Banning Robert F. Kennedy Jr. from Instagram should slow the spread of his dangerous lies and disinformation. Some publications politely call him an "anti-vaccine activist" but he's a conspiracy fantasist who knowingly incites threats against scientists 1/ nytimes.com/2021/02/11/us/…
He's been relentless during the COVID pandemic at spreading lies about every stage of the vaccine process. He's never been more dangerous. washingtonpost.com/education/2021…
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s group and another anti-vaxxer conspiracy group has been responsible for the majority of anti-vaccine ads on Facebook, as @bylenasun reported washingtonpost.com/health/2019/11…
Here's a taste of what it's like to get stuck on the phone with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. The self-aggrandizing, conspiratorial nonsense, the lies, the contempt for public health and experts. Anyway, good on Instagram & I hope he gets deplatformed everywhere slate.com/technology/201…
One final thing: He shamelessly throws his name around. In two different jobs, I was required to interact with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. after publishing something he complained about because he contacted my boss's boss. No one has brought more shame to a family name. 6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Join this webinar (happening now) from @NASEM_DBASSE on reporting on COVID. From @vishplus: "Journalism has been a saving grace" during the pandemic. His surveys show people who read traditional media are well informed about vaccines & eager to get them nationalacademies.org/event/02-05-20…
The @BostonGlobe has been gathering data on racial disparities of the pandemic and identifying problems and inequities in vaccine distribution -- drawing attention more than anyone else, @vishplus says
From James Druckman & his team's survey: Lots of people who are hesitant don't know that vaccines were extensively tested. Reporters should emphasize the size and clear findings from clinical trials to increase vaccine uptake
"Anchoring bias" is a huge problem with the coronavirus pandemic -- people tend to remember the first things they learn about a new subject & have a hard time updating that with new info (thread) scientificamerican.com/article/nine-i… via @sciam
The virus doesn't kill only people in China or in Italy or on cruise ships or in nursing homes. It can kill absolutely anybody. It's not just those other people's problem. It's everybody's problem.
It's not just in sneezes or coughs. Contaminated surfaces aren't the main problem. This coronavirus is In! The! Air!, spread by people who aren't necessarily sick and who are just singing or talking or breathing.
I’ve been a judge for a lot of writing awards. The deliberations are always strictly confidential, and I can’t say anything about specific contests, but I can tell you a bit about how the process works from a judge’s perspective, and what you can do to be more competitive.
But first, if you’ve ever won a contest: Congratulations! Your work was brilliant, the judges were brilliant, and awards are a fair and accurate recognition of the best writing in your field.
Second, if you’ve ever been a finalist or gotten an honorable mention: Congratulations! Your work was also brilliant! It can sting to find out you were so close to winning an award but didn’t get it (been there, felt that), but it’s still a big honor.
I'm an editor, so a lot of what I do is cut or change words. These are some of the mistakes and misuses I see all the time & how to fix them. This thread is not to shame or subtweet anybody -- I learned many of these mistakes by making them myself. Please add your own favorites!
"Enormity" means something really bad, not something really big.
"Japanese/Brazilian/Finnish/Australian researchers discovered..." Science is the most international endeavor in human history. Any team that makes a discovery worth covering almost certainly includes people who aren't citizens, so instead say: "Researchers in Japan/Brazil/etc."
We had an important discussion at #wcsj2019 about how to protect your sources, your data, and yourself. Here’s a thread of highlights from the session with lots of digital security advice & links. wcsj2019.eu/Sessions/Data-…
Here are some of the ways people can share information confidentially with The @WashingtonPost Note that number five is: Drop it in the mail, from a mailbox. This was a theme throughout the session: Don't use technology if you can avoid it. washingtonpost.com/anonymous-news…
I put a pond in my back yard about 10 years ago, and it has given the best return on investment in units of pure joy of anything I've ever done. Have you ever considered a water feature? Here's my experience in case it's helpful. A thread.
So there are a lot of expenses up front: a plastic liner to keep the water from draining out of the pit, a pump, a filter, lots of tubing, paving stones, plants, pots to keep the plants in, fish, beneficial bacteria water treatments, etc.
The pump sucks water from the bottom of the pond and into the filter, which spits clean water out into a stream that runs back into the pond. This keeps the water circulating and inhibits mosquitoes and algae.