(1) I have no idea what is happening to me but I appear to have fallen under the spell of Stacey Plaskett. I mean, look at this badass photo from the inauguration last month. Hot damn.
(The others in the photo are Terri Sewell and Muriel Bowser.)
Here's a thread about Stacey.
(2) Yeah, I've spent 5 years talking about the inherent corruption & anti-Americanism of the Ds but things have changed certain people threw us all under the bus. The Ds are still all that.
I now see the lunatic fringe of the Rs as just as bad. We have work to do.
(3) Not everything Stacey Plaskett said in her presentation today really happened the way she said it did. There was some embellishment, that's politics.
There's going to be criminal prosecutions. Witnesses will be held to a higher standard.
Most of her stuff was on point.
(4) I even tolerated sitting through the presentation of Ted Lieu. LOL. The trial is theater. It's not meant to be like an actual court of law. Explained well here:
(5) Regardless of party, Stacey Plaskett's bio is really interesting. She was a Republican until 2008. She worked in the Bush 43 admin. Like Tulsi Gabbard did, you have to switch to Democrat if you want to be elected in a deep blue district like those in Hawaii or the USVI.
(6) It's very hard to be a centrist or a moderate at the moment. A few years ago I prob would've had a bunch of politicians on each side that I followed & was open to listening to.
(9) I didn't notice that case in 2017. Probably because I focused on the nearly successful assassination attempt on my favorite US Congressperson of all time, Rep Steve Scalise.
(10) Truth be told, I think the proportion of Trump voters now taking a common sense approach to the situation is steadily growing. It's very hard to measure; There's a lot of emotion & anger. The dust will settle.
IMO, adding Delegate Plaskett to the line-up was a good move.
(11) The Senate trial is a necessary but not sufficient part of the process of addressing what occurred on 1/6.
There was no way to stop the Democrats doing this. So IMO we may as well try to get something out of the process, since American taxpayers are funding it, right?
(12) I find the evidence presented so far very interesting.
I had been investigating similar lines of enquiry in Nov-Dec, so it's fascinating to see what was gathered by the other side, with their far greater resources to do the work.
We ignore the evidence at our own peril.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Correct. Anyone who knows how the Secret Service does their job day in day out would see Trump knew:
>The risk of violence that day was very high
>The security was minimal
>Pence & hundreds of other GOP were at risk
>Trump had a duty to deploy DCNG regardless of pushback
And I highlight the number of GOP allies at risk, including staff, interns, visitors etc bc even if you can somehow understand Trump not caring about danger to his opponents: reflect on the fact he didn't care about Pence, Karen, Charlotte, or buddies like Reps Jordan, Hawley.
I always knew Mike Pence was a good man, who would sacrifice everything for his country if he had to. The left's narrative is that he "enabled" the bad things they accuse Trump of doing years ago. Ever stop to think about how close he came to using 25A? Thank God Pence was there.
(1) Thread: (Some of) the political implications of the death of Officer Brian Sicknick.
I've been finding the tweets of Matt Walsh thought-provoking and valuable as I try to understand our current situation. My reply to this tweet will need a thread.
(2) Matt Walsh is not the only conservative pundit focusing on the ways this LEO death is being used politically by both sides. It's now widespread, but I predict folk will move on to the next narrative line within a couple of days.
My view of it is fairly unique.
(3) Unfortunately for me, I happen to have learned a ton about health & safety, PTSD, brain injury, suicide prevention, & emergency management, through the experiences of loved ones & through work as a policy analyst/PR fixer.
Just heard that Mary Wilson of The Supremes passed away age 76. Honestly she looked more like 46, right?
Been a while since I listened to this great music. Simply outstanding in every way.🎶👠
Oh yeah... these lyrics:
"Set me free, why don't cha babe?
Get out my life, why don't cha babe?
'Cause you don't really love me
You just keep me hangin' on
You don't really need me
But you keep me hangin' on"
"Why do you keep a-comin' around
Playin' with my heart?
Why don't you get out of my life
And let me make a new start?
Lettin' me get over you
The way you've gotten over me, hey"
(1) The position Ronna McDaniel and the GOP leadership are taking on this issue is ridiculous.
Dems aren't going to back down from this impeachment attempt, and asking them to do so just makes the situation worse for Americans beyond the Beltway.
(2) I've been trying to figure which policy area is top priority for me: foreign policy or "law and order."
I can't decide. But the GOP, which I support, isn't doing a great job at the moment of being the law and order party. The Ds never do, but that's beside the point here.
(3) The world is stuck with the effects of a Democrat-controlled exec branch in the US for the next 4 years at least, and not a great chance of loosening their grip on Capitol Hill within that time frame, either.
What an unmitigated disaster for freedom & security everywhere.
This pic of a health provider treating a patient at this time
WITHOUT PROPER PPE
should be the issue the public focuses on iso pt's choice to use Gorilla Glue. The mask is not N95 rated. No eye protection, gown, or hair covering. An example of why we can't have nice things!
I'm sick of seeing examples of health providers not using proper PPE.
IDC where you live, if Covid is in your community, then anyone going to any healthcare facility should use PPE correctly.
You are at high risk of spreading the virus to vulnerable people if you don't.
I'm also sick of people on all sides politicizing the pandemic.
Fucking grow up already.
I am at risk of Covid complications that could kill me or at least cause huge disruption and distress in my life, which I do not need anytime, including right now.
"The "Imminent lawless action" standard was established by the SCOTUS. Under this test, speech is not protected by 1A if the speaker intends to incite a violation of the law that is both imminent & likely."
Intent is the key part of this...
(2) Trump defenders are going to say he didn't have intent, and that this could never be proven.
But often, it can be. Intent can be inferred from actions or omissions. And I think there are plenty, over several weeks. Not just the speech at the Ellipse that day.
(3) Some of Trumps Dec/Jan actions or omissions are publicly known. Others are not, as yet.
A proper investigation may reveal crucial evidence. That needs to happen ASAP.
If that's the relevant SCOTUS test, then IMO it may well be met.