She presumes a lot that she does not understand here.
The arrogance of many who have found their way into influencer roles in the evangelical world is striking.
The arrogance of many who have found their way into influencer roles in the evangelical world is striking.
https://twitter.com/ksprior/status/1359655104186613760
If an English prof with a large following doesn’t understand something in another field, she should consider what those in that space recognize, instead of jumping to a naive conclusion and sharing it with the world.
But it should not be a surprise such people are often given a platform in the Atlantic or favorable New Yorker profiles: the point is not to elevate the most thoughtful evangelical voices, but the people who can be counted on to tell us the right things.
https://twitter.com/nateafischer/status/1308080161997365248
This is widely understood in other spaces: any savvy investor knows to take the opinion of someone pushed by a conflicted party—eg sell-side analysts—with a grain of salt.
I wish more would recognize the same about political voices pushed by the mainstream media.
I wish more would recognize the same about political voices pushed by the mainstream media.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
