petition.
4. Our petition requests that the @usedgov issue a regulation ensuring that they will enforce Title IX in accordance with the Office of Civil Rights, especially since @teachcardona specifically said he would NOT enforce Title IX to protect women’s sports. womensliberationfront.org/news/miguel-ca…
5. This petition may seem like just a bureaucratic move, but it’s actually the first step in putting pressure on the @JoeBiden administration and get them on the record about this issue. However they respond will lay the groundwork for future action.
6. The Department of Education is just one agency, and there are multiple others where we may need to take similar action, including Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, and the DOJ and Bureau of Prisons.
7. So what’s the role of Congress? Congress has created the legislation that the agencies are interpreting in their regulations (including Title IX in this case). They have oversight over these agencies, and can exert pressure on them.
8. This is why we are asking everyone to write to their members of Congress to support our petition. When you fill out this form, it will automatically send your letter (which you can customize!) to your Senators and House Rep: womensliberationfront.salsalabs.org/savetitleixsup…
9. When @usedgov makes their next move, we’ll be coming to you on the next steps. This may include replying to a call for public comment on the proposed regulation, or supporting potential legal escalation.
10. On a related note, we've also recently endorsed the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act, proposed by @SenMikeLee. You can also take action to ask your Senators to support this bill! #SaveTitleIX#SaveWomensSports
11. If you would like to support our work holding @JoeBiden and his administration accountable, please consider making a tax-deductible donation today to support our advocacy! We could not do this without all of you. #SaveTitleIX#SaveWomensSports
In a few years the bar moved from saying that children weren’t undergoing irreversible procedures, to arguing in The New Yorker that children should get to sterilize themselves for life without regard to the “arbitrary historical boundaries of childhood.”
Among those of us with left-of-center political ideals, it’s only radical feminists who will now stand up and say that it’s wrong to sterilize children because they’re different, or unhappy. It’s only conservatives who will platform us to say it.
Where are the other organizations that claim to represent lesbian and bisexual women, saying that these girls don’t need mastectomies? Where are the gay men’s groups standing up for the wholeness of these boys? Why are they abandoning their responsibilities?
This Department of Education memo, from the Office for Civil Rights, is a well-reasoned rejoinder to the Bostock decision, taking the justices at their word and protecting sex-based Title IX rights. www2.ed.gov/about/offices/…
“Title IX, for example, contains numerous exceptions authorizing or allowing sex-separate activities and intimate facilities to be provided separately on the basis of biological sex or for members of each biological sex.”
“[The] Department’s longstanding construction of the term “sex” in Title IX to mean biological sex, male or female, is the only construction consistent with the ordinary public meaning of “sex” at the time of Title IX’s enactment.”
There are legitimate worries about where a (now) politically expedient set of actions, regarding a longstanding problem, is going to end. And there are many reasons to think that the people charged with making decisions about this are going to overreach, as they have done before.
Here’s how the gender identity influence game works. If you don’t agree that men can be women if they say so, the ACLU will sue you, and monster you as a threat to “all women.” By which they also mean men.
All of these “women’s rights groups,” who’ve signed on to ACLU’s war on women’s rights, including sports, would be turned on and destroyed by ‘progressive’ MRAs like the ACLU crowd. They’d be vilified to donors, politicians, and the public, as violent, evil bigots.
In the UK, the original Gender Recognition Act (GRA) set aside a legal class for people who were diagnosed as transsexual and wanted to generally be seen as the opposite sex. MPs foresaw many potential problems with this ...
... but the answer in every case was that there were so few of these people that problems would be rare if they happened at all. Getting a gender recognition certificate also did not prevent necessary exemptions for single-sex spaces ...
... so the idea was that it wouldn’t be a problem anywhere that mattered. That was fine for so long, that when the Women and Equalities Committee looked to revise the law in 2015, they didn’t bother consulting with any feminists or women’s groups. ...
Some feminists have refused to accept, and therefore fully address the implications of, the systematic ostracism of anyone who shares our ideas from the power structures of left leaning political parties. Such a thorough un-personning and deplatforming wasn’t an accident.
It doesn’t matter what our own political ideas mark us as on an independent, objective political spectrum scale.
What matters is that the people who hold physical possession of the movements we care about, and may have helped build, have put us in their “Nazi” box.
No one will be heard whom the people in possession of the material assets, and social capital, of these movements, have marked as untouchable in this way. The woke staffers (they will all be woke) will likely never let your criticism reach the Great Man, or, now, the Great Woman.