1/ In retrospect, it was inevitable.

Why was Tesla the perfect next company to adopt Bitcoin?

How does it pave the way for Apple and others?

And how soon?
2/ Tesla’s announcement of a $1.5B purchase of Bitcoin sent shockwaves across the Bitcoin community & mainstream media. Bitcoiners see a kickoff to a major new company trend. Mainstream media sees a one-off event, which won’t be repeated by Tesla or any other company.
3/ MicroStrategy took a huge leap in making Bitcoin their main treasury reserve asset, but they also had stable, predictable cash flows and no leverage. There were no persistent liquidity concerns. As an automaker, Tesla has much higher operating liquidity concerns.
4/ The auto industry can have one of the most difficult finances to balance needs for bc it is so ruthlessly cyclical. When times are good, they’re very good. But when there is a (usually unpredictable) cycle downturn, auto makers are stuck with unsold inventory and high costs.
5/ To combat this, auto companies keep huge amounts of cash and massive credit lines. I.e. when the pandemic hit in Q2, Ford/Fiat/GM collectively drew $45B in credit in addition to their cash. Tesla is not a traditional automaker, but it does share these similar industry concerns
6/ As a company that needs to be hyper aware of liquidity, adopting Bitcoin as a reserve asset is a powerful signal to others. Tesla is a manufacturer w/ complex financial needs. It expands the scope of only pure tech companies taking on Bitcoin. If they can do it, why can’t we?
7/ Moreover it's unlikely that this is a one-off event for Tesla. Tesla has $19.4B cash, growing $4.9B in the quarter, driven by $1.9B in FCF and $5B capital raise.
8/ This cash balance is expected to only increase in coming years, reaching $26B in 2023, as operating cash flow strengthens. It's likely that Tesla will further follow in MicroStrategy’s footsteps by using excess cash flow to continuously acquire more Bitcoin.
9/ Another company in Silicon Valley w/ a manufacturing component and $38B cash? Apple. RBC theorized that Apple could enable Bitcoin via the Iphone’s preloaded Apple Wallets and would acquire BTC to fund these wallets. But there are other, more compelling reasons.
10/ Apple has been infamous for keeping a long standing cash stockpile, which has drawn heavy criticism from investors as a wasted resource that could be put towards investments in generating more future cash flow.
11/ Apple, like a growing number of other companies, has bucked this idea. They’ve kept cash out of a) uncertainty for the future and b) tax repatriation. When they bring overseas $$$ back to a US entity, then it is subject to US taxes.
12/ Apple could diversify their cash portfolio, hedging against uncertainty and inflation concerns. Even more, they can consider their settlements w/foreign companies. If USD is beginning to no longer be the global reserve currency, BTC could be another way to settle funds
13/ Apple is one of many companies next in line to acquire Bitcoin, given the ~7,000 companies that attended Michael Saylor’s Bitcoin for Corporations Conference last week. MicroStrategy previously shocked with how quickly they were able to adopt Bitcoin - 6 months
14/ But now that MicroStrategy has shared their “playbook” of how to do this, it has shortened the adoption timeline even further. At the end of December, Saylor and Musk connected (if it wasn’t just for show).
15/ In their 10K, Tesla lists their investment policy being updated for Bitcoin in January. And Tesla announced their Bitcoin investment in February. That's ~8 weeks for Bitcoin to be adopted. The beginning of April could prove very interesting...
16/ TL;DR: As an auto manufacturer, Tesla widened the scope of potential companies to adopt Bitcoin more than any other. There are many companies that will view adding Bitcoin as de-risked and will be racing to acquire Bitcoin within the next couple months.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ellie Frost ❄️

Ellie Frost ❄️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BlockBytch_

19 Jan
1/ Who are the investors in GBTC?

Why is there a premium?

And what is the sweet trade they’re taking advantage of?

A thread 🧵
2/ Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust made headlines again with their record 1-day addition of 16,244 Bitcoin, adding to their stack of over 630,000 Bitcoin and an AUM of ~$23B. Evidently business is good...So who are their investors? And is GBTC’s premium an incentive or disincentive?
3/ What is the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC)?Grayscale owns BTC in the trust & investors buy shares to represent a # of BTC. There’s a 2%/yr fee+a “premium.”The premium is the diff. btwn underlying BTC value(Native Asset Value or “NAV”)vs. mkt price of holdings(what shares cost)
Read 17 tweets
4 Jan
1/ “Bitcoin is better at being gold than gold” - SkyBridge Capital

@Scaramucci 's SkyBridge Capital released their investment thesis for their new Bitcoin Fund LP. They go a step further than other investors in why they are actively choosing bitcoin over gold

A thread 👇
2/ SkyBridge Capital’s main fund, with $9.3B AUM, had invested ~$182M in BTC. In Dec., they announced they were raising a new, separate Bitcoin only fund and already transferring ~$25M of BTC into it
3/ Today they opened to accredited investors w/ min invstmnt of at $50K. This Bitcoin LP won’t trade BUT you only pay 0.75% annual fee and no premium, the portfolio is priced by Bloomberg’s fixed rate (XBT). In contrast, GBTC trades OTC, a 2% yr fee, and a premium to BTC’s price
Read 15 tweets
24 Dec 20
1/ MicroStrategy has 70,470 Bitcoin. Now what?

A thread 👇
2/ Over the past few months, MicroStrategy has made Bitcoin its main treasury reserve asset, as well as raising a $650M convertible note offering in order to buy even more. This has amounted to $1.125B+ in purchases, totaling to 70,470 Bitcoin aka ~0.34% of supply.
3/ Michael Saylor has stated that these 70,470 BTC were purchased at an avg price of $15,964. At a current BTC price of $23K, his holdings are worth $1.6B and he’s already up $496M (69%). So what happens if Bitcoiners aren’t crazy and the price continues to rise?....
Read 12 tweets
12 Dec 20
Who are the investors backing Michael Saylor’s big play into Bitcoin? And how did he convince them?

1 / A thread 👇
2/ Russell Investment is the 8th largest shareholder in MicroStrategy (~2%). They’ve⬆️their position 70%+. They’ve bullishly blogged on BTC since 2018 with quotes like...
3/ “While many are questioning Bitcoin’s foundations, perhaps even more importantly, Bitcoin is questioning the foundations of the central banks.”

russellinvestments.com/au/blog/bitcoi…
Read 12 tweets
9 Dec 20
Citi just downgraded MicroStrategy over their Bitcoin bet, the stock took a hit and Peter Schiff feels validated for the first time in a decade

Why the pricing docs are already proving them wrong

A thread 👇
1/ MicroStrategy announced $550M in convertible notes to buy BTC. Citi research almost immediately downgraded MSTR from a "Neutral" to "Sell" recommendation and the stock dipped
2/ First, Citi is the only major institution w/ active research coverage on MSTR. Their recommendations will be overweight in the market. Even so, MSTR price remains up ~100% YTD
Read 10 tweets
8 Dec 20
Ok, Bitcoiners...here's a quick 101 on convertible bonds from a former evil banker

- A convert bond starts as a bond then "converts" to equity
- Pay lower interest to investors b/c it can be equity later - its cheap now (especially now) but you'll pay later w/ equity dilution
- Usually there's bad credit or expect high growth
- Why do investors like it? Protection. If the stock ⬇️,you'll still have the value of your bond. If the stock ⬆️,then you convert. BUT....most converts are "callable" aka they'll force a convert if price is > than $ of the bond
- Basically it is downside protection w/ a profit cap vs. owning straight equity
- Tesla is famous for this. The street thought Elon was 👏absolutely nuts👏 for insisting on raising convert after convert as he believed in his growth (they've recently stfu for some reason...)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!