I think sampling bats for viruses is worthwhile as long as care is taken not to introduce SARS2 from human personnel into wildlife while going on these expeditions.
BUT I don't think that hunting for bat CoVs in SE Asia is going to answer how this pandemic got started in Wuhan.
You're just going further and further away from ground zero. Wuhan (top dot), Kunming, Yunnan, China (middle dot) where the Mojiang miners and RaTG13 was collected, and Chachoengsao, Thailand (bottom dot) where the new bat CoVs were collected.
The origins story for how a bat SARS2-like virus endemic to South China (especially Yunnan) gets to Wuhan is already fanciful enough, often requiring a high speed train where no one else is infected during the transit, stopping off at different cities.
How does a bat SARS2-like virus from SE Asia get to China? This is the new tale that China really likes, and the WHO origins team has unfortunately said they're going to investigate in the next phase - switching from Proximal Origins in China to #PopsicleOrigins in SE Asia.
Essentially, because there's no external access to human or animal samples near Wuhan (top dot) or near Kunming (middle dot) where the closest relatives to SARS2 were found, now the investigation is going way down South to look for SARS2 viruses.
Also noticed something interesting when looking at the read coverage over the genome (particularly the Spike gene) of the Thai CoVs (Supp Fig 1). I don't know how to interpret this... why across 5 samples there is a dip in read coverage over the S1 of the Spike.
The Sanger sequencing read quality for RmYN02 over this region is also very interesting and I wish that the authors would've made those data available for other scientists to look at.
I don't know why some scientists are confident that looking for SARS2-like viruses in SE Asia over the next decades will help us find the #originsofcovid
Without access to human and animal samples in China, you have a major obstacle to the biodiversity arm of the investigation.
I could be wrong. I just think that searching around in SE Asia or parts of Europe for the #originsofcovid, instead of trying to get access to where it all started, seems like a fool's errand.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We need actual teams that can investigate zoonotic spillover and #laborigins - preferably with international representation and absence of COIs/pre-existing relationships that could discredit investigation.
One major weakness of the WHO investigation was that there was no other ongoing investigation that could hold it accountable or that WHO could use as leverage to force more transparency from China. No, the Lancet investigation headed by Peter Daszak obvs doesn't count.
Dominic Dwyer, a member of the WHO team, on whether the covid virus could've originated from a lab accident: “Now, whether we were shown everything? You can never know. The group wasn’t designed to go and do a forensic examination of lab practice.” nature.com/articles/d4158…
WHO team chatted w Wuhan scientists, voted if lab origins were likely. This doesn't count as an investigation into #laborigins I hope @WHO knows that. "you don't want to jump to a conclusion based on several hours of conversation with Chinese scientists" washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pac…
Jesse Bloom, virologist @fredhutch "surprised to see some members of the team dismiss the accidental lab leak theory while seeming to suggest, without any specific evidence, the possibility that frozen food might have played a role." washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pac…
“Daszak responded to reports that the U.S. government wishes to independently verify any findings of the WHO team, by impugning the motives of President Joe Biden and casting aspersions on the integrity of the U.S. intelligence community.” rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/the-who-covi…
Spot-on analysis by @RogerPielkeJr of why the press conference is problematic for @WHO “A future departure from initial claims.. can easily be seen (and spun) as delegitimizing of the committee’s work. So the origins committee is now effectively locked in to these conclusions..”
I want to get a bit serious about the @WHO's dismissal of lab escape as a potential origins of the covid virus.
I'm keen to see their full report. However, the handling of the current pandemic shows that a country can get likely a pass on lab escape (or bioweapons) as long as...
(1) They don't publish their research in real time - this already isn't happening in science, and why would you publish original data/seqs if you were working covertly on pathogens?
(2) They don't give you access to their lab records or data, and tell you they have good safety.
The question is what we're giving up in the future so that we can pretend this pandemic's origin is resolved today.
Do we need another mysterious outbreak in a city with a renowned pathogen lab in the next decade before we get serious about asking what's happening in these labs?
@who going to investigate Covid-19 originating from frozen foods rather than #laborigins because lab leak too unlikely based on what the Wuhan lab personnel told them.
Not too confident that this @who team has much insight to the lab leak hypothesis - the WIV’s SARS research was done at BL2 and BL3 all these years, not BL4. Team could benefit from a lab leak/biosecurity expert weighing in on their report.
So the team says the virus was spreading before the Huanan market but that intermediate host is still the most likely #originsofcovid I’m keen to see the evidence that points to an intermediate host. Also, no mention of pangolins now? #pangolinpapers
Public service: This is now the link to the archived Fact Sheet released by the previous State Department concerning activities at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that could point to possible #laborigins of the covid-19 virus. 2017-2021.state.gov/fact-sheet-act…
@washingtonpost says "If the U.S. government possesses information to corroborate that statement, it should release it, including declassifying any intelligence." washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
The situation right now, I presume, is that the intelligence cannot be declassified because of endangering the source(s).
In that case, please create a curated list of non-gov people who can see this intelligence. There is a lot at stake.